{"title":"An In Vitro Study of Torque Application in Abutment Screw Tightening at the Implant-Abutment Junction in Simulated Osseointegrated Implants.","authors":"Jan C Kwan","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate initial torque values (ITVs) and removal torque values (RTVs) in abutment screw tightening and their impact on torque application at the implant-abutment junction (IAJ) using a biomechanical friction resistance model simulating various bone densities, with and without counter-torquing measures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 60 implant-abutment assemblies were divided into three groups that each simulated different levels of frictional resistance as follows: (1) low: < 30 Ncm; (2) medium: 30 to 40 Ncm; and (3) high: > 40 Ncm. The endpoint for abutment screw tightening was either reaching a preset torque value of 35 Ncm or detecting a change in the implant's angular position. ITV, RTV, and changes in angular position were recorded. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey tests were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all frictional resistance groups, abutment screws tightened with a counter-torquing device attained 35 Ncm (P > .05). Abutment screws tightened without a counter-torquing device in low and medium frictional resistance groups were unable to attain 35 Ncm prior to implant rotation. ITVs of abutment screws without counter-torque were not significantly different in the medium and high frictional resistance groups (P > .05) but were significantly different in the low frictional resistance group (P < .001). No significant difference was found for the change in implant angular displacement for all groups (P > .05), regardless of counter-torquing measures; however, a high variance was observed in the low and medium frictional resistance groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under the experimental conditions, counter-torque is important to ensure that the desired torque value is applied to the implant-abutment connection in low frictional resistance. RTV is proportionally related to ITV and can be used to estimate the ITV at the IAJ.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"171-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate initial torque values (ITVs) and removal torque values (RTVs) in abutment screw tightening and their impact on torque application at the implant-abutment junction (IAJ) using a biomechanical friction resistance model simulating various bone densities, with and without counter-torquing measures.
Materials and methods: A total of 60 implant-abutment assemblies were divided into three groups that each simulated different levels of frictional resistance as follows: (1) low: < 30 Ncm; (2) medium: 30 to 40 Ncm; and (3) high: > 40 Ncm. The endpoint for abutment screw tightening was either reaching a preset torque value of 35 Ncm or detecting a change in the implant's angular position. ITV, RTV, and changes in angular position were recorded. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey tests were used.
Results: For all frictional resistance groups, abutment screws tightened with a counter-torquing device attained 35 Ncm (P > .05). Abutment screws tightened without a counter-torquing device in low and medium frictional resistance groups were unable to attain 35 Ncm prior to implant rotation. ITVs of abutment screws without counter-torque were not significantly different in the medium and high frictional resistance groups (P > .05) but were significantly different in the low frictional resistance group (P < .001). No significant difference was found for the change in implant angular displacement for all groups (P > .05), regardless of counter-torquing measures; however, a high variance was observed in the low and medium frictional resistance groups.
Conclusions: Under the experimental conditions, counter-torque is important to ensure that the desired torque value is applied to the implant-abutment connection in low frictional resistance. RTV is proportionally related to ITV and can be used to estimate the ITV at the IAJ.