Validation of Doppler Wind LiDAR measurements with an Uncrewed Aerial System (UAS) in the daytime atmospheric boundary layer

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1175/jtech-d-23-0127.1
Jakob Boventer, Matteo Bramati, Vasileios Savvakis, F. Beyrich, Markus Kayser, A. Platis, J. Bange
{"title":"Validation of Doppler Wind LiDAR measurements with an Uncrewed Aerial System (UAS) in the daytime atmospheric boundary layer","authors":"Jakob Boventer, Matteo Bramati, Vasileios Savvakis, F. Beyrich, Markus Kayser, A. Platis, J. Bange","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-23-0127.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nOne of the most widely used systems for wind speed and direction observations at meteorological sites is based on Doppler Wind LiDAR (DWL) technology. The wind vector derivation strategies of these instruments rely on the assumption of stationary and homogeneous horizontal wind, which is often not the case over heterogeneous terrain. This study focuses on the validation of two DWL systems, operated by the German Weather Service (DWD) and installed at the boundary layer field site Falkenberg (Lindenberg, Germany), with respect to measurements from a small, fixed-wing uncrewed aircraft system (UAS) of type MASC-3. A wind vector intercomparison at an altitude range from 100 to 500 m between DWL and UAS was performed, after a quality control of the aircraft’s data accuracy against a cup anemometer and wind vane mounted on a meteorological mast also operating at the location. Both DWL systems exhibit an overall root mean square difference in wind vector retrieval of less than 22% for wind speed and lower than 18° for wind direction. The enhancement or deterioration of these statistics is analyzed with respect to scanning height and atmospheric stability. The limitations of this type of validation approach are highlighted and accounted for in the analysis.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-23-0127.1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most widely used systems for wind speed and direction observations at meteorological sites is based on Doppler Wind LiDAR (DWL) technology. The wind vector derivation strategies of these instruments rely on the assumption of stationary and homogeneous horizontal wind, which is often not the case over heterogeneous terrain. This study focuses on the validation of two DWL systems, operated by the German Weather Service (DWD) and installed at the boundary layer field site Falkenberg (Lindenberg, Germany), with respect to measurements from a small, fixed-wing uncrewed aircraft system (UAS) of type MASC-3. A wind vector intercomparison at an altitude range from 100 to 500 m between DWL and UAS was performed, after a quality control of the aircraft’s data accuracy against a cup anemometer and wind vane mounted on a meteorological mast also operating at the location. Both DWL systems exhibit an overall root mean square difference in wind vector retrieval of less than 22% for wind speed and lower than 18° for wind direction. The enhancement or deterioration of these statistics is analyzed with respect to scanning height and atmospheric stability. The limitations of this type of validation approach are highlighted and accounted for in the analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用无人机系统(UAS)验证白天大气边界层中的多普勒风激光雷达测量结果
基于多普勒风激光雷达(DWL)技术的风速和风向观测系统是气象站使用最广泛的系统之一。这些仪器的风矢量推导策略依赖于静止和均匀水平风的假设,而在多变地形上往往并非如此。本研究的重点是验证由德国气象局(DWD)运营并安装在法尔肯贝格(德国林登贝格)边界层现场的两套 DWL 系统与 MASC-3 型小型固定翼无人驾驶飞机系统(UAS)的测量结果。DWL 和 UAS 在 100 米至 500 米的高度范围内进行了风矢量相互比较,在此之前,对飞机的数据精度与安装在该地点气象桅杆上的杯式风速计和风向标进行了质量控制。两个 DWL 系统在风速和风向的风向矢量检索方面的总均方根差均小于 22%,小于 18°。这些统计数据的增强或减弱与扫描高度和大气稳定性有关。分析中强调并考虑了这种验证方法的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Catalysis over Isolated and Nested Lewis Acid Centers and Noble Metal Centers Anchored by Nested Lewis Acid Centers in Zeolites Structure and Dynamics of Membrane Proteins in Native Cellular Membranes Revealed by In Situ Solid-State NMR. Exploiting Pnictogen σ/π-Hole Interactions for Visible-Light-Induced Radical Transformations. NIR Excitation in Atomically Precise Nanoclusters via Two-Photon and Three-Photon Absorption. Transition-Metal Hydride Catalysis Meets Nitrenoid Transfer: Design Principles for Precision C–N Bond Formation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1