A comparison of the transabdominal and transvaginal methods of ultrasound-guided aspiration of pre-ovulatory oocytes for in vitro fertilisation.

Clinical reproduction and fertility Pub Date : 1987-12-01
K R Mao, P P Tam, E P Loong, H C Lee, Y F Wong, T Chiu
{"title":"A comparison of the transabdominal and transvaginal methods of ultrasound-guided aspiration of pre-ovulatory oocytes for in vitro fertilisation.","authors":"K R Mao,&nbsp;P P Tam,&nbsp;E P Loong,&nbsp;H C Lee,&nbsp;Y F Wong,&nbsp;T Chiu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficiency of two methods of ultrasound-guided aspiration of pre-ovulatory oocytes was compared in 238 treatment cycles, of which 166 were by the transabdominal-transvesical (TA) route and 72 by the transvaginal (TV) route. Successful collection of at least one oocyte was achieved in 86% of TA attempts and in 97% of TV attempts. Significantly less oocytes were collected from follicles by the TA methods than by the TV methods: 374 oocytes were obtained from 797 follicles (46% recovery) and 242 oocytes from 338 follicles (72% recovery), respectively. Although fertilisation occurred more frequently in TA-recovered oocyte (70% versus 54%), the incidence of cleavage per inseminated oocytes collected by these TA and TV methods was similar (49% versus 44%, respectively). Results of this study therefore suggest that the TV method is superior to the TA approach for oocyte recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10478,"journal":{"name":"Clinical reproduction and fertility","volume":"5 6","pages":"373-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical reproduction and fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficiency of two methods of ultrasound-guided aspiration of pre-ovulatory oocytes was compared in 238 treatment cycles, of which 166 were by the transabdominal-transvesical (TA) route and 72 by the transvaginal (TV) route. Successful collection of at least one oocyte was achieved in 86% of TA attempts and in 97% of TV attempts. Significantly less oocytes were collected from follicles by the TA methods than by the TV methods: 374 oocytes were obtained from 797 follicles (46% recovery) and 242 oocytes from 338 follicles (72% recovery), respectively. Although fertilisation occurred more frequently in TA-recovered oocyte (70% versus 54%), the incidence of cleavage per inseminated oocytes collected by these TA and TV methods was similar (49% versus 44%, respectively). Results of this study therefore suggest that the TV method is superior to the TA approach for oocyte recovery.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下经腹和经阴道抽吸排卵前卵母细胞进行体外受精的比较。
比较两种超声引导下排卵前卵母细胞抽吸方法238个治疗周期的效果,其中经腹经膀胱(TA)途径166个,经阴道(TV)途径72个。86%的TA尝试和97%的TV尝试成功收集了至少一个卵母细胞。与TV法相比,TA法从卵泡中收集的卵母细胞明显减少:分别从797个卵泡中获得374个卵母细胞(回收率46%)和338个卵泡中获得242个卵母细胞(回收率72%)。虽然TA回收的卵母细胞的受精频率更高(70%对54%),但TA和TV方法收集的受精卵的卵裂发生率相似(分别为49%对44%)。因此,本研究结果表明,TV方法优于TA方法用于卵母细胞恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Launch of New Journal - An Announcement A comparison of the transabdominal and transvaginal methods of ultrasound-guided aspiration of pre-ovulatory oocytes for in vitro fertilisation. Luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome. Oral contraceptive-induced changes in plasma lipids: do they have any clinical relevance? Sperm auto-immunity associated with vasectomy, vasovasostomy and epididymovasostomy in Korean males.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1