Segregation test—a standardisable test for suffusion assessment of granular soils

IF 1.827 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Arabian Journal of Geosciences Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1007/s12517-024-11988-3
Peter To, Soo Vang, Shenese Dempsey, Jayden van Donderen-Livock, Rico Saayman
{"title":"Segregation test—a standardisable test for suffusion assessment of granular soils","authors":"Peter To,&nbsp;Soo Vang,&nbsp;Shenese Dempsey,&nbsp;Jayden van Donderen-Livock,&nbsp;Rico Saayman","doi":"10.1007/s12517-024-11988-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Suffusion is arguably the most complicated type of internal erosion. Although there are several popular assessment methods, the most realiable assessment is possibly still laboratory testing. However, there is not a standardised test for suffusion yet as different laboratories use different equipment and test configurations. Hence, a reliable comparison of outcomes across laboratories may not be able to achieve yet. This paper presents a new and simple, but very effective, way to test the susceptibility of soil to internal erosion using a novel segregation test. The test employs standard equipment which can be easily found in any geotechnical laboratory. There are some common characteristics of internal erosion and transport segregation, where fine particles are transported through the pore constrictions formed by the soil’s primary fabric. In segregation, particles are transported by gravitational/mechanical force to the bottom of the soil mass. Meanwhile, they are washed out of the soil mass by hydraulic force in internal erosion. Laboratory testing for internal erosion often requires specific equipment and a long duration. Meanwhile, segregation test could be undertaken with standardised sieving tower, which is available in any geotechnical laboratory. The approach was verified with an acrylic setup and some 3D-printed details. Later, the tests of 25 mixtures were undertaken with standard sieving sets. The correlation of laboratory results shows good agreement and prompts the common application of the new approach. The new test may not be able to completely replace the conventional suffusion test yet as it overlooks the critical hydraulic gradients at this stage, but it can be very useful if the research focuses on only the erodible mass and susceptibility to suffusion. In addition, it is a standardisable test with no specific requirements on equipment. The new approach may also be a starting point to study other types of internal erosion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-024-11988-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-024-11988-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suffusion is arguably the most complicated type of internal erosion. Although there are several popular assessment methods, the most realiable assessment is possibly still laboratory testing. However, there is not a standardised test for suffusion yet as different laboratories use different equipment and test configurations. Hence, a reliable comparison of outcomes across laboratories may not be able to achieve yet. This paper presents a new and simple, but very effective, way to test the susceptibility of soil to internal erosion using a novel segregation test. The test employs standard equipment which can be easily found in any geotechnical laboratory. There are some common characteristics of internal erosion and transport segregation, where fine particles are transported through the pore constrictions formed by the soil’s primary fabric. In segregation, particles are transported by gravitational/mechanical force to the bottom of the soil mass. Meanwhile, they are washed out of the soil mass by hydraulic force in internal erosion. Laboratory testing for internal erosion often requires specific equipment and a long duration. Meanwhile, segregation test could be undertaken with standardised sieving tower, which is available in any geotechnical laboratory. The approach was verified with an acrylic setup and some 3D-printed details. Later, the tests of 25 mixtures were undertaken with standard sieving sets. The correlation of laboratory results shows good agreement and prompts the common application of the new approach. The new test may not be able to completely replace the conventional suffusion test yet as it overlooks the critical hydraulic gradients at this stage, but it can be very useful if the research focuses on only the erodible mass and susceptibility to suffusion. In addition, it is a standardisable test with no specific requirements on equipment. The new approach may also be a starting point to study other types of internal erosion.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
离析试验--用于粒状土窒息评估的标准化试验
可以说,溶胀是最复杂的内侵蚀类型。虽然有几种流行的评估方法,但最可行的评估可能还是实验室测试。然而,由于不同的实验室使用不同的设备和测试配置,目前还没有一个标准的胀破测试方法。因此,还无法对不同实验室的结果进行可靠的比较。本文介绍了一种新颖、简单但非常有效的方法,即使用新型隔离测试来测试土壤对内部侵蚀的敏感性。该测试采用的标准设备在任何土工实验室都很容易找到。内侵蚀和迁移离析有一些共同的特征,即细颗粒通过土壤原生结构形成的孔隙收缩进行迁移。在离析过程中,颗粒在重力/机械力的作用下被带到土体底部。同时,在内力侵蚀中,颗粒会被水力冲出土体。内侵蚀实验室测试通常需要特定的设备和较长的时间。与此同时,离析测试可通过标准化筛分塔进行,任何土工实验室都有这种设备。该方法通过丙烯酸装置和一些 3D 打印的细节进行了验证。随后,使用标准筛分装置对 25 种混合物进行了测试。实验室结果的相关性显示出良好的一致性,并促使新方法的普遍应用。新试验可能还无法完全取代传统的淤积试验,因为它在现阶段忽略了临界水力梯度,但如果研究重点仅放在可侵蚀性质量和淤积敏感性上,它可能会非常有用。此外,这是一种可标准化的试验,对设备没有具体要求。新方法也可以作为研究其他类型内侵蚀的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Arabian Journal of Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1587
审稿时长
6.7 months
期刊介绍: The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone. Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Paleocurrent analysis, provenance, and tectonic setting of the late Paleozoic to early Mesozoic sandstones from Fincha’a Valley, Blue Nile Basin, Northwestern Ethiopia Estimation of shoreline changes using digital shoreline analysis systems (DSAS 5.0) from Pondicherry to Point Calimere, Southeast Coast of India Heterogeneous crustal structures along the central dead sea fault system: evidence from seismic tomography A study of the reservoir fluid properties and phase behavior of Titas gas field Assessment of radon-222 levels in groundwater and drinking water and evaluation of health and environmental risks in Al-Baitha and surrounding areas southeast of Baghdad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1