Toward a better understanding of self-regulation promoting interventions: When performance management and job crafting meet

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Human Resource Management Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1002/hrm.22236
Evangelia Demerouti, Colin Roth, Katharina Ebner, Roman Soucek, Klaus Moser
{"title":"Toward a better understanding of self-regulation promoting interventions: When performance management and job crafting meet","authors":"Evangelia Demerouti,&nbsp;Colin Roth,&nbsp;Katharina Ebner,&nbsp;Roman Soucek,&nbsp;Klaus Moser","doi":"10.1002/hrm.22236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organizations utilize self-regulation promoting interventions to empower employees in managing challenges and resources autonomously. However, there is limited understanding of how these interventions impact employee task performance and innovative behavior, as well as which processes are critical for their effectiveness. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted to examine the effects of two self-regulation promoting interventions—the Productivity Measurement and Enhancement Systems intervention (ProMES), a job crafting intervention, and their combination—on individual employee performance and innovation through selected process variables. We collected data before, during, and after the interventions over 16 weeks among 123 employees across three experimental and one control group. Consistent with predictions, participants of the ProMES intervention reported a higher level of perceived team climate, which consequently contributed to greater individual innovative behavior. Participants in the job crafting intervention exhibited an increase in job crafting behaviors, which consequently increased innovative behavior and task performance. Unexpectedly, the combined intervention yielded negative effects on both innovative behavior and task performance. The findings suggest that while self-regulation promoting interventions increase favorable outcomes through different mechanisms their combination may impair relevant processes and, more generally, overwhelm employees.</p>","PeriodicalId":48310,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management","volume":"63 5","pages":"849-867"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hrm.22236","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrm.22236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations utilize self-regulation promoting interventions to empower employees in managing challenges and resources autonomously. However, there is limited understanding of how these interventions impact employee task performance and innovative behavior, as well as which processes are critical for their effectiveness. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted to examine the effects of two self-regulation promoting interventions—the Productivity Measurement and Enhancement Systems intervention (ProMES), a job crafting intervention, and their combination—on individual employee performance and innovation through selected process variables. We collected data before, during, and after the interventions over 16 weeks among 123 employees across three experimental and one control group. Consistent with predictions, participants of the ProMES intervention reported a higher level of perceived team climate, which consequently contributed to greater individual innovative behavior. Participants in the job crafting intervention exhibited an increase in job crafting behaviors, which consequently increased innovative behavior and task performance. Unexpectedly, the combined intervention yielded negative effects on both innovative behavior and task performance. The findings suggest that while self-regulation promoting interventions increase favorable outcomes through different mechanisms their combination may impair relevant processes and, more generally, overwhelm employees.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更好地理解促进自我调节的干预措施:当绩效管理和工作精心设计相遇
组织利用促进自我调节的干预措施来增强员工自主管理挑战和资源的能力。然而,对于这些干预措施如何影响员工的任务绩效和创新行为,以及哪些过程对其有效性至关重要,人们的了解还很有限。因此,我们开展了一项现场实验,通过选定的过程变量来研究两种促进自我调节的干预措施--生产力测量和提升系统干预措施(ProMES)、工作设计干预措施以及它们的组合--对员工个人绩效和创新的影响。我们收集了三个实验组和一个对照组的 123 名员工在干预前、干预期间和干预后 16 周内的数据。与预测一致的是,ProMES 干预方案的参与者报告了更高水平的团队氛围感知,从而促进了更多的个人创新行为。工作设计干预的参与者表现出更多的工作设计行为,从而提高了创新行为和任务绩效。意想不到的是,综合干预对创新行为和任务绩效都产生了负面影响。研究结果表明,虽然促进自我调节的干预措施通过不同的机制增加了有利的结果,但它们的组合可能会损害相关的过程,更广泛地说,会使员工不知所措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Covering the broad spectrum of contemporary human resource management, this journal provides academics and practicing managers with the latest concepts, tools, and information for effective problem solving and decision making in this field. Broad in scope, it explores issues of societal, organizational, and individual relevance. Journal articles discuss new theories, new techniques, case studies, models, and research trends of particular significance to practicing HR managers
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Mistreated but Still Resilient! Unraveling the Role of Servant Leadership in Mitigating the Adverse Consequences of Care Recipients' Incivility Issue Information Relational incongruence in neurodiverse workgroups: Practices for cultivating autistic employee authenticity and belonging Workforce neurodiversity and workplace avoidance behavior: The role of inclusive leadership, relational energy, and self‐control demands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1