Detecting mediation effects with the Bayes factor: Performance evaluation and tools for sample size determination.

IF 7.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological methods Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1037/met0000670
Xiao Liu, Zhiyong Zhang, Lijuan Wang
{"title":"Detecting mediation effects with the Bayes factor: Performance evaluation and tools for sample size determination.","authors":"Xiao Liu, Zhiyong Zhang, Lijuan Wang","doi":"10.1037/met0000670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Testing the presence of mediation effects is important in social science research. Recently, Bayesian hypothesis testing with Bayes factors (BFs) has become increasingly popular. However, the use of BFs for testing mediation effects is still under-studied, despite the growing literature on Bayesian mediation analysis. In this study, we systematically examine the performance of the BF for testing the presence versus absence of a mediation effect. Our results showed that the false and/or true positive rates of detecting mediation with the BF can be impacted by the prior specification, including the prior odds of the presence of each path (treatment-mediator path or mediator-outcome path) used in the design stage for data generation and in the analysis stage for calculating the BF of the mediation effect. Based on our examination, we developed an R function and a web application to determine sample sizes for testing mediation effects with the BF. Our study provides insights on the performance of the BF for testing mediation effects and adds to researchers' toolbox of sample size determination for mediation studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20782,"journal":{"name":"Psychological methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000670","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Testing the presence of mediation effects is important in social science research. Recently, Bayesian hypothesis testing with Bayes factors (BFs) has become increasingly popular. However, the use of BFs for testing mediation effects is still under-studied, despite the growing literature on Bayesian mediation analysis. In this study, we systematically examine the performance of the BF for testing the presence versus absence of a mediation effect. Our results showed that the false and/or true positive rates of detecting mediation with the BF can be impacted by the prior specification, including the prior odds of the presence of each path (treatment-mediator path or mediator-outcome path) used in the design stage for data generation and in the analysis stage for calculating the BF of the mediation effect. Based on our examination, we developed an R function and a web application to determine sample sizes for testing mediation effects with the BF. Our study provides insights on the performance of the BF for testing mediation effects and adds to researchers' toolbox of sample size determination for mediation studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用贝叶斯因子检测中介效应:性能评估和确定样本量的工具
检验是否存在中介效应在社会科学研究中非常重要。最近,使用贝叶斯因子(BFs)进行贝叶斯假设检验越来越流行。然而,尽管有关贝叶斯中介分析的文献越来越多,但使用贝叶斯因子检验中介效应的研究仍然不足。在本研究中,我们系统地考察了贝叶斯因子在检验中介效应存在与不存在时的表现。我们的研究结果表明,使用贝叶斯中介分析检测中介效应的假阳性率和/或真阳性率会受到先验规范的影响,包括在设计阶段用于生成数据和在分析阶段用于计算中介效应贝叶斯概率的每条路径(治疗-中介路径或中介-结果路径)存在的先验概率。根据我们的研究,我们开发了一个 R 函数和一个网络应用程序,用于确定用 BF 检验中介效应的样本大小。我们的研究为检验中介效应的 BF 性能提供了见解,并为研究人员确定中介研究样本量的工具箱增添了新的内容。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological methods
Psychological methods PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Psychological Methods is devoted to the development and dissemination of methods for collecting, analyzing, understanding, and interpreting psychological data. Its purpose is the dissemination of innovations in research design, measurement, methodology, and quantitative and qualitative analysis to the psychological community; its further purpose is to promote effective communication about related substantive and methodological issues. The audience is expected to be diverse and to include those who develop new procedures, those who are responsible for undergraduate and graduate training in design, measurement, and statistics, as well as those who employ those procedures in research.
期刊最新文献
Troubleshooting Bayesian cognitive models. A novel approach to estimate moderated treatment effects and moderated mediated effects with continuous moderators. Is exploratory factor analysis always to be preferred? A systematic comparison of factor analytic techniques throughout the confirmatory-exploratory continuum. Everything has its price: Foundations of cost-sensitive machine learning and its application in psychology. A primer on synthesizing individual participant data obtained from complex sampling surveys: A two-stage IPD meta-analysis approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1