Inpatient Corridor Visibility and Care Team Communication.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1177/19375867241250331
Julie Zook, Rachel Culpeper, Jennifer Worley, Chase Miller
{"title":"Inpatient Corridor Visibility and Care Team Communication.","authors":"Julie Zook, Rachel Culpeper, Jennifer Worley, Chase Miller","doi":"10.1177/19375867241250331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article aims to investigate the impact of fine-grained differences in unit layout on care staff corridor communication.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Corridor design can be undertaken with greater emphasis on space and cost efficiency or with greater emphasis on affording quality knowledge workspace. Building on prior research on care team communication and inpatient unit design, this study aims to gain a better understanding of how corridor layout properties affect care team communication.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study used space syntax analysis to characterize inpatient unit design, specifically floor-plan layout. Two approaches were used to capture care team communication: behavior mapping with recording of care team member locations and whether they were communicating and the HDR CARE Scale, Inpatient Version. The two units were part of a vertical tower expansion project, and, though constructed at separate times, they maintain the same organizational culture, floor plate, and location of key vertical elements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The newer unit was found to be more visually open using three measures from space syntax. More nursing staff verbal communication was observed on this unit. Across both units, nursing staff were more likely to be observed verbally communicating in locations that were more visually connected (i.e., at locations with larger viewsheds). There were no significant differences between nursing staff self-report on work using the HDR CARE Scale, Inpatient Version.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that care team communication may tend to be encouraged by visual connectivity that can be promoted through floor-plan layout.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":"54-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867241250331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This article aims to investigate the impact of fine-grained differences in unit layout on care staff corridor communication.

Background: Corridor design can be undertaken with greater emphasis on space and cost efficiency or with greater emphasis on affording quality knowledge workspace. Building on prior research on care team communication and inpatient unit design, this study aims to gain a better understanding of how corridor layout properties affect care team communication.

Method: This study used space syntax analysis to characterize inpatient unit design, specifically floor-plan layout. Two approaches were used to capture care team communication: behavior mapping with recording of care team member locations and whether they were communicating and the HDR CARE Scale, Inpatient Version. The two units were part of a vertical tower expansion project, and, though constructed at separate times, they maintain the same organizational culture, floor plate, and location of key vertical elements.

Results: The newer unit was found to be more visually open using three measures from space syntax. More nursing staff verbal communication was observed on this unit. Across both units, nursing staff were more likely to be observed verbally communicating in locations that were more visually connected (i.e., at locations with larger viewsheds). There were no significant differences between nursing staff self-report on work using the HDR CARE Scale, Inpatient Version.

Conclusion: We conclude that care team communication may tend to be encouraged by visual connectivity that can be promoted through floor-plan layout.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院病人走廊可见度和护理团队沟通。
目的:本文旨在研究病房布局的细微差别对护理人员走廊交流的影响:本文旨在研究单元布局的细微差别对护理人员走廊交流的影响:走廊设计可以更加注重空间和成本效益,也可以更加注重提供高质量的知识工作空间。本研究以之前关于护理团队沟通和住院部设计的研究为基础,旨在更好地了解走廊布局的特性如何影响护理团队的沟通:本研究采用空间句法分析来描述住院部设计的特点,特别是平面布局。研究采用了两种方法来捕捉护理团队的沟通情况:记录护理团队成员位置和是否进行沟通的行为图谱,以及 HDR 护理量表(住院版)。这两个单元是垂直塔楼扩建项目的一部分,虽然建造时间不同,但它们保持了相同的组织文化、楼板和关键垂直元素的位置:结果:通过空间综合法的三项测量,发现较新的病房在视觉上更加开放。在新病房,护理人员的口头交流更多。在两个病房中,护理人员更有可能在视觉联系更紧密的位置(即视野更大的位置)进行口头交流。护理人员使用 HDR CARE 量表(住院病人版)进行的工作自我报告之间没有明显差异:我们得出的结论是,护理团队的沟通可能会受到视觉连接性的影响,而视觉连接性可以通过平面布局来促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
22.70%
发文量
82
期刊最新文献
Trauma-Informed Design: Lessons Through a Life-Altering Lens. The Study on the Chinese Environmental Audit Tool (C-EAT) for Long-Term Care Facilities. Design of a Cancer Infusion Center: Results from a Pre- and Post-Occupancy Evaluation. Sources of Innovation in Healthcare Design: How Can it Happen? Baseline Study of Ultra-Clean Air Change Rate, Number, and Type of Microorganisms and Level of Particles During Trauma Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1