Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology最新文献

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer and is frequently resistant to therapy, ultimately resulting in treatment failure. Clinical trials have demonstrated the potential of sensitizing radiation therapy (RT)-resistant TNBC through the combination of chemotherapy and RT. This study sought to explore the potential of CD151 as a therapy response marker in the co-treatment strategy involving ionizing radiation (IR) and the repurposed antiviral drug 2-Thio-6-azauridine (TAU) for sensitizing RT-resistant TNBC (TNBC/RR).

Methods: The investigation encompassed a variety of assessments, including viability using MTT and LDH assays, cell proliferation through BrdU incorporation and clonogenic assays, cell cycle analysis via flow cytometry, cell migration using wound scratch and Boyden chamber invasion assays, DNA damage assessment through γH2AX analysis, apoptosis evaluation through acridine-orange and ethidium bromide double staining assays, as well as caspase 3 activity measurement using a colorimetric assay. CD151 expression was examined through ELISA, flow cytometry and RT-qPCR.

Results: The results showed a significant reduction in TNBC/RR cell viability following co-treatment. Moreover, the co-treatment reduced cell migration, induced apoptosis, downregulated CD151 expression, and increased caspase 3 activity in TNBC/RR cells. Additionally, CD151 was predicted to serve as a therapy response marker for co-treatment with TAU and IR.

Conclusion: These findings suggest the potential of combination treatment with IR and TAU as a promising strategy to overcome RT resistance in TNBC. Furthermore, CD151 emerges as a valuable therapy response marker for chemoradiotherapy.

Purpose: Overexpression of galectin-3, a β-galactoside-binding lectin, is associated with fibrotic diseases and cancer. Selvigaltin is an oral galectin-3 inhibitor, previously administered as a 50 mg capsule. This study aimed to evaluate the relative bioavailability and food effect of selvigaltin as a 100 mg tablet in healthy volunteers.

Methods: In this single-dose, randomized, three-period, crossover study (GALBA-1; NCT05747573), participants received selvigaltin as a 100 mg tablet (under fasted and fed conditions) or as two 50 mg capsules (under fasted conditions). Primary endpoints included plasma and urine pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Secondary endpoints were safety and tolerability.

Results: Of the 13 enrolled participants, 12 completed the study. Under fasted conditions, geometric mean maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) and systemic exposure (AUC_0─inf) of selvigaltin were 161.0% and 84.0% higher, respectively, after administration of a tablet vs. capsules. Under fed vs. fasted conditions, geometric mean C_max of the selvigaltin tablet was 20.0% lower, whereas AUC_0─inf was unaffected. Geometric mean percentage of total dose of selvigaltin excreted in urine over 0─96 h was 30.3% and 35.9% for the tablet under fasted and fed conditions, respectively, and 14.5% for the capsules. No treatment-emergent severe or serious adverse events or study discontinuations due to a treatment-emergent adverse event were reported.

Conclusion: The tablet formulation of selvigaltin displayed higher bioavailability vs. the capsule formulation, with minimal effect of food on PK. Selvigaltin was well-tolerated during all treatments. These findings warrant further clinical development of the tablet formulation of selvigaltin without specific food restrictions.

Clinical trial registration: NCT05747573; February 28, 2023.

Purpose: Envonalkib (TQ-B3139) is a novel, potent anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. This phase I mass balance study investigated the pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of ¹⁴C-radiolabeled envonalkib in healthy Chinese male subjects.

Methods: A single oral dose of 600 mg (150 µCi) [¹⁴C]envonalkib was administered to healthy male subjects under fasted state. Samples of blood, urine and feces were collected for quantitative determination of total radioactivity and unchanged envonalkib, and the metabolites identification.

Results: After dosing, the median T_max of radioactivity was 4 h and the mean t_1/2 was 65.2 h in plasma. The exposure of total radioactivity was much higher than that of unchanged envonalkib in plasma. The mean total recovery of the radiolabeled dose was 93.93% over 504 h post-dose, with 15.23% in urine and 78.71% in feces. Envonalkib underwent extensive metabolism and a total of 15 metabolites were identified in plasma, urine, and feces. Unchanged envonalkib and its major metabolite M315 were the main components in plasma, accounting for 20.37% and 33.33% of total plasma radioactivity. In urine, O-dealkylation metabolite M315 was the major component accounted for 7.98% of dose. In feces, 16.01% of dose was excreted as cysteine conjugate M434-1. Envonalkib was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events observed in the study.

