High-Intensity Blue Light (450-460 nm) Phototherapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Wounds.

Andreas Zoric, Mahsa Bagheri, Maria von Kohout, Tara Fardoust, Paul C Fuchs, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer
{"title":"High-Intensity Blue Light (450-460 nm) Phototherapy for <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>-Infected Wounds.","authors":"Andreas Zoric, Mahsa Bagheri, Maria von Kohout, Tara Fardoust, Paul C Fuchs, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer","doi":"10.1089/photob.2023.0180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Nosocomial wound infection with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for the septic mortality of burn patients. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections and will be investigated in this study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Antibacterial effects of a light-emitting diode array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>; 15/30 min; 270/540 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan<sup>®</sup>; PRT). <b><i>Results:</i></b> aBL reduced the bacterial number [2.51-3.56 log<sub>10</sub> colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL], whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. Here, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log<sub>10</sub> CFU), but to a lower extend than PRT (2.41 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) or CA (2.48 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) and CA (2.30 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":"42 5","pages":"356-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nosocomial wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for the septic mortality of burn patients. Objective: High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections and will be investigated in this study. Methods: Antibacterial effects of a light-emitting diode array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm2; 15/30 min; 270/540 J/cm2) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan®; PRT). Results: aBL reduced the bacterial number [2.51-3.56 log10 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL], whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log10 CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. Here, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log10 CFU), but to a lower extend than PRT (2.41 log10 CFU) or CA (2.48 log10 CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log10 CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log10 CFU) and CA (2.30 log10 CFU). Conclusions: aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对铜绿假单胞菌感染伤口的高强度蓝光(450-460 纳米)光疗。
背景:铜绿假单胞菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa,PA)引起的伤口感染是一种严重的并发症,往往是烧伤患者败血症死亡的原因。目的:高强度抗菌蓝光(aBL)治疗可能是治疗铜绿假单胞菌感染的一种替代疗法,本研究将对其进行研究。研究方法通过悬浮试验、生物膜试验和人体皮肤伤口模型确定发光二极管阵列(450-460 纳米;300 毫瓦/平方厘米;15/30 分钟;270/540 焦耳/平方厘米)对 PA 的抗菌效果,并与 15 分钟局部应用 3% 柠檬酸(CA)和伤口冲洗液(Prontosan®;PRT)进行比较。结果:在悬浮试验中,aBL 可减少细菌数量[2.51-3.56 log10 菌落总数(CFU)/mL],而 PRT 或 CA 处理可减少 4.64 或 6.60 log10 CFU/mL。而 PRT 或 CA 处理则减少了 25% 或 13%。在这里,aBL 可减少生物膜中的细菌数量(1.30-1.64 log10 CFU),但减少程度低于 PRT(2.41 log10 CFU)或 CA(2.48 log10 CFU)。在伤口皮肤模型中,aBL(2.21-2.33 log10 CFU)减少细菌的程度与 PRT(2.26 log10 CFU)和 CA(2.30 log10 CFU)相同。结论:aBL 在短时间内对 PA 和生物膜的形成具有显著的抗菌效果。然而,将 aBL 应用于伤口治疗需要有效的主动皮肤冷却和眼睛保护,这反过来又会限制临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery Editor-in-Chief: Michael R Hamblin, PhD Co-Editor-in-Chief: Heidi Abrahamse, PhD
期刊最新文献
A 675 nm Laser in the Treatment of Facial Melasma in Dark Skin Types. Influence of Photobiomodulation Therapy Combined with Pelvic Floor Exercises on Postpartum Coccydynia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Optimal Timing of Photobiomodulation Therapy for Retinal Diseases: Leveraging Circadian Mitochondrial Rhythms. Primary Dentin Conditioning with Methylene Blue Activated Photodynamic Therapy, Phytic Acid, and Er,Cr:YSGG to Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Comparison to Conventional Polyacrylic Acid. Efficacy and Safety of UVA1 Phototherapy Adjunct Treatment for Acute Cutaneous Inflammations and Neuralgia of Herpes Zoster: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded End-Point Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1