From frontier-making to world-making: The enduring power of frontiers in South Asia

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Political Geography Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103133
Nivi Manchanda , Oliver Turner
{"title":"From frontier-making to world-making: The enduring power of frontiers in South Asia","authors":"Nivi Manchanda ,&nbsp;Oliver Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article examines the social and geopolitical power of frontiers. For some, frontiers are viewed relatively narrowly as markers of physical territory, and as relics of a past imperial age. We build on ‘critical’ or ‘revisionist’ frontier study which sees frontiers as persistent and regenerative forces of social practice that give meaning to the landscape and its inhabitants. With a focus on South Asia, and India's Northeast in particular, we show that while frontiers may appear to have disappeared they can be remade in the interests of modern hegemonic power and neo-colonising policies, sometimes within the territorial borders of nation states but between imagined worlds of civilisation and barbarism which the frontiers themselves help to define and create. This can be achieved through an ‘imperial sleight of hand’, whereby frontiers of history can be co-opted and refashioned including by post-colonial states and institutions in the service of contemporary political practice. Thus, frontiers commonly represent (manufactured) opportunities for the consolidation or advancement of power, more than challenges to be resolved or overcome. In line with the focus of this special issue, we argue that this gives frontiers the contemporary world-making capacity to permit and foreclose particular lives and subjectivities, and that racialising frontier logics play out even within the so-called ‘non-white’ or majority world.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 103133"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824000829/pdfft?md5=6c57219bc46309fbaf59730350ff180d&pid=1-s2.0-S0962629824000829-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824000829","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the social and geopolitical power of frontiers. For some, frontiers are viewed relatively narrowly as markers of physical territory, and as relics of a past imperial age. We build on ‘critical’ or ‘revisionist’ frontier study which sees frontiers as persistent and regenerative forces of social practice that give meaning to the landscape and its inhabitants. With a focus on South Asia, and India's Northeast in particular, we show that while frontiers may appear to have disappeared they can be remade in the interests of modern hegemonic power and neo-colonising policies, sometimes within the territorial borders of nation states but between imagined worlds of civilisation and barbarism which the frontiers themselves help to define and create. This can be achieved through an ‘imperial sleight of hand’, whereby frontiers of history can be co-opted and refashioned including by post-colonial states and institutions in the service of contemporary political practice. Thus, frontiers commonly represent (manufactured) opportunities for the consolidation or advancement of power, more than challenges to be resolved or overcome. In line with the focus of this special issue, we argue that this gives frontiers the contemporary world-making capacity to permit and foreclose particular lives and subjectivities, and that racialising frontier logics play out even within the so-called ‘non-white’ or majority world.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从创造边疆到创造世界:南亚边疆的持久力量
本文探讨了边疆的社会和地缘政治力量。在一些人看来,疆界被相对狭隘地视为实际领土的标志和过去帝国时代的遗迹。我们以 "批判的 "或 "修正的 "边疆研究为基础,将边疆视为社会实践的持久和再生力量,赋予地貌及其居民以意义。以南亚,尤其是印度东北部为重点,我们表明,虽然疆界看似已经消失,但为了现代霸权和新殖民政策的利益,疆界可以被重塑,有时是在民族国家的领土边界内,有时是在想象中的文明与野蛮世界之间,而疆界本身有助于定义和创造这些世界。这可以通过一种 "帝国诡计 "来实现,即历史疆界可以被后殖民国家和机构共同利用和重新塑造,以服务于当代政治实践。因此,疆域通常代表着(制造的)巩固或推进权力的机会,而不是需要解决或克服的挑战。与本期特刊的重点一致,我们认为这赋予了疆域以当代世界制造的能力,允许和禁止特定的生活和主体性,种族化的疆域逻辑甚至在所谓的 "非白人 "或多数世界中也在发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Fragmenting forest governance: Land tenure and the REDD+ paradox in Kigoma pilot project, Tanzania Assembling governance in São Paulo's "Cracolândia" Negotiating (under)development? Expanding bargaining power within globalised production networks “There, seated upon the toilet, apparently in the midst of defecation, was the president of the United States”: Toilets and elite politics in the USA and UK Making sense of clandestine graves: Material epistemology and the political geography of uncertain knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1