Implementation of guidelines on Family Involvement for persons with Psychotic disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. Effect on relatives’ outcomes and family interventions received

Irene Norheim, Reidar Pedersen, Maria Lie Selle, Jan Ivar Røssberg, Lars Hestmark, Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang, Torleif Ruud, Vilde Maria Åsholt, Kristiane Myckland Hansson, Paul Møller, Roar Fosse, Maria Romøren
{"title":"Implementation of guidelines on Family Involvement for persons with Psychotic disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. Effect on relatives’ outcomes and family interventions received","authors":"Irene Norheim, Reidar Pedersen, Maria Lie Selle, Jan Ivar Røssberg, Lars Hestmark, Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang, Torleif Ruud, Vilde Maria Åsholt, Kristiane Myckland Hansson, Paul Møller, Roar Fosse, Maria Romøren","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1381007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Family interventions (FI) are recommended as part of the treatment for psychotic disorders, but the implementation in mental health services is generally poor. Recently, The Implementation of guidelines on Family Involvement for persons with Psychotic disorders (IFIP) trial, demonstrated significant improvements in implementation outcomes at cluster-level. This sub-study aims to examine the effectiveness of the IFIP intervention on relatives’ outcomes and received FI.A cluster randomized controlled trial, was conducted in 15 Norwegian Community Mental Health Center (CMHC) units that were randomized to either the IFIP intervention, including implementation interventions and clinical interventions, or treatment as usual (TAU). The clinical interventions consisted of FI: basic family involvement and support (BFIS) to all patients and family psychoeducation (FPE) to as many as possible. Patients with psychotic disorders and their closest relative were invited to fill in questionnaires at inclusion and 6 months and 12 months follow-up. Received FI was reported by both relatives and clinicians. The relatives’ primary outcome was satisfaction with health service support, measured by the Carer well-being and support questionnaire part B (CWS-B). The relatives’ secondary outcomes were caregiver experiences, expressed emotions and quality of life. Patients’ outcomes will be reported elsewhere.In total 231 patient/relative pairs from the CMHC units were included (135 intervention; 96 control).The relatives in the intervention arm received an increased level of BFIS (p=.007) and FPE (p < 0.05) compared to the relatives in the control arm, including involvement in crisis planning. The primary outcome for relatives’ satisfaction with health service support, showed a non-significant improvement (Cohen’s d = 0.22, p = 0.08). Relatives experienced a significant reduced level of patient dependency (Cohen’s d = -0.23, p = 0.03).The increased support from clinicians throughout FI reduced the relatives’ perceived level of patient dependency, and may have relieved the experience of responsibility and caregiver burden. The COVID-19 pandemic and the complex and pioneering study design have weakened the effectiveness of the IFIP intervention, underscoring possible potentials for further improvement in relatives’ outcomes.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03869177.","PeriodicalId":506619,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1381007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family interventions (FI) are recommended as part of the treatment for psychotic disorders, but the implementation in mental health services is generally poor. Recently, The Implementation of guidelines on Family Involvement for persons with Psychotic disorders (IFIP) trial, demonstrated significant improvements in implementation outcomes at cluster-level. This sub-study aims to examine the effectiveness of the IFIP intervention on relatives’ outcomes and received FI.A cluster randomized controlled trial, was conducted in 15 Norwegian Community Mental Health Center (CMHC) units that were randomized to either the IFIP intervention, including implementation interventions and clinical interventions, or treatment as usual (TAU). The clinical interventions consisted of FI: basic family involvement and support (BFIS) to all patients and family psychoeducation (FPE) to as many as possible. Patients with psychotic disorders and their closest relative were invited to fill in questionnaires at inclusion and 6 months and 12 months follow-up. Received FI was reported by both relatives and clinicians. The relatives’ primary outcome was satisfaction with health service support, measured by the Carer well-being and support questionnaire part B (CWS-B). The relatives’ secondary outcomes were caregiver experiences, expressed emotions and quality of life. Patients’ outcomes will be reported elsewhere.In total 231 patient/relative pairs from the CMHC units were included (135 intervention; 96 control).The relatives in the intervention arm received an increased level of BFIS (p=.007) and FPE (p < 0.05) compared to the relatives in the control arm, including involvement in crisis planning. The primary outcome for relatives’ satisfaction with health service support, showed a non-significant improvement (Cohen’s d = 0.22, p = 0.08). Relatives experienced a significant reduced level of patient dependency (Cohen’s d = -0.23, p = 0.03).The increased support from clinicians throughout FI reduced the relatives’ perceived level of patient dependency, and may have relieved the experience of responsibility and caregiver burden. The COVID-19 pandemic and the complex and pioneering study design have weakened the effectiveness of the IFIP intervention, underscoring possible potentials for further improvement in relatives’ outcomes.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03869177.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神障碍患者家庭参与指南的实施:实用分组随机试验。对亲属结果和家庭干预措施的影响
家庭干预(FI)被推荐为精神障碍治疗的一部分,但在精神健康服务中的实施情况普遍不佳。最近,"精神病患者家庭参与指南实施"(IFIP)试验表明,在组群层面的实施结果有了显著改善。这项分组随机对照试验在挪威的15个社区心理健康中心(CMHC)单位进行,这些单位被随机分配接受IFIP干预(包括实施干预和临床干预)或常规治疗(TAU)。临床干预包括FI:为所有患者提供基本的家庭参与和支持(BFIS),为尽可能多的患者提供家庭心理教育(FPE)。研究人员邀请精神病患者及其近亲在入组、6 个月和 12 个月随访时填写调查问卷。亲属和临床医生均报告了接受 FI 的情况。亲属的主要结果是对医疗服务支持的满意度,由 "照顾者福祉和支持问卷 B 部分"(CWS-B)来衡量。亲属的次要结果是照顾者的经历、表达的情感和生活质量。与对照组的亲属相比,干预组的亲属获得的BFIS(P=.007)和FPE(P<0.05)水平有所提高,包括参与危机规划。主要结果显示,亲属对医疗服务支持的满意度没有显著提高(Cohen's d = 0.22,p = 0.08)。亲属对患者的依赖程度明显降低(Cohen's d = -0.23,p = 0.03)。在整个 FI 中,临床医生提供的更多支持降低了亲属对患者的依赖程度,并减轻了他们的责任感和护理负担。COVID-19大流行以及复杂和开创性的研究设计削弱了IFIP干预的有效性,强调了进一步改善亲属预后的可能性。ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符NCT03869177。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation and narrow-band auditory stimulation on the intraoperative electroencephalogram: an exploratoratory feasibility study Post-traumatic stress disorder and associated factors among high school students who experienced war in Woldia town Applying a clinical staging model in patients affected by schizophrenia spectrum disorder Impact of psychosocial stress on facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia and controls: an experimental study in a forensic sample Serotoninergic antidepressants combination in psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1