Characterizing leaf-deposited particles: Single-particle mass spectral analysis and comparison with naturally fallen particles

IF 14 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science and Ecotechnology Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ese.2024.100432
Dele Chen , Hua-Yun Xiao , Ningxiao Sun , Jingli Yan , Shan Yin
{"title":"Characterizing leaf-deposited particles: Single-particle mass spectral analysis and comparison with naturally fallen particles","authors":"Dele Chen ,&nbsp;Hua-Yun Xiao ,&nbsp;Ningxiao Sun ,&nbsp;Jingli Yan ,&nbsp;Shan Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.ese.2024.100432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The size and composition of particulate matter (PM) are pivotal in determining its adverse health effects. It is important to understand PM's retention by plants to facilitate its atmospheric removal. However, the distinctions between the size and composition of naturally fallen PM (NFPM) and leaf-deposited PM (LDPM) are not well-documented. Here we utilize a single-particle aerosol mass spectrometer, coupled with a PM resuspension chamber, to analyze these differences. We find that LDPM particles are 6.8–97.3 % larger than NFPM. Employing a neural network algorithm based on adaptive resonance theory, we have identified distinct compositional profiles: NFPM predominantly consists of organic carbon (OC; 31.2 %) and potassium-rich components (19.1 %), whereas LDPM are largely composed of crustal species (53.9–60.6 %). Interestingly, coniferous species retain higher OC content (11.5–13.7 %) compared to broad-leaved species (0.5–1.2 %), while the levoglucosan content exhibit an opposite trend. Our study highlights the active role of tree leaves in modifying PM composition beyond mere passive capture, advocating for a strategic approach to species selection in urban greening initiatives to enhance PM mitigation. These insights provide guidance for urban planners and environmentalists in implementing nature-based solutions to improve urban air quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34434,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100432"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498424000462/pdfft?md5=8cdd3036d7eba543ef498a7c763eba4d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666498424000462-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498424000462","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The size and composition of particulate matter (PM) are pivotal in determining its adverse health effects. It is important to understand PM's retention by plants to facilitate its atmospheric removal. However, the distinctions between the size and composition of naturally fallen PM (NFPM) and leaf-deposited PM (LDPM) are not well-documented. Here we utilize a single-particle aerosol mass spectrometer, coupled with a PM resuspension chamber, to analyze these differences. We find that LDPM particles are 6.8–97.3 % larger than NFPM. Employing a neural network algorithm based on adaptive resonance theory, we have identified distinct compositional profiles: NFPM predominantly consists of organic carbon (OC; 31.2 %) and potassium-rich components (19.1 %), whereas LDPM are largely composed of crustal species (53.9–60.6 %). Interestingly, coniferous species retain higher OC content (11.5–13.7 %) compared to broad-leaved species (0.5–1.2 %), while the levoglucosan content exhibit an opposite trend. Our study highlights the active role of tree leaves in modifying PM composition beyond mere passive capture, advocating for a strategic approach to species selection in urban greening initiatives to enhance PM mitigation. These insights provide guidance for urban planners and environmentalists in implementing nature-based solutions to improve urban air quality.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叶片沉积颗粒的特征:单颗粒质谱分析及与自然落下颗粒的比较
颗粒物(PM)的大小和成分是决定其不良健康影响的关键。了解可吸入颗粒物在植物中的滞留情况以促进其在大气中的清除非常重要。然而,自然落下的可吸入颗粒物(NFPM)和叶片沉积的可吸入颗粒物(LDPM)的大小和成分之间的区别并没有得到很好的记录。在这里,我们利用单颗粒气溶胶质谱仪和可吸入颗粒物再悬浮室来分析这些差异。我们发现 LDPM 颗粒比 NFPM 大 6.8-97.3%。利用基于自适应共振理论的神经网络算法,我们确定了不同的成分特征:NFPM主要由有机碳(OC;31.2%)和富含钾的成分(19.1%)组成,而LDPM主要由地壳物种(53.9-60.6%)组成。有趣的是,与阔叶树种(0.5-1.2%)相比,针叶树种保留了更高的 OC 含量(11.5-13.7%),而左旋葡聚糖含量则呈现出相反的趋势。我们的研究强调了树叶在改变可吸入颗粒物成分方面的积极作用,而不仅仅是被动捕捉,提倡在城市绿化活动中采用树种选择的战略方法,以加强可吸入颗粒物的减缓作用。这些见解为城市规划者和环境学家实施基于自然的解决方案以改善城市空气质量提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
6.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Ecotechnology (ESE) is an international, open-access journal publishing original research in environmental science, engineering, ecotechnology, and related fields. Authors publishing in ESE can immediately, permanently, and freely share their work. They have license options and retain copyright. Published by Elsevier, ESE is co-organized by the Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, and the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology.
期刊最新文献
A social-environmental impact perspective of generative artificial intelligence. Molecular dynamics of photosynthetic electron flow in a biophotovoltaic system. The 2023 report of the synergetic roadmap on carbon neutrality and clean air for China: Carbon reduction, pollution mitigation, greening, and growth. Graph neural networks and transfer entropy enhance forecasting of mesozooplankton community dynamics. More inputs of antibiotics into groundwater but less into rivers as a result of manure management in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1