Conclusion: Envonalkib was extensively metabolized prior to excretion and eliminated primarily as metabolites via feces.

Purpose: Nivolumab is approved at various doses, including 3 mg/kg, 240 mg and 480 mg flat doses at various dosing intervals. The concept of low-dose immunotherapy is gaining traction in recent years. However, there is a need to better understand the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes at lower doses.

Methods: Patients were either administered 40 mg flat dose or 3 mg/kg Q2W/Q3W, depending on affordability as per prevailing hospital practice. All patients were hospitalized on day 1 and pharmacokinetic samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1.0, 6.0, 24.0, 72.0 h and day 14 following administration of the first dose of nivolumab. Plasma nivolumab levels were measured by ELISA. Patients were followed up for response and toxicity.

Results: Twenty five patients were included in the study. Fourteen received nivolumab at conventional dose (3 mg/kg), while 11 patients received low-dose (40 mg flat). The geometric means of dose normalized C_max and AUC_0-t were comparable between those who received conventional dose and low-dose of nivolumab (0.28 versus 0.23 µg/mL/mg and 0.0014 versus 0.0011 d/mL respectively). Nineteen patients were evaluable for response. ORR among patients who received conventional dose was 5/11 (45.5%) whereas it was 4/9 (44.4%) in the low-dose cohort. All 14 (100%) patients in conventional dosing group and 7/11 patients (63.64%) in low-dose group had treatment emergent adverse events. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities were observed in 4/14 patients in conventional dose group and none in low-dose group.

Conclusion: Low-dose nivolumab leads to lower exposure in patients as compared with conventional dose, but low-dose was better tolerated, while response rates were comparable to conventional dose.

Background: The role of selinexor, a targeted inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma is not yet fully understood. This study conducted comprehensive in vitro and in vivo investigations to elucidate the effects of selinexor on cholangiocarcinoma, with a focus on its mechanistic relationship with the cellular localization of Paternally Expressed Gene 3 (PEG3).

Methods: A patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model was established using samples from a cholangiocarcinoma patient in immunodeficient mice to assess the in vivo effects of selinexor. Additionally, cholangiocarcinoma cell lines HuCC-T1 and BRE were cultured to evaluate selinexor's impact on cell proliferation, invasion, migration, cell cycle, and apoptosis. HuCC-T1 cells were also implanted in immunodeficient mice for further investigation. Immunofluorescence and Western blotting were employed to observe the expression and localization of the PEG3 protein.

Results: The results demonstrated that selinexor significantly inhibited tumor growth in the cholangiocarcinoma PDX model and promoted the accumulation of PEG3 protein within the nuclei of tumor cells. In vitro experiments showed that selinexor effectively suppressed cholangiocarcinoma cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, while also impeding the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis. Notably, selinexor markedly facilitated the nuclear accumulation of PEG3 protein in cholangiocarcinoma cells. However, when PEG3 expression was knocked down, the effects of selinexor on cholangiocarcinoma were significantly reversed.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that selinexor inhibits the progression of cholangiocarcinoma by targeting XPO1 and promoting the nuclear accumulation of PEG3 protein, thereby hindering the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis.

Trastuzumab is a potent targeted therapy drug for HER2-positive cancer patients. A comprehensive understanding of trastuzumab's mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and steady-state exposure in different treatment regimens and administration routes is essential for a thorough evaluation of the drug's safety and effectiveness. Due to the distinctive pharmacokinetics, indications, and administration methods of trastuzumab, this understanding becomes crucial. Drug exposure can be assessed by measuring trastuzumab's peak concentration, trough concentration, or area under the curve through assays like enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The dose-response (D-R) and exposure-response (E-R) relationships establish the correlation between drug dosage/exposure and the therapeutic effect and safety. Additionally, various covariates such as body weight, aspartate transaminase, and albumin levels can influence drug exposure. This review provides a comprehensive overview of trastuzumab's mechanism of action, data on steady-state concentration and PK parameters under multiple administration routes and indications, discussions on factors influencing PK parameters, and evaluations of the effectiveness and safety of E-R and D-R in diverse HER2-positive cancer patients.

