Influence of Ti-Base-Supported Implant Restoration on Peri- implant Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Han-Pang Liu, Sieu Yien Chiam, Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"Influence of Ti-Base-Supported Implant Restoration on Peri- implant Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Han-Pang Liu, Sieu Yien Chiam, Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the impact of titanium (Ti) base-supported single-implant restorations on peri-implant conditions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 274 implants met the inclusion criteria and were chosen for data analysis. A random-effects model was employed for the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from this study revealed that the Ti-basegroup exhibited a small but statistically significant increase in peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL; mean difference = 0.088 mm; 95% CI = 0.003 to 0.17; P = .041) compared to the one-piece abutment group. These effects were consistent in the subgroup analysis of regularly threaded implants compared to the microthreaded subgroup. No significant differences were observed between the Ti-base group and the abutment group concerning probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), and the risk of prosthetic-related complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of a Ti-base in a single implant-supported restorationis associated with a slight increase in peri-implant MBL, while other peri-implant health parameters show no significant correlation. Therefore, the evidence of the impact that Ti-bases have on the peri-implant conditions of single implant-supported restorations is insufficient based on the findings of the present meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"815-822"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the impact of titanium (Ti) base-supported single-implant restorations on peri-implant conditions.

Materials and methods: Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 274 implants met the inclusion criteria and were chosen for data analysis. A random-effects model was employed for the meta-analysis.

Results: Data from this study revealed that the Ti-basegroup exhibited a small but statistically significant increase in peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL; mean difference = 0.088 mm; 95% CI = 0.003 to 0.17; P = .041) compared to the one-piece abutment group. These effects were consistent in the subgroup analysis of regularly threaded implants compared to the microthreaded subgroup. No significant differences were observed between the Ti-base group and the abutment group concerning probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), and the risk of prosthetic-related complications.

Conclusions: The use of a Ti-base in a single implant-supported restorationis associated with a slight increase in peri-implant MBL, while other peri-implant health parameters show no significant correlation. Therefore, the evidence of the impact that Ti-bases have on the peri-implant conditions of single implant-supported restorations is insufficient based on the findings of the present meta-analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钛基托种植体修复对种植体周围条件的影响:系统回顾与元分析
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究钛基底支持的单颗种植体修复体对种植体周围条件的影响:我们选择了六项随机对照试验(RCT)进行数据分析,共有 274 个种植体符合纳入标准。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型:研究数据显示,与一体式基台组相比,钛基台组的种植体周围边缘骨质流失略有增加,但具有统计学意义(平均值差异 = 0.088,95% 置信区间 = 0.003 到 0.17,P = 0.041)。在常规螺纹种植体与微螺纹种植体的亚组分析中,这些影响是一致的。然而,在探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血量(BOP)和修复体相关并发症的风险方面,钛基底组与基台组之间没有观察到明显的差异:结论:在单种植体支持修复中使用钛基底与种植体周围边缘骨丧失的轻微增加有关,而其他种植体周围健康参数则没有明显的相关性。因此,根据这项荟萃分析的结果来确定钛基底对单种植体支持修复体种植体周围条件的影响是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration: L-PRF Bone-Block Vs A Mixture of Autogenous Bone with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral. A Split-Mouth RCT Study with 25 Months Follow-Up. Influence of Dental Implant Diameters on Prosthesis Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Qualitative Analysis of Implant-Bone Interface After Implant Placement Implementing Condensation Technique In Vitro. Thermal Changes During Digital Guided Implant Surgery Using the Conventional and Single Drill Protocols. Effect of Primary Stability on Short vs. Conventional -Implants with Reverse Concave Neck.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1