‘I only eat because I have to—to live’: The impacts of dysphagia on quality of life from the perspectives of people with dysphagia, supporters of people with dysphagia and allied health professionals

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1111/1460-6984.13044
Rebecca Smith, Lucy Bryant, Bronwyn Hemsley
{"title":"‘I only eat because I have to—to live’: The impacts of dysphagia on quality of life from the perspectives of people with dysphagia, supporters of people with dysphagia and allied health professionals","authors":"Rebecca Smith,&nbsp;Lucy Bryant,&nbsp;Bronwyn Hemsley","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.13044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A recent literature review identified that past research has described the impacts of dysphagia on quality of life; but there is limited research on these impacts from the perspective of people with dysphagia, their supporters and allied health professionals. Recent qualitative research has provided details about these perspectives, but researchers have also called for verification of these findings with a larger group of participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To expand upon the findings of the prior qualitative research on the views of people with dysphagia, supporters of people with dysphagia, and allied health professionals on the impacts of dysphagia and texture-modified food on quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods &amp; Procedures</h3>\n \n <p>An online survey of adults with dysphagia (<i>n</i> = 30), supporters of people with dysphagia (<i>n</i> = 4) and allied health professionals (<i>n</i> = 18) was conducted between November 2021 and February 2022. Categorical questions were analysed descriptively and open-ended questions were analysed for content categories of meaning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Outcomes &amp; Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants with dysphagia reported that dysphagia and texture-modified foods had a greater impact on their physical health than on their choice and control or social engagement. Supporters and allied health professionals viewed that dysphagia impacted the physical health and their choice and control of people with dysphagia. Across groups, participants considered that mealtime enjoyment, participation, and inclusion were influenced by the control the person had over their meals, the accessibility of the mealtime environment, and the attitudes of others.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions &amp; Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Dysphagia and its interventions negatively impact quality of life for people with dysphagia. People with dysphagia were the most affected by the physical impacts of dysphagia. Their perspectives contrasted with those of supporters and allied health professionals in some domains, highlighting the need for people with dysphagia to be included in research. Future research exploring how these perspectives are integrated into person-centred dysphagia management is warranted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What is already known on the subject</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Recent qualitative research has provided insights into the impacts of dysphagia on quality of life from the perspective of people with dysphagia, supporters of people with dysphagia, and allied health professionals. However, the small scale of these studies means that further research is needed with a larger group of people with dysphagia, supporters of people with dysphagia, and allied health professionals.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What this paper adds to existing knowledge</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>This paper verifies and extends upon the findings of prior qualitive research on the views of people with dysphagia, supporters of people with dysphagia, and allied health professionals on the impacts of dysphagia and its interventions on quality of life, participation, and inclusion.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>This research shows the importance of supporters of people with dysphagia and allied health professionals discussing mealtime quality of life with the person with dysphagia so that their perspectives are considered in the mealtime decision-making process. Furthermore, people with dysphagia should be able to specify strategies they want to trial to enhance their mealtime participation and inclusion.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.13044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.13044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A recent literature review identified that past research has described the impacts of dysphagia on quality of life; but there is limited research on these impacts from the perspective of people with dysphagia, their supporters and allied health professionals. Recent qualitative research has provided details about these perspectives, but researchers have also called for verification of these findings with a larger group of participants.

Aims

To expand upon the findings of the prior qualitative research on the views of people with dysphagia, supporters of people with dysphagia, and allied health professionals on the impacts of dysphagia and texture-modified food on quality of life.

Methods & Procedures

An online survey of adults with dysphagia (n = 30), supporters of people with dysphagia (n = 4) and allied health professionals (n = 18) was conducted between November 2021 and February 2022. Categorical questions were analysed descriptively and open-ended questions were analysed for content categories of meaning.

Outcomes & Results

Participants with dysphagia reported that dysphagia and texture-modified foods had a greater impact on their physical health than on their choice and control or social engagement. Supporters and allied health professionals viewed that dysphagia impacted the physical health and their choice and control of people with dysphagia. Across groups, participants considered that mealtime enjoyment, participation, and inclusion were influenced by the control the person had over their meals, the accessibility of the mealtime environment, and the attitudes of others.

