Multiple object tracking in the presence of a goal: Attentional anticipation and suppression.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Vision Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1167/jov.24.5.10
Andrea Frielink-Loing, Arno Koning, Rob van Lier
{"title":"Multiple object tracking in the presence of a goal: Attentional anticipation and suppression.","authors":"Andrea Frielink-Loing, Arno Koning, Rob van Lier","doi":"10.1167/jov.24.5.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In previous studies, we found that tracking multiple objects involves anticipatory attention, especially in the linear direction, even when a target bounced against a wall. We also showed that active involvement, in which the wall was replaced by a controllable paddle, resulted in increased allocation of attention to the bounce direction. In the current experiments, we wanted to further investigate the potential influence of the valence of the heading of an object. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were instructed to catch targets with a movable goal. In Experiment 3, participants were instructed to manipulate the permeability of a static wall in order to let targets either approach goals (i.e., green goals) or avoid goals (i.e., red goals). The results of Experiment 1 showed that probe detection ahead of a target that moved in the direction of the goal was higher as compared to probe detection in the direction of a no-goal area. Experiment 2 provided further evidence that the attentional highlighting found in the first experiment depends on the movement direction toward the goal. In Experiment 3, we found that not so much the positive (or neutral) valence (here, the green and no-goal areas) led to increased allocation of attention but rather a negative valence (here the red goals) led to a decreased allocation of attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"24 5","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.5.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In previous studies, we found that tracking multiple objects involves anticipatory attention, especially in the linear direction, even when a target bounced against a wall. We also showed that active involvement, in which the wall was replaced by a controllable paddle, resulted in increased allocation of attention to the bounce direction. In the current experiments, we wanted to further investigate the potential influence of the valence of the heading of an object. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were instructed to catch targets with a movable goal. In Experiment 3, participants were instructed to manipulate the permeability of a static wall in order to let targets either approach goals (i.e., green goals) or avoid goals (i.e., red goals). The results of Experiment 1 showed that probe detection ahead of a target that moved in the direction of the goal was higher as compared to probe detection in the direction of a no-goal area. Experiment 2 provided further evidence that the attentional highlighting found in the first experiment depends on the movement direction toward the goal. In Experiment 3, we found that not so much the positive (or neutral) valence (here, the green and no-goal areas) led to increased allocation of attention but rather a negative valence (here the red goals) led to a decreased allocation of attention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目标存在时的多目标追踪:注意的预期和抑制。
在之前的研究中,我们发现跟踪多个物体需要预期注意,尤其是在直线方向上,即使目标弹到墙上也是如此。我们的研究还表明,主动参与(用可控桨代替墙壁)会增加对反弹方向的注意力分配。在当前的实验中,我们希望进一步研究目标方向的价值可能产生的影响。在实验 1 和 2 中,我们要求被试抓住一个可移动的目标。在实验 3 中,参与者被要求操纵静态墙壁的渗透性,以便让目标接近目标(即绿色目标)或避开目标(即红色目标)。实验 1 的结果表明,与在无目标区域方向上的探针探测相比,在向目标方向移动的目标前方的探针探测率更高。实验 2 进一步证明,第一个实验中发现的注意力高亮度取决于目标的移动方向。在实验 3 中,我们发现并不是积极(或中性)情绪(此处为绿色和无目标区域)导致注意力分配增加,而是消极情绪(此处为红色目标)导致注意力分配减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
期刊最新文献
Individual differences reveal similarities in serial dependence effects across perceptual tasks, but not to oculomotor tasks. Investigating the relationship between subjective perception and unconscious feature integration. Binocular integration of chromatic and luminance signals. Deep convolutional neural networks are sensitive to face configuration. How the window of visibility varies around polar angle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1