Examining factors and mechanisms of reading comprehension and reading fluency: Longitudinal evidence for Chinese children from grade 1 to grade 6

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102467
Ying Zhao , Xinchun Wu , Yahua Cheng
{"title":"Examining factors and mechanisms of reading comprehension and reading fluency: Longitudinal evidence for Chinese children from grade 1 to grade 6","authors":"Ying Zhao ,&nbsp;Xinchun Wu ,&nbsp;Yahua Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explored the early predictors of reading ability in Chinese children longitudinally and further examined whether shared or distinct mechanisms existed between reading comprehension and reading fluency. Metalinguistic awareness and rapid automatized naming (RAN) were administered in grade 1 (G1), word-level reading skills were administered in grade 4 (G4), and text-level reading abilities were administered in grade 6 (G6). After controlling for non-verbal intelligence and G1 working memory, the results showed that G1 morphological awareness had a significant effect on G6 reading comprehension, whereas G1 RAN predicted G6 reading fluency significantly. Furthermore, G4 vocabulary knowledge played a mediating role in the effect of G1 morphological awareness on G6 reading comprehension, while G1 RAN predicted G6 reading fluency via G4 word-reading fluency. These findings indicate the importance of early morphological awareness and RAN, and suggest the distinct rather than shared factors and mechanisms of reading comprehension and reading fluency.</p></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><p>This longitudinal study reveals the unique and long-lasting effect of early morphological awareness on reading comprehension five years later, as well as the unique contribution of early rapid automatized naming (RAN) on reading fluency. It also highlights the mediating roles of vocabulary knowledge and word-reading fluency in these two paths, respectively. These findings offer insights into the distinct rather than shared mechanisms of reading comprehension and reading fluency. Providing explicit and systematic instruction on morphological awareness and RAN in early periods of elementary school may have cascading effects, initially enhancing word-level reading skills and subsequently facilitating text-level reading abilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000608","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the early predictors of reading ability in Chinese children longitudinally and further examined whether shared or distinct mechanisms existed between reading comprehension and reading fluency. Metalinguistic awareness and rapid automatized naming (RAN) were administered in grade 1 (G1), word-level reading skills were administered in grade 4 (G4), and text-level reading abilities were administered in grade 6 (G6). After controlling for non-verbal intelligence and G1 working memory, the results showed that G1 morphological awareness had a significant effect on G6 reading comprehension, whereas G1 RAN predicted G6 reading fluency significantly. Furthermore, G4 vocabulary knowledge played a mediating role in the effect of G1 morphological awareness on G6 reading comprehension, while G1 RAN predicted G6 reading fluency via G4 word-reading fluency. These findings indicate the importance of early morphological awareness and RAN, and suggest the distinct rather than shared factors and mechanisms of reading comprehension and reading fluency.

Educational relevance and implications statement

This longitudinal study reveals the unique and long-lasting effect of early morphological awareness on reading comprehension five years later, as well as the unique contribution of early rapid automatized naming (RAN) on reading fluency. It also highlights the mediating roles of vocabulary knowledge and word-reading fluency in these two paths, respectively. These findings offer insights into the distinct rather than shared mechanisms of reading comprehension and reading fluency. Providing explicit and systematic instruction on morphological awareness and RAN in early periods of elementary school may have cascading effects, initially enhancing word-level reading skills and subsequently facilitating text-level reading abilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究阅读理解和阅读流畅性的因素和机制:中国儿童从一年级到六年级的纵向证据
本研究对中国儿童阅读能力的早期预测因素进行了纵向探索,并进一步研究了阅读理解和阅读流畅性之间是否存在共同或不同的机制。研究在一年级(G1)进行了金属语言意识和快速自动命名(RAN)测试,在四年级(G4)进行了单词级阅读能力测试,在六年级(G6)进行了文本级阅读能力测试。在控制了非语言智力和 G1 工作记忆之后,结果显示 G1 的形态认知对 G6 的阅读理解能力有显著影响,而 G1 的 RAN 对 G6 的阅读流畅性有显著预测作用。此外,G4词汇知识对G1形态认知对G6阅读理解的影响起到了中介作用,而G1 RAN则通过G4单词阅读流利性预测了G6阅读流利性。这项纵向研究揭示了早期形态认知对五年后阅读理解的独特而持久的影响,以及早期快速自动命名(RAN)对阅读流利性的独特贡献。研究还强调了词汇知识和单词阅读流利性分别在这两种途径中的中介作用。这些研究结果为阅读理解和阅读流利性的不同而非共享机制提供了启示。在小学低年级阶段提供明确而系统的形态认知和阅读流利性教学可能会产生连带效应,首先提高单词层面的阅读能力,然后促进文本层面的阅读能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
The structure of adult thinking: A network approach to (meta)cognitive processing Ink and pixels: Impact of highlighting and reading self-efficacy on adolescents' cognitive load, epistemic emotions, and text comprehension Students' study activities before and after exam deadlines as predictors of performance in STEM courses: A multi-source data analysis The relationship between positive and painful emotions and cognitive load during an algebra learning task Idiographic learning analytics: Mapping of the ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1