Equity in German Private Law

Reinhard Bork
{"title":"Equity in German Private Law","authors":"Reinhard Bork","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2024.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The German legal system, as in most continental legal systems, is primarily based on statutes. When deciding a case, judges apply the law as written in norms and do not put their own idea of a just and equitable result in place of the solution provided by the legislature. Seen in this light, statutes are “curdled equity”. This leaves little room for deciding a case under the principle of equity, understood as a means to find a resolution of the tension between the abstract-general provisions of the law and the particularities of the case at hand, i.e., the establishment of justice in individual cases. In this article, the relationship between statute and equity will be illustrated for German private law, highlighting the principle (predominance of statutes) and the exemptions (gateways to equity for legislature and courts). Further examples from German insolvency law complete the picture.","PeriodicalId":158742,"journal":{"name":"AUC IURIDICA","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUC IURIDICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The German legal system, as in most continental legal systems, is primarily based on statutes. When deciding a case, judges apply the law as written in norms and do not put their own idea of a just and equitable result in place of the solution provided by the legislature. Seen in this light, statutes are “curdled equity”. This leaves little room for deciding a case under the principle of equity, understood as a means to find a resolution of the tension between the abstract-general provisions of the law and the particularities of the case at hand, i.e., the establishment of justice in individual cases. In this article, the relationship between statute and equity will be illustrated for German private law, highlighting the principle (predominance of statutes) and the exemptions (gateways to equity for legislature and courts). Further examples from German insolvency law complete the picture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国私法中的股权
德国的法律体系与大多数欧洲大陆的法律体系一样,主要以成文法为基础。在裁决案件时,法官适用成文规范中的法律,而不会以自己对公正和公平结果的理解来取代立法机构提供的解决方案。从这个角度看,法规是 "凝固的公平"。这就为根据公平原则裁决案件留下了很小的空间,公平原则被理解为解决法律的抽象一般性规定与案件的特殊性之间的紧张关系的一种手段,即在个案中确立正义。本文将以德国私法为例说明成文法与衡平法之间的关系,强调原则(成文法的主导地位)和豁免(立法机构和法院通向衡平法的途径)。德国破产法中的更多例子将使文章更加完整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
National Report on Automation in Decision-Making in Public Administration in Slovakia Tracing the Evolutionary Path of Experimental Law: from Comparative Law to Regulatory Sandboxes National Report on Automation in Decision-Making in Civil Procedure in the Czech Republic Artificial Public Administration – Myth or Reality? The Advent of Space Administrative Law in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1