{"title":"Diet in China during substantial economic growth: Quality, inequality, trends, and determinants","authors":"Siqi Gao , Joel Cuffey , Gucheng Li , Wenying Li","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates inequality in diets in China during its economic growth using data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1997–2011). Overall, diet quality was significantly improved over the 14 years, as indicated by the increasing mean of Chinese Healthy Eating Index (CHEI) scores from 40.76 in 1997 to 54.52 in 2011. Initially, dietary improvement favored affluent populations, leading to widening inequality, but it became more equitable in later years. Socioeconomic factors are critical determinants of inequality in diets, with urban-rural disparity being a significant barrier to equalizing diet quality. The results of the Oaxaca decomposition indicate that changes in inequality in diets are primarily driven by the extent to which nutritional choices respond to income fluctuations rather than the actual change in income itself. While women exhibited lower inequality in diets quality compared to men, they were more likely to be situated at a relatively lower level of diet quality. Furthermore, differences in health insurance coverage also play a significant role in the changes observed in inequality in diets. This study highlights the importance of considering income elasticity and its influence on dietary behaviors when examining the dynamics of income-based inequality in diets. Non-dietary factors, including basic health insurance and rural development initiatives, are essential in addressing the developing challenge of inequality in diets during economic growth phases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 102208"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X2400097X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates inequality in diets in China during its economic growth using data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1997–2011). Overall, diet quality was significantly improved over the 14 years, as indicated by the increasing mean of Chinese Healthy Eating Index (CHEI) scores from 40.76 in 1997 to 54.52 in 2011. Initially, dietary improvement favored affluent populations, leading to widening inequality, but it became more equitable in later years. Socioeconomic factors are critical determinants of inequality in diets, with urban-rural disparity being a significant barrier to equalizing diet quality. The results of the Oaxaca decomposition indicate that changes in inequality in diets are primarily driven by the extent to which nutritional choices respond to income fluctuations rather than the actual change in income itself. While women exhibited lower inequality in diets quality compared to men, they were more likely to be situated at a relatively lower level of diet quality. Furthermore, differences in health insurance coverage also play a significant role in the changes observed in inequality in diets. This study highlights the importance of considering income elasticity and its influence on dietary behaviors when examining the dynamics of income-based inequality in diets. Non-dietary factors, including basic health insurance and rural development initiatives, are essential in addressing the developing challenge of inequality in diets during economic growth phases.
期刊介绍:
The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.