Anthropometric Predictors of Appropriate-Sized Plastibell for Neonatal Circumcision.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.4314/ejhs.v33i4.15
Victor Ifeanyichukwu Modekwe, Jideofor Okechukwu Ugwu, Okechukwu Hyginus Ekwunife, Charles Chidiebele Maduba, Ugochukwu Uzodimma Nnadozie, Ezekiel Uchechukwu Nwankwo
{"title":"Anthropometric Predictors of Appropriate-Sized Plastibell for Neonatal Circumcision.","authors":"Victor Ifeanyichukwu Modekwe, Jideofor Okechukwu Ugwu, Okechukwu Hyginus Ekwunife, Charles Chidiebele Maduba, Ugochukwu Uzodimma Nnadozie, Ezekiel Uchechukwu Nwankwo","doi":"10.4314/ejhs.v33i4.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using anthropometric parameters to determine the appropriate Plastibell size before circumcision ensures that cumbersome carrying of all the sizes before each procedure is eliminated and also complications reduced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male neonates who presented for routine circumcision by Plastibell method were recruited. Collected on a proforma were their age in days, weight in Kg, stretched penile length (SPL) in cm, penile diameter (PD) in cm and the Plastibell size used by the \"circumciser\". The routine circumcision was carried out for each neonate according to protocol. P value was set at <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 231 neonates who had Plastibell circumcision. Their mean age, weight, SPL and PD were 15.6(±5.73) days, 3.7(±0.58) Kg, 3.66 (±0.58) cm and 3.79 (±0.64) cm, respectively. Plastibell size 1.3 is the most used (53.6%). There was a positive correlation between weight, SPL, PD, on one hand and Plastibell size , on the other hand with P-values of <0.001, <0.001 and <0.001 respectively. The weight was a weak determinant for Plastibell sizes 1.1 and 1.3: (OR 7.104; 95% CI 1.108 - 45.559; P = .039) and (OR 2.044; 95% CI 1.054 - 3.963; P = .034) respectively. The SPL is also a weak predictor for Plastibell sizes 1.2 and 1.5: (OR 2.176; 95% CI 1.136 -4.136; P = .019) and (OR .043; 95% CI .072 - .984; P = .047), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The anthropometric parameters correlate well with Plastibell sizes. However, they are not effective in predicting the appropriate sized Plastibell for neonatal circumcision.</p>","PeriodicalId":12003,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"33 4","pages":"689-694"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v33i4.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Using anthropometric parameters to determine the appropriate Plastibell size before circumcision ensures that cumbersome carrying of all the sizes before each procedure is eliminated and also complications reduced.

Methods: Male neonates who presented for routine circumcision by Plastibell method were recruited. Collected on a proforma were their age in days, weight in Kg, stretched penile length (SPL) in cm, penile diameter (PD) in cm and the Plastibell size used by the "circumciser". The routine circumcision was carried out for each neonate according to protocol. P value was set at <0.05.

Results: There were 231 neonates who had Plastibell circumcision. Their mean age, weight, SPL and PD were 15.6(±5.73) days, 3.7(±0.58) Kg, 3.66 (±0.58) cm and 3.79 (±0.64) cm, respectively. Plastibell size 1.3 is the most used (53.6%). There was a positive correlation between weight, SPL, PD, on one hand and Plastibell size , on the other hand with P-values of <0.001, <0.001 and <0.001 respectively. The weight was a weak determinant for Plastibell sizes 1.1 and 1.3: (OR 7.104; 95% CI 1.108 - 45.559; P = .039) and (OR 2.044; 95% CI 1.054 - 3.963; P = .034) respectively. The SPL is also a weak predictor for Plastibell sizes 1.2 and 1.5: (OR 2.176; 95% CI 1.136 -4.136; P = .019) and (OR .043; 95% CI .072 - .984; P = .047), respectively.

Conclusion: The anthropometric parameters correlate well with Plastibell sizes. However, they are not effective in predicting the appropriate sized Plastibell for neonatal circumcision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿包皮环切术中适当大小包皮环的人体测量预测因素。
背景:在包皮环切术前使用人体测量参数来确定合适的 Plastibell 大小,可避免每次手术前携带所有尺寸包皮的麻烦,并减少并发症:方法:招募采用 Plastibell 法进行常规包皮环切术的男性新生儿。在表格中收集的信息包括:年龄(天)、体重(千克)、阴茎拉伸长度(SPL)(厘米)、阴茎直径(PD)(厘米)以及 "包皮环切术 "医生使用的 Plastibell 尺寸。每名新生儿都按照方案进行了常规包皮环切术。P 值设定为 结果:共有 231 名新生儿接受了 Plastibell 包皮环切术。他们的平均年龄、体重、SPL和PD分别为15.6(±5.73)天、3.7(±0.58)千克、3.66(±0.58)厘米和3.79(±0.64)厘米。使用最多的是 1.3 号塑性体(53.6%)。一方面,体重、SPL、PD 与 Plastibell 尺寸之间存在正相关,P 值为 结论:人体测量学参数与体重、SPL、PD 和 Plastibell 尺寸之间存在正相关,P 值为 结论:人体测量学参数与体重、SPL、PD 和 Plastibell 尺寸之间存在正相关:人体测量参数与塑性体尺寸有很好的相关性。然而,这些参数并不能有效预测新生儿包皮环切术中合适的阴茎头大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences is a general health science journal addressing clinical medicine, public health and biomedical sciences. Rarely, it covers veterinary medicine
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices among Women of Reproductive Age on Human Papillomavirus Infection, Cervical Cancer and Vaccination in Otukpo, Nigeria. Anemia Prevalence and Socioeconomic Status among Adolescent Girls in Rural Western India: A Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of Parents' Perceptions of the Dental and Oral Health in Children with Disability in the Bandung City. Patient Safety Domains in Primary Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Social Media in Pregnancy Care: Exploring Adoption Factors and Digital Healthcare Information Utilization among Expectant Mothers in Ghana.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1