Analysis of Liability and Legal Protection of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) Review of Court Decision No. 43/Pdt.G/2017/PN. Slt

Fajar Fitrio Dwi Nugroho
{"title":"Analysis of Liability and Legal Protection of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) Review of Court Decision No. 43/Pdt.G/2017/PN. Slt","authors":"Fajar Fitrio Dwi Nugroho","doi":"10.59698/quru.v2i2.189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to explore the legal protections and responsibilities assumed by Land Deed Officials (PPATs), particularly in the context of Court Decision No. 43/Pdt.G/2017/PN. Slt. Using a case study approach, we identify factors that affect the legal responsibilities of PPATs under the judgment. While evaluating whether the existing legal system has provided adequate protection to them. This research uses a juridical sociological approach method with a descriptive analytical nature, as well as primary data collection techniques through interviews and secondary data through an inventory of books, documents, and articles. The results of the analysis show that Court Decision No. 43/Pdt.G/2017/PN. Slt provides an important insight into the responsibility of PPAT in making land deeds. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of improving a more effective legal system to ensure adequate protection for PPATs and the public interest in property transactions. The results show that PPATs must be responsible for the validity of the deeds they make in accordance with the rules and principles, and they are responsible for attending the trial. However, based on the precautionary principle, PPATs need to increase caution in making land payment settlement notes. In relation to the legal protection of PPATs, they are entitled to both mental and physical protection from interference and threats from any party.","PeriodicalId":517990,"journal":{"name":"QURU’: Journal of Family Law and Culture","volume":"2 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QURU’: Journal of Family Law and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59698/quru.v2i2.189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to explore the legal protections and responsibilities assumed by Land Deed Officials (PPATs), particularly in the context of Court Decision No. 43/Pdt.G/2017/PN. Slt. Using a case study approach, we identify factors that affect the legal responsibilities of PPATs under the judgment. While evaluating whether the existing legal system has provided adequate protection to them. This research uses a juridical sociological approach method with a descriptive analytical nature, as well as primary data collection techniques through interviews and secondary data through an inventory of books, documents, and articles. The results of the analysis show that Court Decision No. 43/Pdt.G/2017/PN. Slt provides an important insight into the responsibility of PPAT in making land deeds. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of improving a more effective legal system to ensure adequate protection for PPATs and the public interest in property transactions. The results show that PPATs must be responsible for the validity of the deeds they make in accordance with the rules and principles, and they are responsible for attending the trial. However, based on the precautionary principle, PPATs need to increase caution in making land payment settlement notes. In relation to the legal protection of PPATs, they are entitled to both mental and physical protection from interference and threats from any party.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第 43/Pdt.G/2017/PN 号法院判决的审查:土地契约官员(PPAT)的责任分析和法律保护第43/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Slt号法院裁决
本研究旨在探讨土地契约官员(PPAT)所承担的法律保护和责任,特别是在第 43/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Slt.我们采用案例研究的方法,确定了影响判决书规定的PPAT法律责任的因素。同时评估现有法律体系是否为他们提供了足够的保护。本研究采用了具有描述分析性质的法社会学方法,以及通过访谈收集第一手数据和通过书籍、文件和文章清单收集第二手数据的技术。分析结果表明,第 43/Pdt.G/2017/PN.第 43/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Slt 号法院判决对 PPAT 在制定地契方面的责任提供了重要启示。在改进更有效的法律制度以确保在财产交易中充分保护PPAT和公众利益的背景下,讨论了这些发现的影响。研究结果表明,PPAT 必须按照规定和原则对其所立契约的有效性负责,并有责任出席审判。然而,基于预防原则,PPAT 在制作土地付款结算票据时需要更加谨慎。在法律保护方面,PPAT 有权获得精神和人身保护,免受任何一方的干扰和威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Positive Law on the Origin of Children from Fasid Marriage: Case Study of Stipulation No. 040/Pdt.P/2017/Pa.Sal in Salatiga Religious Court Itsbat Marriage of Sirri Polygamy in Progressive Law Perspective, Case Study of Decision Number 5065/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Clp Analysis of Liability and Legal Protection of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) Review of Court Decision No. 43/Pdt.G/2017/PN. Slt Comparison of Customary Law and Islamic Law on the Tradition of Donation in Walimatul 'Urs: in Padukuhan Nepi, Kranggan Village, Galur Sub-district, Kulon Progo Regency Wife's Right to Property After Divorce: An Examination of Islamic Law and Legislation in Religious Court Decisions in Yogyakarta City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1