Prediction of Poor Outcome Using the Urea to Albumin Ratio in Thoracic Empyema

Q3 Medicine Acta Medica Lituanica Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.15388/amed.2024.31.1.21
E. Dimitrov, Daniel Valchev, G. Minkov, Emil Enchev, Y. Yovtchev
{"title":"Prediction of Poor Outcome Using the Urea to Albumin Ratio in Thoracic Empyema","authors":"E. Dimitrov, Daniel Valchev, G. Minkov, Emil Enchev, Y. Yovtchev","doi":"10.15388/amed.2024.31.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The prognostic performance of urea-to-albumin ratio (UAR) has been assessed in various pulmonary and nonpulmonary conditions, but never in thoracic empyema. Therefore, our aim was to determine whether this marker has the ability to predict outcome in such patients.Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted in a Clinic of Thoracic Surgery at a University Hospital between January 2021 and October 2023. A total of 84 patients who underwent emergency surgery due to thoracic empyema were involved. Serum levels of urea and albumin at admission were used to calculate UAR. We analyzed area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curves of UAR, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and quick-sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), and compared their prognostic performance.Results: The identified in-hospital mortality was 10.7%. The UAR showed the best ability to prognosticate mortality compared to qSOFA (AUROC = 0.828 vs 0.747) and SIRS (AUROC = 0.828 vs 0.676). We established a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 74.2% at optimal cut-off value UAR > 51.1 for prediction of adverse outcome.Conclusion: In patients with thoracic empyema urea-to-albumin ratio showed significant prognostic performance and a potential for clinical application as a low cost and widely available predictor of death.","PeriodicalId":34365,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Lituanica","volume":"21 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Lituanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/amed.2024.31.1.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The prognostic performance of urea-to-albumin ratio (UAR) has been assessed in various pulmonary and nonpulmonary conditions, but never in thoracic empyema. Therefore, our aim was to determine whether this marker has the ability to predict outcome in such patients.Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted in a Clinic of Thoracic Surgery at a University Hospital between January 2021 and October 2023. A total of 84 patients who underwent emergency surgery due to thoracic empyema were involved. Serum levels of urea and albumin at admission were used to calculate UAR. We analyzed area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curves of UAR, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and quick-sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), and compared their prognostic performance.Results: The identified in-hospital mortality was 10.7%. The UAR showed the best ability to prognosticate mortality compared to qSOFA (AUROC = 0.828 vs 0.747) and SIRS (AUROC = 0.828 vs 0.676). We established a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 74.2% at optimal cut-off value UAR > 51.1 for prediction of adverse outcome.Conclusion: In patients with thoracic empyema urea-to-albumin ratio showed significant prognostic performance and a potential for clinical application as a low cost and widely available predictor of death.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用胸腔积液中尿素与白蛋白的比率预测不良预后
目的:尿素白蛋白比值(UAR)的预后性能已在各种肺部和非肺部疾病中进行过评估,但从未在胸腔积液中进行过评估。因此,我们的目的是确定该指标是否能预测此类患者的预后:方法:2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月期间,我们在一所大学医院的胸外科门诊进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。共有 84 名患者因胸腔积液接受了急诊手术。入院时的血清尿素和白蛋白水平用于计算 UAR。我们分析了UAR、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和快速序列器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)的接收者操作特征曲线下面积,并比较了它们的预后表现:结果:确定的院内死亡率为10.7%。与qSOFA(AUROC = 0.828 vs 0.747)和SIRS(AUROC = 0.828 vs 0.676)相比,UAR显示出最好的预后死亡率能力。在预测不良预后的最佳临界值 UAR > 51.1 时,我们确定了 87.5% 的灵敏度和 74.2% 的特异性:结论:在胸腔积液患者中,尿素-白蛋白比值显示出显著的预后性能,并有可能作为一种低成本、可广泛应用的死亡预测指标应用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Medica Lituanica
Acta Medica Lituanica Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Successful Endovascular Management of Recurrent Hemoptysis due to Multiple Rasmussen Aneurysms in a Case of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Rare Case Scenario Knee Extensor Apparatus Reconstruction with Allograft after Patellar Resection: A Case Report Accidental Intravenous Administration of Simethicone in a 4-Year-Old Patient: A Case Report Evaluation of Blood Culture Results in Patients with Malignancy in Erzurum Province, Turkey Prediction of Poor Outcome Using the Urea to Albumin Ratio in Thoracic Empyema
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1