Psychological distress, wellbeing and resilience: modelling adolescent mental health profiles during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sarah Butter, Mark Shevlin, Jilly Gibson-Miller, Orla McBride, Todd K Hartman, Richard P Bentall, Kate Bennett, Jamie Murphy, Liam Mason, Anton P Martinez, Liat Levita
{"title":"Psychological distress, wellbeing and resilience: modelling adolescent mental health profiles during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Sarah Butter, Mark Shevlin, Jilly Gibson-Miller, Orla McBride, Todd K Hartman, Richard P Bentall, Kate Bennett, Jamie Murphy, Liam Mason, Anton P Martinez, Liat Levita","doi":"10.1007/s44192-024-00071-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has been concern about adolescent mental health during the pandemic. The current study examined adolescent mental health during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. Using indicator of psychological distress, wellbeing and resilience, latent profile analysis was used to identify homogeneous mental health groups among young people aged 13-24 (N = 1971). Multinomial logistic regression was then used to examine which sociodemographic and psychosocial variables predicted latent class membership. Four classes were found. The largest class (Class 1, 37.2%) was characterised by moderate symptomology and moderate wellbeing. Class 2 (34.2%) was characterised by low symptomology and high wellbeing, while Class 3 (25.4%) was characterised by moderate symptomology and high wellbeing. Finally, Class 4 was the smallest (3.2%) and was characterised by high symptomology and low wellbeing. Compared to the low symptomology, high wellbeing class, all other classes were associated with less social engagement with friends, poorer family functioning, greater somatic symptoms, and a less positive model of self. A number of unique associations between the classes and predictor variables were identified. Although around two-thirds of adolescents reported moderate-to-high symptomology, most of these individuals also reported concurrent moderate-to-high levels of wellbeing, reflecting resilience. Furthermore, these findings demonstrate how a more comprehensive picture of mental health can be gained through adopting a dual-continua conceptualisation of mental health that incorporates both pathology and well-being. In this way, at-risk youth can be identified and interventions and resources targeted appropriately.</p>","PeriodicalId":72827,"journal":{"name":"Discover mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-024-00071-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been concern about adolescent mental health during the pandemic. The current study examined adolescent mental health during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. Using indicator of psychological distress, wellbeing and resilience, latent profile analysis was used to identify homogeneous mental health groups among young people aged 13-24 (N = 1971). Multinomial logistic regression was then used to examine which sociodemographic and psychosocial variables predicted latent class membership. Four classes were found. The largest class (Class 1, 37.2%) was characterised by moderate symptomology and moderate wellbeing. Class 2 (34.2%) was characterised by low symptomology and high wellbeing, while Class 3 (25.4%) was characterised by moderate symptomology and high wellbeing. Finally, Class 4 was the smallest (3.2%) and was characterised by high symptomology and low wellbeing. Compared to the low symptomology, high wellbeing class, all other classes were associated with less social engagement with friends, poorer family functioning, greater somatic symptoms, and a less positive model of self. A number of unique associations between the classes and predictor variables were identified. Although around two-thirds of adolescents reported moderate-to-high symptomology, most of these individuals also reported concurrent moderate-to-high levels of wellbeing, reflecting resilience. Furthermore, these findings demonstrate how a more comprehensive picture of mental health can be gained through adopting a dual-continua conceptualisation of mental health that incorporates both pathology and well-being. In this way, at-risk youth can be identified and interventions and resources targeted appropriately.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理困扰、幸福和复原力:COVID-19 大流行期间青少年心理健康概况模型。
大流行期间的青少年心理健康问题一直备受关注。本研究对英国 COVID-19 大流行初期的青少年心理健康进行了调查。利用心理困扰、幸福感和复原力指标,采用潜在特征分析在 13-24 岁的青少年(N = 1971)中确定同质心理健康群体。然后使用多项式逻辑回归来研究哪些社会人口和社会心理变量可以预测潜在的群体成员。结果发现有四个类别。最大的一类(1 类,37.2%)的特点是症状和健康状况适中。第 2 类(34.2%)的特征是低症状和高幸福感,而第 3 类(25.4%)的特征是中等症状和高幸福感。最后,第 4 类患者最少(3.2%),症状较重,健康状况较差。与低症状、高幸福感类别相比,所有其他类别都与较少与朋友交往、较差的家庭功能、较多的躯体症状和较不积极的自我模式有关。研究还发现,各等级与预测变量之间存在一些独特的关联。虽然约有三分之二的青少年报告了中度至高度的症状,但其中大多数人同时也报告了中度至高度的幸福感,这反映了他们的复原力。此外,这些研究结果还表明,通过采用包含病理和幸福感的双重心理健康概念,可以更全面地了解心理健康。这样,就可以识别高危青少年,并有针对性地采取适当的干预措施和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collaborative strategies for adolescent suicide prevention: insights from Slovakia and Kyrgyzstan. Mental distress and associated factors among undergraduate students: evidence from a cross-sectional study at the University of Dodoma, Tanzania. Validation of the Japanese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4-J) to screen for depression and anxiety. Does major make a difference? Mental health literacy and its relation to college major in a diverse sample of undergraduate students. Understanding community-based mental health interventions among migrant workers in Singapore.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1