“Percentage” and “size” of residual viable tumor in lymph node, the performance in estimating pathologic response of lymph node in non-small cell lung cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy

Abstract

There is no universally accepted method for evaluating lymph node metastasis (LNM) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Different protocols recommend evaluating the percentage of residual viable tumor (RVT%) and metastatic tumor size (MTS). Our aim was to determine the prognostic significance of RVT% and MTS, and identify the more effective parameter for pathological evaluating LNM. Two independent cohorts were collected (derivation, n = 84; external validation, n = 42). All patients exhibited metastatic cancer or treatment response in lymph nodes post-surgery. In the derivation cohort, we assessed the mean and largest values of MTS and RVT% in LNM, estimating their optimal cutoffs for event-free survival (EFS) using maximally selected rank statistics. Validation was subsequently conducted in the external validation cohort. The quality of prognostic factors was evaluated using the Area Under Curve (AUC). A positive association was identified between RVT% and MTS, but an absolute association could not be conclusively established. In the derivation cohort, neither the largest MTS (cutoff = 6 mm, p = 0.28), largest RVT% (cutoff = 75%, p = 0.23), nor mean RVT% (cutoff = 55%, p = 0.06) were associated with EFS. However, mean MTS (cutoff = 4.5 mm) in lymph nodes was statistically associated with EFS (p = 0.018), validated by the external cohort (p = 0.017). The prognostic value of MTS exceeded that of ypN staging in both cohorts, as evidenced by higher AUC values. The mean value of MTS can effectively serve as a parameter for the pathological evaluation of lymph nodes, with a threshold of 4.5 mm, closely linked to EFS. Its prognostic value outperforms that of ypN staging.