Association Between Hypnotics and Dementia: A Mini Narrative Review

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.30773/pi.2023.0383
Sung-Hoon Yoon, Young-Chan Kim, H. Seo, Seung Chul Hong, Tae Won Kim, Jong-Hyun Jeong, Y. Um
{"title":"Association Between Hypnotics and Dementia:\nA Mini Narrative Review","authors":"Sung-Hoon Yoon, Young-Chan Kim, H. Seo, Seung Chul Hong, Tae Won Kim, Jong-Hyun Jeong, Y. Um","doi":"10.30773/pi.2023.0383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the existing literature on the relationship between hypnotics and dementia, considering both potential link and inconclusive or lack of association.Methods Data from studies that investigate the association between hypnotic medications and dementia were reviewed. Studies included both cohort studies and systematic reviews, participants with various type of dementia and hypnotics including benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs (ZDs).Results The existing literatures presents conflicting evidence regarding the association between hypnotics, including BZDs and ZDs, and the risk of dementia. Some studies suggest a potential link between prolonged use of hypnotics and an increased risk of dementia. However, other studies indicate inconclusive or lacking evidence regarding this association. Factors such as study design, sample characteristics, and control of confounding variables contribute to the variability in findings.Conclusion The relationship between hypnotics and dementia remains complex and controversial. While some studies suggest a potential association, others find inconclusive or conflicting evidence. Future research should focus on addressing methodological limitations, considering classifying dementia subtypes, and try to adjust medication lag time.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"22 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2023.0383","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the existing literature on the relationship between hypnotics and dementia, considering both potential link and inconclusive or lack of association.Methods Data from studies that investigate the association between hypnotic medications and dementia were reviewed. Studies included both cohort studies and systematic reviews, participants with various type of dementia and hypnotics including benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs (ZDs).Results The existing literatures presents conflicting evidence regarding the association between hypnotics, including BZDs and ZDs, and the risk of dementia. Some studies suggest a potential link between prolonged use of hypnotics and an increased risk of dementia. However, other studies indicate inconclusive or lacking evidence regarding this association. Factors such as study design, sample characteristics, and control of confounding variables contribute to the variability in findings.Conclusion The relationship between hypnotics and dementia remains complex and controversial. While some studies suggest a potential association, others find inconclusive or conflicting evidence. Future research should focus on addressing methodological limitations, considering classifying dementia subtypes, and try to adjust medication lag time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催眠药与痴呆症的关系:微型叙事回顾
目的 本叙述性综述旨在对催眠药与痴呆症之间关系的现有文献进行全面评估,既考虑潜在联系,也考虑不确定或缺乏联系。研究包括队列研究和系统综述,参与者患有不同类型的痴呆症,使用的催眠药包括苯二氮卓类药物(BZDs)和Z类药物(ZDs)。结果 关于催眠药(包括BZDs和ZDs)与痴呆症风险之间的关系,现有文献提供了相互矛盾的证据。一些研究表明,长期使用催眠药与痴呆症风险增加之间存在潜在联系。然而,其他研究则表明这种关联并不确定或缺乏证据。研究设计、样本特征和混杂变量控制等因素导致了研究结果的差异。一些研究表明两者之间存在潜在联系,而另一些研究则发现了不确定或相互矛盾的证据。未来的研究应重点解决方法学上的局限性,考虑对痴呆症亚型进行分类,并尝试调整用药滞后时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Do All Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhages Need to Be Transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center?" Chemical Editing of Proteins: From a Specific Residue to Functional Domains. Asymmetric Alkyne Transformation via Gold/Organo Synergistic Catalysis. Function Decoupling and Modular Platform: Emerging Design Principles for MOF Luminescent Sensing. Computation-Driven Experimental Discovery of Reactivity Space of Organoboron Compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1