Strain of the vertebral artery during passive neck movements and spinal manipulation of the cervical spine: An observational study

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.011
Caroline Fagundes , Walter Herzog
{"title":"Strain of the vertebral artery during passive neck movements and spinal manipulation of the cervical spine: An observational study","authors":"Caroline Fagundes ,&nbsp;Walter Herzog","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Neck pain is a common condition, and a frequent treatment is chiropractic cervical spinal manipulation therapy (cSMT). However, cervical spinal manipulations have been associated with excessive cervical artery elongations, allegedly causing arterial dissection leading to stroke.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The primary purpose of this study was to quantify the total vertebral artery elongations during cSMT, and secondarily, quantify the vertebral artery elongations during the pre-manipulative orientation of the head and neck and the subsequent elongations during the actual thrust.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Vertebral artery strains were measured at the cervical levels C0–C1, C1–C2, and C2–C3 using piezoelectric crystals that were sutured to the wall of the left and right vertebral artery in three cadavers. Vertebral artery strains were measured continuously for a full set of passive range of motion testing and for the chiropractic spinal manipulation.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>For the range of motion testing, the greatest average vertebral artery strains at the C0–C1 level were 6.9% for ipsilateral flexion-rotation, at the C1–C2 level 4.3% for contralateral rotation, and at the C2–C3 level 3.7% for contralateral flexion-rotation. For the chiropractic spinal manipulation, the average maximal strains at the C0–C1, C1–C2 and C2–C3 levels were 1.3%, 0.1%, and 1.0%, respectively. The maximal average vertebral artery strains in the pre-manipulative phase were 0.5% and the corresponding maximal vertebral artery strains during the manipulative thrust was 1.1%.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Passive range of motion testing produced strains in the vertebral artery were 5.3 times (C0–C1), 7.2 times (C1–C2), and 3.7 times (C2–C3) greater than the corresponding strains during chiropractic spinal manipulation, suggesting that strains in the vertebral artery during chiropractic spinal manipulation were much smaller than the strains that can occur during normal everyday movements of the head and neck. Furthermore, vertebral artery strains in the pre-manipulative phase did not contribute to the peak strains on the contralateral vertebral artery and helped reduce strains on the ipsilateral side.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224002882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Neck pain is a common condition, and a frequent treatment is chiropractic cervical spinal manipulation therapy (cSMT). However, cervical spinal manipulations have been associated with excessive cervical artery elongations, allegedly causing arterial dissection leading to stroke.

Purpose

The primary purpose of this study was to quantify the total vertebral artery elongations during cSMT, and secondarily, quantify the vertebral artery elongations during the pre-manipulative orientation of the head and neck and the subsequent elongations during the actual thrust.

Methods

Vertebral artery strains were measured at the cervical levels C0–C1, C1–C2, and C2–C3 using piezoelectric crystals that were sutured to the wall of the left and right vertebral artery in three cadavers. Vertebral artery strains were measured continuously for a full set of passive range of motion testing and for the chiropractic spinal manipulation.

Findings

For the range of motion testing, the greatest average vertebral artery strains at the C0–C1 level were 6.9% for ipsilateral flexion-rotation, at the C1–C2 level 4.3% for contralateral rotation, and at the C2–C3 level 3.7% for contralateral flexion-rotation. For the chiropractic spinal manipulation, the average maximal strains at the C0–C1, C1–C2 and C2–C3 levels were 1.3%, 0.1%, and 1.0%, respectively. The maximal average vertebral artery strains in the pre-manipulative phase were 0.5% and the corresponding maximal vertebral artery strains during the manipulative thrust was 1.1%.

Interpretation

Passive range of motion testing produced strains in the vertebral artery were 5.3 times (C0–C1), 7.2 times (C1–C2), and 3.7 times (C2–C3) greater than the corresponding strains during chiropractic spinal manipulation, suggesting that strains in the vertebral artery during chiropractic spinal manipulation were much smaller than the strains that can occur during normal everyday movements of the head and neck. Furthermore, vertebral artery strains in the pre-manipulative phase did not contribute to the peak strains on the contralateral vertebral artery and helped reduce strains on the ipsilateral side.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈部被动运动和颈椎手法时椎动脉的应变:观察研究
背景颈部疼痛是一种常见病,经常采用的治疗方法是脊椎推拿颈椎手法治疗(cSMT)。本研究的主要目的是量化颈椎手法治疗时椎动脉的总伸长量,其次是量化头颈部手法前定位时的椎动脉伸长量和实际推拿时的椎动脉伸长量。方法在颈椎 C0-C1、C1-C2 和 C2-C3 水平使用压电晶体测量椎动脉应变,压电晶体缝合在三具尸体的左右椎动脉壁上。结果在运动范围测试中,C0-C1 水平最大的平均椎动脉应变为同侧屈旋 6.9%,C1-C2 水平为对侧旋转 4.3%,C2-C3 水平为对侧屈旋 3.7%。在脊椎推拿中,C0-C1、C1-C2 和 C2-C3 水平的平均最大应变分别为 1.3%、0.1% 和 1.0%。推拿前阶段的最大平均椎动脉应变为 0.5%,推拿过程中相应的最大椎动脉应变为 1.1%。解释被动运动范围测试产生的椎动脉应变是脊椎推拿时相应应变的5.3倍(C0-C1)、7.2倍(C1-C2)和3.7倍(C2-C3),这表明脊椎推拿时的椎动脉应变远小于头颈部日常正常运动时可能产生的应变。此外,手法前阶段的椎动脉应变不会导致对侧椎动脉的峰值应变,并有助于减少同侧的应变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of craniocervical posture after myofascial pain treatment in adults with bruxism: A randomized clinical trial How effective is proprioception exercise on pain, grip force, dexterity and proprioception of elbow joint in patients with tennis elbow? A randomized controlled trial Effectiveness of a cervical treatment in wind-instrument musicians with temporomandibular dysfunction: A randomized clinical trial Preventive effect of foam rolling on muscle soreness after exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis Effectiveness of the scapula mobilization technique on the neural mechanosensitivity of the upper limb neural test 1 in individuals with mechanical cervicalgia. A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1