A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Use of Automated Nicotine Metabolite Ratio Reporting Within Primary Care as an Implementation Strategy to Increase the Use of Tobacco Treatments.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae124
Robert Schnoll, Frank T Leone, Anna-Marika Bauer, E Paul Wileyto, Colin Wollack, Nathaniel Stevens, Daniel Blumenthal, Casey Foster, Fodie Koita, Julia Villasenor, Brian P Jenssen
{"title":"A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Use of Automated Nicotine Metabolite Ratio Reporting Within Primary Care as an Implementation Strategy to Increase the Use of Tobacco Treatments.","authors":"Robert Schnoll, Frank T Leone, Anna-Marika Bauer, E Paul Wileyto, Colin Wollack, Nathaniel Stevens, Daniel Blumenthal, Casey Foster, Fodie Koita, Julia Villasenor, Brian P Jenssen","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Concerns about safety and effectiveness of tobacco treatments reduce their use. We explored integrating the nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR), and messaging about its potential for improving safety and effectiveness, as a strategy to increase the use of tobacco treatments within primary care.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Through a prospective cohort design, we explored the effects of integrating NMR testing within primary care on the provision of tobacco treatment; 65 patients completed assessments including NMR before a clinic visit. At the clinic visit, patients' clinicians received an electronic health record (EHR) alert about the patient's NMR and personalized treatment recommendations to improve effectiveness and safety. Being asked about smoking and advised to quit, and a referral for tobacco treatment or medication prescription, were assessed within 30 days of the appointment and were compared to a usual care cohort (N = 85).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NMR and usual care cohorts reported similar rates of being asked about smoking (92.3% vs. 92.9%, p = 1.0), being advised to quit (72.3% vs. 74.1%, p = .85), being referred for tobacco treatment (23.1% vs. 36.5%, p = .11), and receiving tobacco use medications (20% vs. 27.1%, p = .34). In the NMR cohort, fast versus slow metabolizers were more likely to receive medication (26% vs. 0%, p = .003) and all patients who received varenicline (n = 8) were fast metabolizers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NMR results and treatment recommendations did not increase tobacco treatment rates in primary care, although it may increase treatment rates and the use of varenicline for fast metabolizers. Future studies could test ways to use the NMR to increase tobacco treatment rates in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study generated a novel implementation strategy, namely an EHR alert about patients' NMR and personalized treatment recommendations, in an effort to increase tobacco treatment rates in primary care. While the strategy did not increase tobacco treatment rates, it may have boosted the rate of varenicline prescription for patients who metabolize nicotine faster, aligning with evidence-based practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"1570-1575"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Concerns about safety and effectiveness of tobacco treatments reduce their use. We explored integrating the nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR), and messaging about its potential for improving safety and effectiveness, as a strategy to increase the use of tobacco treatments within primary care.

Aims and methods: Through a prospective cohort design, we explored the effects of integrating NMR testing within primary care on the provision of tobacco treatment; 65 patients completed assessments including NMR before a clinic visit. At the clinic visit, patients' clinicians received an electronic health record (EHR) alert about the patient's NMR and personalized treatment recommendations to improve effectiveness and safety. Being asked about smoking and advised to quit, and a referral for tobacco treatment or medication prescription, were assessed within 30 days of the appointment and were compared to a usual care cohort (N = 85).

Results: The NMR and usual care cohorts reported similar rates of being asked about smoking (92.3% vs. 92.9%, p = 1.0), being advised to quit (72.3% vs. 74.1%, p = .85), being referred for tobacco treatment (23.1% vs. 36.5%, p = .11), and receiving tobacco use medications (20% vs. 27.1%, p = .34). In the NMR cohort, fast versus slow metabolizers were more likely to receive medication (26% vs. 0%, p = .003) and all patients who received varenicline (n = 8) were fast metabolizers.

Conclusions: NMR results and treatment recommendations did not increase tobacco treatment rates in primary care, although it may increase treatment rates and the use of varenicline for fast metabolizers. Future studies could test ways to use the NMR to increase tobacco treatment rates in clinical settings.

Implications: This study generated a novel implementation strategy, namely an EHR alert about patients' NMR and personalized treatment recommendations, in an effort to increase tobacco treatment rates in primary care. While the strategy did not increase tobacco treatment rates, it may have boosted the rate of varenicline prescription for patients who metabolize nicotine faster, aligning with evidence-based practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项试点研究,旨在评估在初级保健中使用尼古丁代谢物自动比率报告作为提高烟草治疗使用率的实施策略。
介绍:对烟草治疗安全性和有效性的担忧降低了烟草治疗的使用率。我们探讨了将尼古丁代谢物比值(NMR)以及有关其提高安全性和有效性潜力的信息整合在一起,作为在初级保健中提高烟草治疗使用率的一种策略:通过前瞻性队列设计,我们探讨了将 NMR 检测纳入初级保健对提供烟草治疗的影响;65 名患者在就诊前完成了包括 NMR 在内的评估。在门诊就诊时,患者的临床医生会收到关于患者 NMR 的电子健康记录提示以及个性化治疗建议,以提高有效性和安全性。在就诊后的 30 天内,对患者是否被问及吸烟问题、是否被建议戒烟、是否被转介接受烟草治疗或药物处方进行了评估,并与常规护理队列(85 人)进行了比较:结果:NMR队列和常规护理队列报告的被问及吸烟情况(92.3% vs. 92.9%,p=1.0)、被建议戒烟(72.3% vs. 74.1%,p=0.85)、被转诊接受烟草治疗(23.1% vs. 36.5%,p=0.11)和接受烟草使用药物治疗(20% vs. 27.1%,p=0.34)的比例相似。在 NMR 队列中,快速代谢者比慢代谢者更有可能接受药物治疗(26% 比 0%,P=0.003),所有接受伐尼克兰治疗的患者(8 人)都是快速代谢者:结论:NMR结果和治疗建议并未提高初级保健中的烟草治疗率,尽管它可能会提高快速代谢者的治疗率和伐伦克林的使用率。未来的研究可以测试在临床环境中使用 NMR 提高烟草治疗率的方法:本研究提出了一种新颖的实施策略,即在电子健康记录中提示患者的 NMR 和个性化治疗建议,以提高初级保健中的烟草治疗率。虽然该策略并未提高烟草治疗率,但它可能提高了尼古丁代谢较快的患者的伐尼克兰处方率,这与循证实践相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
Appeal and Sensory Characteristics of Oral Nicotine Products in Young Adults Who Vape E-Cigarettes. E-cigarette Quit Attempts in Emerging Adults: Motivations for Attempts and Predictors of Cessation Barriers. Smoking behavior and social identity: Correlates of Phantom Smoking Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Other Sexual and Gender Diverse Young Adults. Analyzing the Diversity and Impacting Factors of Smoke-Free Legislation and Implementation in Mainland China: A Case Qualitative Research. Structural stigma and inequities in tobacco use among sexual and gender minoritized people: Accounting for context and intersectionality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1