Alex Hoyt PhD, RN , Jason Lucey DNP, FNP-BC , Susan Kelly-Weeder PhD, FNP-BC, FAANP, FAAN , Monica O'Reilly-Jacob PhD, APRN, FNP-BC, FAAN
{"title":"Nurse practitioners’ degrees and associations with time use, functional autonomy, and job outcomes","authors":"Alex Hoyt PhD, RN , Jason Lucey DNP, FNP-BC , Susan Kelly-Weeder PhD, FNP-BC, FAANP, FAAN , Monica O'Reilly-Jacob PhD, APRN, FNP-BC, FAAN","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Doctorate of Nursing Practice preparation is recommended for entry to nurse practitioner (NP) practice but there are few comparative studies, and their designs conflate educational pathways.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate time use, functional autonomy, and job outcomes among NPs without a doctorate, NPs whose initial NP preparation and doctorate were separated by 2 or more years, and NPs whose NP preparation and doctorate were concurrent.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We selected all NPs from the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses, except those whose doctorates focused on research. We controlled for confounding and applied sample weights to produce nationally representative results.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>NPs' educational pathways are associated with distinct practice roles and, moving forward, policy should be informed by evidence that accounts for their differences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Concurrent NPs had higher levels of functional autonomy compared with NPs without a doctorate, but patterns of time use were essentially the same. Separate doctoral education was associated with teaching and administration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":"72 4","pages":"Article 102193"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424000861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Doctorate of Nursing Practice preparation is recommended for entry to nurse practitioner (NP) practice but there are few comparative studies, and their designs conflate educational pathways.
Purpose
To investigate time use, functional autonomy, and job outcomes among NPs without a doctorate, NPs whose initial NP preparation and doctorate were separated by 2 or more years, and NPs whose NP preparation and doctorate were concurrent.
Method
We selected all NPs from the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses, except those whose doctorates focused on research. We controlled for confounding and applied sample weights to produce nationally representative results.
Discussion
NPs' educational pathways are associated with distinct practice roles and, moving forward, policy should be informed by evidence that accounts for their differences.
Conclusion
Concurrent NPs had higher levels of functional autonomy compared with NPs without a doctorate, but patterns of time use were essentially the same. Separate doctoral education was associated with teaching and administration.
背景护理实践博士准备被推荐用于执业护士(NP),但比较研究很少,而且其设计混淆了教育途径.Purpose To investigate time use, functional autonomy, and job outcomes among NPs without a doctorate, NPs whose initial NP preparation and doctorate were apart by 2 or more years, and NPs whose NP preparation and doctorate were concurrent.MethodWe selected all NPs from the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses, except those whose doctorates focused on research.我们对混杂因素进行了控制,并应用样本加权得出了具有全国代表性的结果。讨论护士的教育途径与不同的实践角色相关联,因此,在制定政策时应参考能说明其差异的证据。结论与未获得博士学位的护士相比,同时获得博士学位的护士具有更高水平的职能自主权,但时间使用模式基本相同。单独的博士教育与教学和管理有关。
期刊介绍:
Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.