Identification of a Single-Dose, Low-Flip-Angle-Based CBV Threshold for Fractional Tumor Burden Mapping in Recurrent Glioblastoma.

Aliya Anil, Ashley M Stokes, John P Karis, Laura C Bell, Jennifer Eschbacher, Kristofer Jennings, Melissa A Prah, Leland S Hu, Jerrold L Boxerman, Kathleen M Schmainda, C Chad Quarles
{"title":"Identification of a Single-Dose, Low-Flip-Angle-Based CBV Threshold for Fractional Tumor Burden Mapping in Recurrent Glioblastoma.","authors":"Aliya Anil, Ashley M Stokes, John P Karis, Laura C Bell, Jennifer Eschbacher, Kristofer Jennings, Melissa A Prah, Leland S Hu, Jerrold L Boxerman, Kathleen M Schmainda, C Chad Quarles","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>DSC-MR imaging can be used to generate fractional tumor burden (FTB) maps via application of relative CBV thresholds to spatially differentiate glioblastoma recurrence from posttreatment radiation effects (PTRE). Image-localized histopathology was previously used to validate FTB maps derived from a reference DSC-MR imaging protocol by using preload, a moderate flip angle (MFA, 60°), and postprocessing leakage correction. Recently, a DSC-MR imaging protocol with a low flip angle (LFA, 30°) with no preload was shown to provide leakage-corrected relative CBV (rCBV) equivalent to the reference protocol. This study aimed to identify the rCBV thresholds for the LFA protocol that generate the most accurate FTB maps, concordant with those obtained from the reference MFA protocol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-two patients with grade-IV glioblastoma who had prior surgical resection and received chemotherapy and radiation therapy were included in the study. Two sets of DSC-MR imaging data were collected sequentially first by using LFA protocol with no preload, which served as the preload for the subsequent MFA protocol. Standardized relative CBV maps (sRCBV) were obtained for each patient and coregistered with the anatomic postcontrast T1-weighted images. The reference MFA-based FTB maps were computed by using previously published sRCBV thresholds (1.0 and 1.56). A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was conducted to identify the optimal, voxelwise LFA sRCBV thresholds, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the LFA-based FTB maps were computed with respect to the MFA-based reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean sRCBV values of tumors across patients exhibited strong agreement (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.99) between the 2 protocols. Using the ROC analysis, the optimal lower LFA threshold that accurately distinguishes PTRE from tumor recurrence was found to be 1.0 (sensitivity: 87.77%; specificity: 90.22%), equivalent to the ground truth. To identify aggressive tumor regions, the ROC analysis identified an upper LFA threshold of 1.37 (sensitivity: 90.87%; specificity: 91.10%) for the reference MFA threshold of 1.56.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For LFA-based FTB maps, an sRCBV threshold of 1.0 and 1.37 can differentiate PTRE from recurrent tumors. FTB maps aid in surgical planning, guiding pathologic diagnosis and treatment strategies in the recurrent setting. This study further confirms the reliability of single-dose LFA-based DSC-MR imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: DSC-MR imaging can be used to generate fractional tumor burden (FTB) maps via application of relative CBV thresholds to spatially differentiate glioblastoma recurrence from posttreatment radiation effects (PTRE). Image-localized histopathology was previously used to validate FTB maps derived from a reference DSC-MR imaging protocol by using preload, a moderate flip angle (MFA, 60°), and postprocessing leakage correction. Recently, a DSC-MR imaging protocol with a low flip angle (LFA, 30°) with no preload was shown to provide leakage-corrected relative CBV (rCBV) equivalent to the reference protocol. This study aimed to identify the rCBV thresholds for the LFA protocol that generate the most accurate FTB maps, concordant with those obtained from the reference MFA protocol.

Materials and methods: Fifty-two patients with grade-IV glioblastoma who had prior surgical resection and received chemotherapy and radiation therapy were included in the study. Two sets of DSC-MR imaging data were collected sequentially first by using LFA protocol with no preload, which served as the preload for the subsequent MFA protocol. Standardized relative CBV maps (sRCBV) were obtained for each patient and coregistered with the anatomic postcontrast T1-weighted images. The reference MFA-based FTB maps were computed by using previously published sRCBV thresholds (1.0 and 1.56). A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was conducted to identify the optimal, voxelwise LFA sRCBV thresholds, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the LFA-based FTB maps were computed with respect to the MFA-based reference.