Purpose: Osteosarcoma is a rare tumor with an incidence of 4.4 cases per million per year in adolescent. High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is the standard first-line chemotherapeutic agent for osteosarcoma. However, its efficacy can vary significantly among individuals due to wide pharmacokinetic variability. Despite this, only a few population pharmacokinetics (popPK) models based on Chinese patients with osteosarcoma have been reported. Thus, this study aimed to develop a HD-MTX popPK model and an individual model-based dose optimizer for osteosarcoma therapy.

Method: A total of 680 MTX serum concentrations from 57 patients with osteosarcoma were measured at the end of MTX infusion and 10 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after the start of infusion. Using the first-order conditional estimation method with NONMEM, a popPK model was estimated. Goodness-of-fit plots, visual predictive checks, and bootstrap analysis were generated to evaluate the final model. A dose optimizer tool was developed based on the validated models using R Shiny. Additionally, clinical data from 12 patients with newly diagnosed osteosarcoma were collected and used as the validation set to preliminarily verify the predictive ability of the popPK model and the dose optimizer tool.

Results: Body surface area (BSA) was the most significant covariate for compartment distribution. Creatinine clearance (CrCL) and co-administration of NSAIDs were introduced as predictors for central compartmental and peripheral compartmental clearance, respectively. Co-administration of NSAIDs was associated with significantly higher MTX concentrations at 72 h (p = 0.019). The dose optimizer tool exhibited a high consistency in predicting MTX AUC compared to the actual AUC (r = 0.821, p < 0.001) in the validation set.

Conclusion: The dose optimizer tool could be used to estimate individual PK parameters, and optimize personalized MTX therapy in particular patients.

Introduction: Regorafenib is an oral protein kinase inhinitor approved fot the treatment of metastatic colorecral cancer. We present a first successful case of desensitization in regorafenib-related fix-drug eruption in the literature.

Case report: A 44-year-old female patient was diagnosed with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. The patient received regorafenib treatment for malignancy recurrence. The patient was admitted to adult allergy clinic with developing recurrent fix drug eruption in the second cycle, on the 10th day of regorafenib treatment. The patient was given the third cycle of regorafenib treatment with a 6-day desensitization protocol, the first day of which consisted of 6 steps and and the third cycle was successfully completed.

Management and outcome: Regorafenib-mediated delayed hypersensitivity reactions occur less frequently and and regorafenib hypersensitivity reactions are difficult to manage and experience is limited. This is the first successful desensitization protocol developed by us for regorafenib-related fix drug eruption and more cases are needed to be reported to confirm the desensitization protocol.

Discussion: There is only one successful regorafenib desensitization protocol for severe delayed hypersensivity reaction in the literature, but there is no protocol developed for mild type delayed hypersensivity reaction. The management of fix-drug eruption primarily involves discontinuation and avoidance of the offending drug but our patient had a mild delayed-type reaction and there was no alternative to regarofenib treatment. We developed the rapid 6-step desensitization protocol (Day 1). According to this protocol, the patient was able to continue regorafenib treatment successfully.

Purpose: Eribulin is an inhibitor of microtubule dynamics. It is not as highly protein bound as the taxanes and is less vulnerable to extrusion by P-glycoprotein in the blood-brain barrier (BBB). These features predict that eribulin could play an active role in managing brain tumors. Indeed, the small amount of published clinical data indicates eribulin may have some efficacy against breast cancer brain metastases. To better understand the potential of eribulin for treating brain tumors, we performed an intracerebral microdialysis study to determine the neuropharmacokinetics of eribulin in cancer patients undergoing tumor resection.

Methods: After tumor removal, two microdialysis catheters were inserted into peritumoral brain tissue. Approximately 24 h after surgery, a single dose of eribulin 1.4 mg/m² was administered intravenously. Dialysate samples were collected continuously for 72 h, with plasma samples collected in parallel. Eribulin concentrations were analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry.

Results: Dialysate samples from 12 intracerebral microdialysis catheters placed in 7 study participants were included in the analysis. A statistically significant difference was observed between eribulin concentrations in brain tissue where BBB was disrupted versus intact, with a difference in mean maximum concentrations on log₂ scale of 3.37 (std err = 0.59, p-value = 0.005). Nonetheless, overall brain to plasma ratios of eribulin only ranged from 0.13 to 1.99%.

Conclusion: Although we could detect higher concentrations of eribulin in brain tissue where BBB was disrupted, intracerebral eribulin levels were not sufficient to predict eribulin would have consistent clinically meaningful activity against tumors in the brain.

Clinicaltrials:

Gov identifier: NCT02338037 (January 9, 2015).