Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models versus allometric scaling for prediction of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor exposure from adults to children.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1007/s00280-024-04678-0
Maddalena Centanni, Omar Zaher, David Elhad, Mats O Karlsson, Lena E Friberg
{"title":"Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models versus allometric scaling for prediction of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor exposure from adults to children.","authors":"Maddalena Centanni, Omar Zaher, David Elhad, Mats O Karlsson, Lena E Friberg","doi":"10.1007/s00280-024-04678-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Model-based methods can predict pediatric exposure and support initial dose selection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of allometric scaling of population pharmacokinetic (popPK) versus physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in predicting the exposure of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for pediatric patients (≥ 2 years), based on adult data. The drugs imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib were selected as case studies due to their complex PK profiles including high inter-patient variability, active metabolites, time-varying clearances and non-linear absorption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric concentration measurements and adult popPK models were derived from the literature. Adult PBPK models were generated in PK-Sim® using available physicochemical properties, calibrated to adult data when needed. PBPK and popPK models for the pediatric populations were translated from the models for adults and were used to simulate concentration-time profiles that were compared to the observed values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten pediatric datasets were collected from the literature. While both types of models captured the concentration-time profiles of imatinib, its active metabolite, sunitinib and pazopanib, the PBPK models underestimated sunitinib metabolite concentrations. In contrast, allometrically scaled popPK simulations accurately predicted all concentration-time profiles. Trough concentration (C<sub>trough</sub>) predictions from the popPK model fell within a 2-fold range for all compounds, while 3 out of 5 PBPK predictions exceeded this range for the imatinib and sunitinib metabolite concentrations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the identified case studies it appears that allometric scaling of popPK models is better suited to predict exposure of TKIs in pediatric patients ≥ 2 years. This advantage may be attributed to the stable enzyme expression patterns from 2 years old onwards, which can be easily related to adult levels through allometric scaling. In some instances, both methods performed comparably. Understanding where discrepancies between the model methods arise, can further inform model development and ultimately support pediatric dose selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":9556,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"297-310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-024-04678-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Model-based methods can predict pediatric exposure and support initial dose selection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of allometric scaling of population pharmacokinetic (popPK) versus physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in predicting the exposure of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for pediatric patients (≥ 2 years), based on adult data. The drugs imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib were selected as case studies due to their complex PK profiles including high inter-patient variability, active metabolites, time-varying clearances and non-linear absorption.

Methods: Pediatric concentration measurements and adult popPK models were derived from the literature. Adult PBPK models were generated in PK-Sim® using available physicochemical properties, calibrated to adult data when needed. PBPK and popPK models for the pediatric populations were translated from the models for adults and were used to simulate concentration-time profiles that were compared to the observed values.

Results: Ten pediatric datasets were collected from the literature. While both types of models captured the concentration-time profiles of imatinib, its active metabolite, sunitinib and pazopanib, the PBPK models underestimated sunitinib metabolite concentrations. In contrast, allometrically scaled popPK simulations accurately predicted all concentration-time profiles. Trough concentration (Ctrough) predictions from the popPK model fell within a 2-fold range for all compounds, while 3 out of 5 PBPK predictions exceeded this range for the imatinib and sunitinib metabolite concentrations.

Conclusion: Based on the identified case studies it appears that allometric scaling of popPK models is better suited to predict exposure of TKIs in pediatric patients ≥ 2 years. This advantage may be attributed to the stable enzyme expression patterns from 2 years old onwards, which can be easily related to adult levels through allometric scaling. In some instances, both methods performed comparably. Understanding where discrepancies between the model methods arise, can further inform model development and ultimately support pediatric dose selection.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在预测酪氨酸激酶抑制剂从成人到儿童的暴露量时,基于生理学的药代动力学模型与异计量比例。
目的:基于模型的方法可以预测儿科用药暴露量并支持初始剂量选择。本研究的目的是以成人数据为基础,评估群体药代动力学(popPK)与生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型的异速缩放在预测酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)对儿科患者(≥ 2 岁)的暴露量方面的性能。由于伊马替尼、舒尼替尼和帕唑帕尼等药物的PK谱复杂,包括患者间变异性大、有活性代谢物、清除率随时间变化和非线性吸收等,因此被选为案例研究对象:方法:儿科浓度测量值和成人 PBPK 模型均来自文献。成人 PBPK 模型是在 PK-Sim® 中利用现有理化特性生成的,必要时根据成人数据进行校准。儿科人群的 PBPK 和 popPK 模型由成人模型转化而来,用于模拟浓度-时间曲线,并与观察值进行比较:结果:从文献中收集了 10 个儿科数据集。虽然两种模型都能捕捉到伊马替尼、其活性代谢物、舒尼替尼和帕唑帕尼的浓度-时间曲线,但PBPK模型低估了舒尼替尼代谢物的浓度。与此相反,按等比例缩放的 popPK 模拟准确预测了所有浓度-时间曲线。popPK 模型对所有化合物的低谷浓度(Ctrough)预测均在 2 倍范围内,而对伊马替尼和舒尼替尼代谢物浓度的预测,5 个 PBPK 预测中有 3 个超出了这一范围:根据已确定的案例研究,popPK 模型的异计量比例似乎更适合预测 TKIs 在年龄≥ 2 岁的儿科患者中的暴露情况。这种优势可能是由于从 2 岁起酶的表达模式比较稳定,通过异速缩放可以很容易地将其与成人水平联系起来。在某些情况下,两种方法的表现不相上下。了解模型方法之间出现差异的原因,可以进一步为模型开发提供信息,并最终为儿科剂量选择提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Addressing a wide range of pharmacologic and oncologic concerns on both experimental and clinical levels, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology is an eminent journal in the field. The primary focus in this rapid publication medium is on new anticancer agents, their experimental screening, preclinical toxicology and pharmacology, single and combined drug administration modalities, and clinical phase I, II and III trials. It is essential reading for pharmacologists and oncologists giving results recorded in the following areas: clinical toxicology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, and indications for chemotherapy in cancer treatment strategy.
期刊最新文献
Retraction Note: NO donor inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis by targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MEK/ERK pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hypoalbuminemia in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: relation to asparaginase therapy and impact on high dose methotrexate elimination. Phase I-II study of OBI-888, a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody against the tumor-associated carbohydrate antigen Globo H, in patients with advanced solid tumors. A comparison of the renal function biomarkers serum creatinine, pro-enkephalin and cystatin C to predict clearance of pemetrexed. An intracerebral microdialysis study to determine the neuropharmacokinetics of eribulin in patients with metastatic or primary brain tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1