Results: The mean sRCBV values of tumors across patients exhibited strong agreement (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.99) between the 2 protocols. Using the ROC analysis, the optimal lower LFA threshold that accurately distinguishes PTRE from tumor recurrence was found to be 1.0 (sensitivity: 87.77%; specificity: 90.22%), equivalent to the ground truth. To identify aggressive tumor regions, the ROC analysis identified an upper LFA threshold of 1.37 (sensitivity: 90.87%; specificity: 91.10%) for the reference MFA threshold of 1.56.

Conclusions: For LFA-based FTB maps, an sRCBV threshold of 1.0 and 1.37 can differentiate PTRE from recurrent tumors. FTB maps aid in surgical planning, guiding pathologic diagnosis and treatment strategies in the recurrent setting. This study further confirms the reliability of single-dose LFA-based DSC-MR imaging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为复发性胶质母细胞瘤的肿瘤负荷分数(FTB)绘图确定基于单剂量、低翻转角的CBV阈值。
背景和目的:通过应用相对 CBV 阈值,DSC-MRI 可用来生成分数肿瘤负荷(FTB)图,以在空间上区分胶质母细胞瘤复发和治疗后辐射效应(PTRE)。以前曾使用图像定位组织病理学来验证参考DSC-MRI方案得出的FTB图,该方案使用预负荷、中等翻转角(MFA,60°)和后处理渗漏校正。最近,一项无预载的低翻转角(LFA,30°)DSC-MRI 方案被证明可提供与参考方案相当的泄漏校正 RCBV。本研究旨在确定 LFA 方案的 RCBV 阈值,该阈值可生成最准确的 FTB 图,与参考 MFA 方案获得的图谱一致:研究纳入了 52 名 IV 级 GBM 患者,他们之前接受过手术切除和化疗及放疗。研究人员首先使用无预载的 LFA 方案连续采集了两组 DSC-MRI 数据,作为随后 MFA 方案的预载。为每位患者绘制标准化的相对 CBV 图(sRCBV),并与解剖对比后 T1 加权图像共同注册。基于 MFA 的参考 FTB 图使用之前公布的 sRCBV 阈值(1.0 和 1.56)计算。通过 ROC 分析确定了最佳的 LFA sRCBV 阈值,并计算了基于 LFA 的 FTB 地图相对于基于 MFA 的参考地图的灵敏度、特异性和准确性:结果:两种方案之间患者肿瘤的平均 sRCBV 值显示出很强的一致性(CCC = 0.99)。通过 ROC 分析,发现能准确区分 PTRE 和肿瘤复发的最佳 LFA 下阈值为 1.0(灵敏度:87.77%;特异度:90.22%),与地面实况相当。为识别侵袭性肿瘤区域,ROC 分析确定 LFA 上限阈值为 1.37(灵敏度:90.87%;特异度:91.10%),而 MFA 参考阈值为 1.56:对于基于 LFA 的 FTB 地图,1.0 和 1.37 的 sRCBV 阈值可以区分 PTRE 和复发性肿瘤。FTB图有助于制定手术计划、指导病理诊断和复发肿瘤的治疗策略。这项研究进一步证实了基于单剂量 LFA 的 DSC-MRI 的可靠性:缩写:LFA = 低翻转角;MFA = 中等翻转角;sRCBV = 标准相对脑血量;FTB = 肿瘤负荷分数;PTRE = 治疗后辐射效应;ROC = 接收者操作特征;CCC = 一致性相关系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantification of Infarct Core Volume in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Oxygen in CT Perfusion. Cerebrovascular Anomalies in the Fetus. Imaging Findings in Giant Cell Arteritis: Don't Turn a Blind Eye to the Obvious! An Extended Follow-up of Spinal Instrumentation Rescue with Cement Augmentation. Prevalence of Rathke Cleft and Other Incidental Pituitary Gland Findings on Contrast-Enhanced 3D Fat-Saturated T1 MPRAGE at 7T MRI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1