Effect of Nuts on Anthropometric and Glycemic Indexes and Blood Pressure in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition reviews Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuae054
Ângela C Bersch-Ferreira, Camila Weschenfelder, Gustavo Waclawovsky, Lucas R da Silva, Elana Stein, Rachel H V Machado, Mabel F Figueiro, Erica A Suzumura, Renato H N Santos, Graziela Biude Silva Duarte, Marcelo M Rogero, Erlon O de Abreu-Silva, Alexandre B Cavalcanti, Aline Marcadenti
{"title":"Effect of Nuts on Anthropometric and Glycemic Indexes and Blood Pressure in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Ângela C Bersch-Ferreira, Camila Weschenfelder, Gustavo Waclawovsky, Lucas R da Silva, Elana Stein, Rachel H V Machado, Mabel F Figueiro, Erica A Suzumura, Renato H N Santos, Graziela Biude Silva Duarte, Marcelo M Rogero, Erlon O de Abreu-Silva, Alexandre B Cavalcanti, Aline Marcadenti","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Nut-enriched diets have a positive impact on cardiovascular risk factors, such as body mass, blood pressure, and fasting blood glucose. However, studies in individuals undergoing secondary cardiovascular prevention show controversial results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review with meta-analysis assessed the effect of nut supplementation on anthropometric, glycemic, and blood pressure indices in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, as well as the frequency of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Six databases were used for the search-PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, BVS (Biblioteca Virtual da Saude), Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov-until February 2023, with no language restrictions.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions methodology and the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Setting/design) strategy were used. Seven independent reviewers were involved in data extraction and resolution of disagreements. Certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>From 5187 records identified, 6 publications containing data referring to 5 randomized clinical trials (n = 436) were included in the final analyses. The nuts evaluated were almonds, pecans, Brazil nuts, and mixed nuts, with portions that varied between 5 g and 85 g (median: 30 g/day). The intervention period varied between 6 and 12 weeks. The nuts had no effect on fasting glucose and anthropometric indices, although the certainty of the evidence for most of these outcomes was low or very low. They also had no effect on systolic (mean difference [MD]: -1.16 mmHg [95% CI, -5.68 to 3.35], I2 = 0%-moderate certainty of evidence) or diastolic (MD: 0.10 mmHg [95% CI, -2.30 to 2.51], I2 = 0%-high certainty of evidence) blood pressure. It was not possible to aggregate data on adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nut supplementation had no effect on blood pressure, fasting glucose, or anthropometric profile in the context of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42020163456.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Nut-enriched diets have a positive impact on cardiovascular risk factors, such as body mass, blood pressure, and fasting blood glucose. However, studies in individuals undergoing secondary cardiovascular prevention show controversial results.

Objective: This systematic review with meta-analysis assessed the effect of nut supplementation on anthropometric, glycemic, and blood pressure indices in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, as well as the frequency of adverse events.

Data sources: Six databases were used for the search-PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, BVS (Biblioteca Virtual da Saude), Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov-until February 2023, with no language restrictions.

Data extraction: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions methodology and the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Setting/design) strategy were used. Seven independent reviewers were involved in data extraction and resolution of disagreements. Certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system.

Data analysis: From 5187 records identified, 6 publications containing data referring to 5 randomized clinical trials (n = 436) were included in the final analyses. The nuts evaluated were almonds, pecans, Brazil nuts, and mixed nuts, with portions that varied between 5 g and 85 g (median: 30 g/day). The intervention period varied between 6 and 12 weeks. The nuts had no effect on fasting glucose and anthropometric indices, although the certainty of the evidence for most of these outcomes was low or very low. They also had no effect on systolic (mean difference [MD]: -1.16 mmHg [95% CI, -5.68 to 3.35], I2 = 0%-moderate certainty of evidence) or diastolic (MD: 0.10 mmHg [95% CI, -2.30 to 2.51], I2 = 0%-high certainty of evidence) blood pressure. It was not possible to aggregate data on adverse events.

Conclusion: Nut supplementation had no effect on blood pressure, fasting glucose, or anthropometric profile in the context of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42020163456.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坚果对心血管二级预防中人体测量和血糖指数及血压的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
背景:营养丰富的膳食对心血管风险因素,如体重、血压和空腹血糖有积极影响。然而,针对心血管二级预防人群的研究结果却存在争议:本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了坚果补充剂对动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的人体测量、血糖和血压指数的影响,以及不良事件的发生频率:检索使用了六个数据库--PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、BVS(Biblioteca Virtual da Saude)、Web of Science 和 ClinicalTrials.gov--直至 2023 年 2 月,无语言限制:采用《Cochrane干预措施系统综述手册》方法和 PICOS(人群、干预措施、比较、结果、设置/设计)策略。七位独立审稿人参与了数据提取和分歧解决。采用 GRADE(建议评估、发展和评价分级)系统对证据的确定性进行评估:从已确定的 5187 条记录中,有 6 份出版物包含 5 项随机临床试验的数据(n = 436)被纳入最终分析。评估的坚果有杏仁、山核桃、巴西坚果和混合坚果,份量从 5 克到 85 克不等(中位数:30 克/天)。干预期从 6 周到 12 周不等。坚果对空腹血糖和人体测量指数没有影响,但大多数结果的证据确定性较低或很低。坚果对收缩压(平均差 [MD]:-1.16 mmHg [95% CI,-5.68 至 3.35],I2 = 0%-中度证据确定性)或舒张压(MD:0.10 mmHg [95% CI,-2.30 至 2.51],I2 = 0%-高度证据确定性)也没有影响。无法汇总不良事件数据:结论:补充坚果对动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的血压、空腹血糖或人体测量特征没有影响:系统综述注册:PROSPERO 注册编号CRD42020163456。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of the Beneficial Effects of Berry Extracts on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Animal Models. Health Benefits From Diets High in Salicylates May Arise From Improved Utilization of Dietary Copper. The Longitudinal Evidence on Social Ties and Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Aging Adults: A Systematic Review. The psychological basis of hunger and its dysfunctions. Correction to: Menatetrenone (Vitamin K2) and Bone Quality in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1