Conclusions & Implications

Dysphagia and its interventions negatively impact quality of life for people with dysphagia. People with dysphagia were the most affected by the physical impacts of dysphagia. Their perspectives contrasted with those of supporters and allied health professionals in some domains, highlighting the need for people with dysphagia to be included in research. Future research exploring how these perspectives are integrated into person-centred dysphagia management is warranted.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject

  • Recent qualitative research has provided insights into the impacts of dysphagia on quality of life from the perspective of people with dysphagia, supporters of people with dysphagia, and allied health professionals. However, the small scale of these studies means that further research is needed with a larger group of people with dysphagia, supporters of people with dysphagia, and allied health professionals.

What this paper adds to existing knowledge

  • This paper verifies and extends upon the findings of prior qualitive research on the views of people with dysphagia, supporters of people with dysphagia, and allied health professionals on the impacts of dysphagia and its interventions on quality of life, participation, and inclusion.

What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?

  • This research shows the importance of supporters of people with dysphagia and allied health professionals discussing mealtime quality of life with the person with dysphagia so that their perspectives are considered in the mealtime decision-making process. Furthermore, people with dysphagia should be able to specify strategies they want to trial to enhance their mealtime participation and inclusion.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我进食只是为了生存":从吞咽困难患者、吞咽困难患者的支持者和专职医疗人员的角度看吞咽困难对生活质量的影响。
背景:最近的文献综述发现,过去的研究已经描述了吞咽困难对生活质量的影响;但从吞咽困难患者、其支持者和专职医疗人员的角度对这些影响的研究却很有限。最近的定性研究提供了有关这些观点的详细信息,但研究人员也呼吁在更大的参与者群体中对这些研究结果进行验证。目的:扩展先前的定性研究结果,了解吞咽困难患者、吞咽困难患者的支持者和专职医疗人员对吞咽困难和质地改良食物对生活质量的影响的看法:2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 2 月期间,对患有吞咽困难的成人(30 人)、吞咽困难患者的支持者(4 人)和专职医疗人员(18 人)进行了在线调查。对分类问题进行了描述性分析,对开放式问题进行了意义内容类别分析:有吞咽困难的参与者表示,吞咽困难和质地改良食品对其身体健康的影响大于对其选择权、控制权或社会参与的影响。支持者和专职医疗人员认为,吞咽困难影响了吞咽困难患者的身体健康及其选择和控制能力。在各个小组中,参与者都认为进餐时间的享受、参与和融入受到患者对进餐的控制、进餐环境的无障碍程度以及他人态度的影响:吞咽困难及其干预措施对吞咽困难患者的生活质量产生了负面影响。吞咽困难患者受吞咽困难对身体的影响最大。在某些领域,他们的观点与支持者和专职医疗人员的观点形成了鲜明对比,这凸显了将吞咽困难患者纳入研究的必要性。今后有必要开展研究,探讨如何将这些观点纳入以人为本的吞咽困难管理中:关于该主题的已有研究 最近的定性研究从吞咽困难患者、吞咽困难患者的支持者以及专职医疗人员的角度,深入探讨了吞咽困难对生活质量的影响。然而,由于这些研究的规模较小,因此需要对更多吞咽困难患者、吞咽困难患者的支持者以及专职医疗人员开展进一步研究。本文对现有知识的补充 本文验证并扩展了之前关于吞咽困难患者、吞咽困难患者的支持者以及专职医疗人员对吞咽困难及其干预措施对生活质量、参与和融入的影响的定性研究结果。这项工作有哪些潜在或实际的临床意义?这项研究表明,吞咽困难患者的支持者和专职医疗人员必须与吞咽困难患者讨论进餐时的生活质量,以便在进餐决策过程中考虑到他们的观点。此外,吞咽困难患者应该能够明确他们希望尝试的策略,以提高他们进餐时的参与度和融入度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Exploring vowel errors produced in nonword repetition in children with speech and language disorders. Animal-assisted services for adults with acquired neurogenic communication disorders: A scoping review. Gender and age biases in the assessment of speech accuracy: A study of speech-language clinicians' ratings of /s/ accuracy. Cultural adaptation and psychometric analysis of Communication Activities of Daily Living third edition in Spanish and Catalan for people with aphasia. Lexical retrieval difficulties in post-COVID-19 syndrome: Insights from verbal fluency and naming tasks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1