Applying a clinical staging model in patients affected by schizophrenia spectrum disorder

R. de Filippis, E. Carbone, M. Rania, M. Aloi, C. Segura-García, P. De Fazio
{"title":"Applying a clinical staging model in patients affected by schizophrenia spectrum disorder","authors":"R. de Filippis, E. Carbone, M. Rania, M. Aloi, C. Segura-García, P. De Fazio","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical staging, already widespread in medicine, represents a new frontier in psychiatry. Our goal was to convert the existing theoretical staging model for schizophrenia into a feasible tool to have a timely assessment of patients’ health status applicable in any psychiatric facility.We assessed the empirical soundness of a staging model for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs), primarily centered on their current status. This model delineated six sequential stages (1, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, and 4) based on factors like symptom recurrence, persistence, and progression, including functional decline. Our analysis involved data from 137 individuals affected by SSDs. We examined 22 baseline variables, 23 construct-related variables, and 31 potentially modifiable clinical variables.The latter stages demonstrated significantly poorer outcomes compared to the early stages across various measures, indicating medium to large effect sizes and a dose–response pattern. This pattern confirmed the validity of the model. Notably, stages 2 and 3A exhibited pronounced differences in comparison to other stages, although variables from each validation category also distinguished between consecutive stages, particularly 3A and beyond.Baseline predictors, such as familial predisposition to schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental impairment, childhood adversities, treatment delay, negative symptoms, neurological impairment, and inadequate early response to treatment, independently largely explained the staging variance. The clinical staging model, grounded in the extended course of psychosis, exhibited sound validity and feasibility, even without the use of biological or neuroimaging markers, which could greatly improve the sensitivity of the model. These findings provide insights into stage indicators and predictors of clinical stages from the onset of psychosis.","PeriodicalId":506619,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical staging, already widespread in medicine, represents a new frontier in psychiatry. Our goal was to convert the existing theoretical staging model for schizophrenia into a feasible tool to have a timely assessment of patients’ health status applicable in any psychiatric facility.We assessed the empirical soundness of a staging model for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs), primarily centered on their current status. This model delineated six sequential stages (1, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, and 4) based on factors like symptom recurrence, persistence, and progression, including functional decline. Our analysis involved data from 137 individuals affected by SSDs. We examined 22 baseline variables, 23 construct-related variables, and 31 potentially modifiable clinical variables.The latter stages demonstrated significantly poorer outcomes compared to the early stages across various measures, indicating medium to large effect sizes and a dose–response pattern. This pattern confirmed the validity of the model. Notably, stages 2 and 3A exhibited pronounced differences in comparison to other stages, although variables from each validation category also distinguished between consecutive stages, particularly 3A and beyond.Baseline predictors, such as familial predisposition to schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental impairment, childhood adversities, treatment delay, negative symptoms, neurological impairment, and inadequate early response to treatment, independently largely explained the staging variance. The clinical staging model, grounded in the extended course of psychosis, exhibited sound validity and feasibility, even without the use of biological or neuroimaging markers, which could greatly improve the sensitivity of the model. These findings provide insights into stage indicators and predictors of clinical stages from the onset of psychosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在精神分裂症谱系障碍患者中应用临床分期模型
临床分期已在医学领域得到广泛应用,它代表了精神病学的一个新领域。我们的目标是将现有的精神分裂症理论分期模型转化为可行的工具,以便及时评估患者的健康状况,使其适用于任何精神病院。该模型根据症状复发、持续和进展(包括功能衰退)等因素划分了六个连续阶段(1、2A、2B、3A、3B 和 4)。我们的分析涉及 137 名 SSD 患者的数据。我们研究了 22 个基线变量、23 个结构相关变量和 31 个潜在可改变的临床变量。与早期阶段相比,后一阶段在各种测量指标上的结果都明显较差,显示出中等到较大的效应大小和剂量反应模式。这种模式证实了模型的有效性。值得注意的是,与其他阶段相比,2期和3A期表现出明显的差异,尽管每个验证类别的变量也能区分连续的阶段,尤其是3A期及以后的阶段。基线预测因素,如精神分裂症的家族易感性、神经发育障碍、童年逆境、治疗延迟、阴性症状、神经功能损害和早期治疗反应不足,在很大程度上独立解释了分期差异。临床分期模型以精神病的扩展病程为基础,表现出良好的有效性和可行性,即使不使用生物或神经影像标记也是如此,而生物或神经影像标记可大大提高模型的灵敏度。这些研究结果为我们提供了有关精神病发病阶段指标和临床阶段预测因素的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation and narrow-band auditory stimulation on the intraoperative electroencephalogram: an exploratoratory feasibility study Post-traumatic stress disorder and associated factors among high school students who experienced war in Woldia town Applying a clinical staging model in patients affected by schizophrenia spectrum disorder Impact of psychosocial stress on facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia and controls: an experimental study in a forensic sample Serotoninergic antidepressants combination in psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1