Effectiveness of proactive video therapy for problematic alcohol use on treatment initiation, compliance, and alcohol intake: a randomised controlled trial in Denmark

IF 23.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Lancet Digital Health Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00067-0
Kia Kejlskov Egan MSc , Prof Ulrik Becker DMSc , Sanne Pagh M⊘ller MSc , Veronica Pisinger PhD , Prof Janne Schurmann Tolstrup PhD
{"title":"Effectiveness of proactive video therapy for problematic alcohol use on treatment initiation, compliance, and alcohol intake: a randomised controlled trial in Denmark","authors":"Kia Kejlskov Egan MSc ,&nbsp;Prof Ulrik Becker DMSc ,&nbsp;Sanne Pagh M⊘ller MSc ,&nbsp;Veronica Pisinger PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Janne Schurmann Tolstrup PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00067-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Few people with problematic alcohol use reach treatment and dropout is frequent. Therapy for problematic alcohol use delivered via video conference (e-alcohol therapy) might overcome treatment barriers. In this randomised study, we tested whether proactive e-alcohol therapy outperformed face-to-face alcohol therapy (standard care) regarding treatment initiation, compliance, and weekly alcohol intake at 3-month and 12-month follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this two-arm randomised controlled trial, we recruited individuals who had problematic alcohol use, defined as a score of 8 or more on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; were 18 years or older; and had access to a personal computer, smartphone, or tablet with internet access in Denmark through online advertisements. Participants were assigned to receive alcohol therapy delivered either face-to-face or via video conference. The number, frequency, and duration of therapy sessions were individualised in both groups. Data analysis was conducted using masked data. Primary analyses were based on an intention-to-treat sample. The study is registered with <span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> (<span>NCT03116282</span><svg><path></path></svg>).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between Jan 22, 2018, and June 29, 2020, 816 individuals signed up for the trial and 502 (63%) were assessed for eligibility. We randomly assigned 379 to proactive e-alcohol therapy (n=187) or standard care (n=192), of which, 170 (48%) participants were female and 186 (52%) were male. In the intervention group, more participants initiated treatment (155 [88%] of 177 <em>vs</em> 96 [54%] of 179; odds ratio [OR] 6·3; 95% CI 2·8 to 13·8; p&lt;0·0001 at 3 months; 151 [85%] of 177 <em>vs</em> 115 [64%] of 179; OR 3·2; 95% CI 1·6 to 6·2; p=0·0007 at 12 months) and complied with treatment (130 [73%] of 177 <em>vs</em> 74 [41%] of 179; OR 4·0; 95% CI 2·2 to 7·2; p&lt;0·0001 at 3 months; 140 [79%] of 177 <em>vs</em> 95 [53%] of 179; OR 3·4; 95% CI 1·8 to 6·3; p=0·0002 at 12 months). Weekly alcohol intake was significantly lower in the intervention group only after 3 months (13·0 standard drinks per week <em>vs</em> 21·3 standard drinks per week; adjusted difference –6·7; 95% CI –12·3 to –1·0; p=0·019).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Proactive e-alcohol therapy was associated with increased treatment initiation and compliance and is promising as an easily accessible and effective alcohol treatment for individuals with problematic alcohol use.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>TrygFonden.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000670/pdfft?md5=6791fc7fb00477e6d6469dc31f400771&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024000670-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000670","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Few people with problematic alcohol use reach treatment and dropout is frequent. Therapy for problematic alcohol use delivered via video conference (e-alcohol therapy) might overcome treatment barriers. In this randomised study, we tested whether proactive e-alcohol therapy outperformed face-to-face alcohol therapy (standard care) regarding treatment initiation, compliance, and weekly alcohol intake at 3-month and 12-month follow-up.

Methods

In this two-arm randomised controlled trial, we recruited individuals who had problematic alcohol use, defined as a score of 8 or more on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; were 18 years or older; and had access to a personal computer, smartphone, or tablet with internet access in Denmark through online advertisements. Participants were assigned to receive alcohol therapy delivered either face-to-face or via video conference. The number, frequency, and duration of therapy sessions were individualised in both groups. Data analysis was conducted using masked data. Primary analyses were based on an intention-to-treat sample. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03116282).

