Prevalence of sacroiliac joint fusion in females and males depending on parity status

IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Journal of Biological Anthropology Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1002/ajpa.24951
Meredith Aulds
{"title":"Prevalence of sacroiliac joint fusion in females and males depending on parity status","authors":"Meredith Aulds","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.24951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Previous research shows that sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion is age and sex dependent. Older individuals—specifically starting in the fifth or sixth decade of life—are more likely to develop SI fusion. Females have a lower frequency of SI joint fusion than males, perhaps due to pregnancy or parturition. This study examines the relationship between SI joint fusion with both sex and parity status in females. The issue is whether the prevalence of SI fusion in nulliparous females is more similar to that of males or parous females.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The sample consists of 46 nulliparous females, 119 parous females, and 158 males from the William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection. Ages of the individuals ranged from 50 to 89 years. Sex, age, and parity status were self-reported.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The frequency of SI joint fusion is significantly different among males (13.29%), nulliparous females (6.52%), and parous females (0.84%). Pairwise comparison of the three groups for SI joint fusion shows that parous females and males are significantly different, but nulliparous females are nonsignificantly different from parous females and males.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Parity status does not appear to be a factor in the sexually dimorphic nature of SI joint fusion in this sample. Rather, biomechanical and hormonal factors may have a greater contribution to higher rates of SI joint fusion in males than females.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajpa.24951","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24951","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Previous research shows that sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion is age and sex dependent. Older individuals—specifically starting in the fifth or sixth decade of life—are more likely to develop SI fusion. Females have a lower frequency of SI joint fusion than males, perhaps due to pregnancy or parturition. This study examines the relationship between SI joint fusion with both sex and parity status in females. The issue is whether the prevalence of SI fusion in nulliparous females is more similar to that of males or parous females.

Materials and Methods

The sample consists of 46 nulliparous females, 119 parous females, and 158 males from the William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection. Ages of the individuals ranged from 50 to 89 years. Sex, age, and parity status were self-reported.

Results

The frequency of SI joint fusion is significantly different among males (13.29%), nulliparous females (6.52%), and parous females (0.84%). Pairwise comparison of the three groups for SI joint fusion shows that parous females and males are significantly different, but nulliparous females are nonsignificantly different from parous females and males.

Discussion

Parity status does not appear to be a factor in the sexually dimorphic nature of SI joint fusion in this sample. Rather, biomechanical and hormonal factors may have a greater contribution to higher rates of SI joint fusion in males than females.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骶髂关节融合术在女性和男性中的发病率取决于分娩情况。
目的:以往的研究表明,骶髂关节(SI)融合与年龄和性别有关。年龄较大的人,特别是在第五或第六个十年开始的人,更有可能发生骶髂关节融合。女性发生 SI 关节融合的频率低于男性,这可能与怀孕或分娩有关。本研究探讨了 SI 关节融合与女性的性别和产次之间的关系。问题在于,无产褥期女性的 SI 关节融合发生率是与男性更相似,还是与有产褥期的女性更相似:样本由威廉-巴斯(William M. Bass)捐赠的骸骨收藏中的 46 名无产期女性、119 名准产期女性和 158 名男性组成。这些人的年龄从 50 岁到 89 岁不等。性别、年龄和妊娠状况均为自我报告:结果:SI 关节融合的频率在男性(13.29%)、非妊娠女性(6.52%)和妊娠女性(0.84%)之间存在显著差异。对三个组别的 SI 关节融合情况进行配对比较后发现,奇数胎女性和男性之间存在显著差异,而非奇数胎女性与奇数胎女性和男性之间则无显著差异:讨论:在这一样本中,椎间关节融合术的性别二形性似乎并不是影响椎间关节融合术的因素。相反,生物力学和荷尔蒙因素可能是导致男性SI关节融合率高于女性的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The intersectional effects of sex and socioeconomic status on risk of mortality in industrializing England. Dying of pestilence: Stature and mortality from the Black Death in 14th-century Kyrgyzstan. Technical note: Does scan resolution or downsampling impact the analysis of trabecular bone architecture? Evolutionary selection and morphological integration in the hand of modern humans. "How Handy was early hominin 'know-how'?" An experimental approach exploring efficient early stone tool use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1