Findings

Between Jan 22, 2018, and June 29, 2020, 816 individuals signed up for the trial and 502 (63%) were assessed for eligibility. We randomly assigned 379 to proactive e-alcohol therapy (n=187) or standard care (n=192), of which, 170 (48%) participants were female and 186 (52%) were male. In the intervention group, more participants initiated treatment (155 [88%] of 177 vs 96 [54%] of 179; odds ratio [OR] 6·3; 95% CI 2·8 to 13·8; p<0·0001 at 3 months; 151 [85%] of 177 vs 115 [64%] of 179; OR 3·2; 95% CI 1·6 to 6·2; p=0·0007 at 12 months) and complied with treatment (130 [73%] of 177 vs 74 [41%] of 179; OR 4·0; 95% CI 2·2 to 7·2; p<0·0001 at 3 months; 140 [79%] of 177 vs 95 [53%] of 179; OR 3·4; 95% CI 1·8 to 6·3; p=0·0002 at 12 months). Weekly alcohol intake was significantly lower in the intervention group only after 3 months (13·0 standard drinks per week vs 21·3 standard drinks per week; adjusted difference –6·7; 95% CI –12·3 to –1·0; p=0·019).

Interpretation

Proactive e-alcohol therapy was associated with increased treatment initiation and compliance and is promising as an easily accessible and effective alcohol treatment for individuals with problematic alcohol use.

Funding

TrygFonden.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对问题性饮酒的前瞻性视频疗法对治疗启动、依从性和酒精摄入量的效果:丹麦的随机对照试验
背景有酗酒问题的人很少接受治疗,而且经常辍学。通过视频会议(电子酒精疗法)对问题性饮酒进行治疗可能会克服治疗障碍。在这项随机研究中,我们测试了在 3 个月和 12 个月的随访中,积极主动的电子酒精疗法在治疗启动、依从性和每周酒精摄入量方面是否优于面对面酒精疗法(标准护理)。方法在这项双臂随机对照试验中,我们通过在线广告招募了有问题酒精使用的个人,其定义是酒精使用障碍识别测试中的得分达到或超过 8 分;年龄在 18 岁或以上;在丹麦可以使用个人电脑、智能手机或平板电脑上网。参与者被分配接受面对面或通过视频会议提供的酒精治疗。两组的治疗次数、频率和持续时间都是个性化的。数据分析采用蒙面数据。主要分析基于意向治疗样本。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03116282)上注册。研究结果在2018年1月22日至2020年6月29日期间,共有816人报名参加试验,其中502人(63%)通过了资格评估。我们随机分配了379人接受主动电子酒精疗法(187人)或标准护理(192人),其中170人(48%)为女性,186人(52%)为男性。在干预组中,更多参与者开始接受治疗(177 人中的 155 [88%] 对 179 人中的 96 [54%];3 个月时的几率比 [OR] 6-3;95% CI 2-8 到 13-8;p<0-0001;177 人中的 151 [85%] 对 179 人中的 115 [64%];OR 3-2;95% CI 1-6 到 6-2;12个月时,p=0-0007)和坚持治疗(177人中有130人[73%] vs 179人中有74人[41%];3个月时,OR 4-0;95% CI 2-2 to 7-2;p<0-0001;177人中有140人[79%] vs 179人中有95人[53%];12个月时,OR 3-4; 95% CI 1-8 to 6-3;p=0-0002)。只有在3个月后,干预组的每周酒精摄入量才明显降低(每周13-0标准饮品 vs 每周21-3标准饮品;调整后差异为-6-7;95% CI为-12-3至-1-0;p=0-019)。释义积极的电子酒精疗法与治疗启动率和依从性的提高有关,有望成为针对酗酒问题患者的一种方便有效的酒精治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Digital Health publishes important, innovative, and practice-changing research on any topic connected with digital technology in clinical medicine, public health, and global health. The journal’s open access content crosses subject boundaries, building bridges between health professionals and researchers.By bringing together the most important advances in this multidisciplinary field,The Lancet Digital Health is the most prominent publishing venue in digital health. We publish a range of content types including Articles,Review, Comment, and Correspondence, contributing to promoting digital technologies in health practice worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram for mortality and cardiovascular risk estimation: a model development and validation study COVID-19 testing and reporting behaviours in England across different sociodemographic groups: a population-based study using testing data and data from community prevalence surveillance surveys Fairly evaluating the performance of normative models – Authors' reply Fairly evaluating the performance of normative models Lifting the veil on health datasets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1