Analysis And Reason For Discard Of Blood Products: A Retrospective Study In A Tertiary Care Hospital Blood Bank From Parul Sevashram Hospital, Vadodara.

Dhruvi Patel, Shifa Ghanchi
{"title":"Analysis And Reason For Discard Of Blood Products: A Retrospective Study In A Tertiary Care Hospital Blood Bank From Parul Sevashram Hospital, Vadodara.","authors":"Dhruvi Patel, Shifa Ghanchi","doi":"10.55640/ijmsdh-10-05-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A life-saving procedure is a blood transfusion, but there is often a shortage in blood supply due to various factors. Despite the enormous advancements in medical research, there is still no substitute for blood, making blood transfusions a crucial component of contemporary healthcare. The study aimed to evaluate the discard reasons for blood components, particularly Fresh Frozen Plasma, Platelet Concentration, and Red Cell Concentration and to suggest possible strategies to reduce wastage. Methods: The Retrospective analysis of discarded blood components was carried out from July, 1st 2023 to December 31st 2023 in the blood bank of Parul Sevashram. Data was collected using a discard register and computer data of discard available in blood bank and was analysed in SPSS software version 26.0 and Microsoft Excel. The wastage rate was calculated with a percentage of total number of units wastage against the total number of collections. Results: A total of 4990 blood component were prepared out of which 706 blood component was discarded. The total discard ratio of the study was 14.14%. Total replacement donors were 83.91% and 16.31% were voluntary donations. The discard rate for PC, RCC, and FFP was 86.30%, 6.82%, and 2.01%. HbsAg was the most common reason for the discard due to seropositivity of TTIs. Conclusion: The Most common component discarded was platelet and the reason for discard was the date of expiry due to non-utilization. Seropositivity was the reason for discarding red cell concentration and leakage was the most common reason for fresh frozen plasma. The wastage can be reduced by implementing proper strategies such as FIFO policy, avoiding Mega camps, proper staff training and wastage reduced protocol.","PeriodicalId":503011,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health","volume":"84 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmsdh-10-05-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A life-saving procedure is a blood transfusion, but there is often a shortage in blood supply due to various factors. Despite the enormous advancements in medical research, there is still no substitute for blood, making blood transfusions a crucial component of contemporary healthcare. The study aimed to evaluate the discard reasons for blood components, particularly Fresh Frozen Plasma, Platelet Concentration, and Red Cell Concentration and to suggest possible strategies to reduce wastage. Methods: The Retrospective analysis of discarded blood components was carried out from July, 1st 2023 to December 31st 2023 in the blood bank of Parul Sevashram. Data was collected using a discard register and computer data of discard available in blood bank and was analysed in SPSS software version 26.0 and Microsoft Excel. The wastage rate was calculated with a percentage of total number of units wastage against the total number of collections. Results: A total of 4990 blood component were prepared out of which 706 blood component was discarded. The total discard ratio of the study was 14.14%. Total replacement donors were 83.91% and 16.31% were voluntary donations. The discard rate for PC, RCC, and FFP was 86.30%, 6.82%, and 2.01%. HbsAg was the most common reason for the discard due to seropositivity of TTIs. Conclusion: The Most common component discarded was platelet and the reason for discard was the date of expiry due to non-utilization. Seropositivity was the reason for discarding red cell concentration and leakage was the most common reason for fresh frozen plasma. The wastage can be reduced by implementing proper strategies such as FIFO policy, avoiding Mega camps, proper staff training and wastage reduced protocol.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液制品废弃原因分析:瓦多达拉 Parul Sevashram 医院三级医院血库的回顾性研究。
背景:输血是一种挽救生命的程序,但由于各种因素,血液供应经常短缺。尽管医学研究取得了巨大进步,但血液仍无可替代,因此输血成为当代医疗保健的重要组成部分。本研究旨在评估血液成分的废弃原因,尤其是新鲜冷冻血浆、血小板浓度和红细胞浓度,并提出减少浪费的可能策略。研究方法从 2023 年 7 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日,在 Parul Sevashram 血库对废弃血液成分进行了回顾性分析。数据通过血库中的废弃登记册和计算机废弃数据收集,并通过 26.0 版 SPSS 软件和 Microsoft Excel 进行分析。损耗率按损耗单位总数与采集总数的百分比计算。结果:共制备了 4990 个血液成分,其中 706 个血液成分被丢弃。该研究的总丢弃率为 14.14%。替代捐献者占 83.91%,自愿捐献者占 16.31%。PC、RCC 和 FFP 的废弃率分别为 86.30%、6.82% 和 2.01%。HbsAg 是最常见的弃捐原因,因为 TTIs 血清阳性。结论被丢弃的最常见成分是血小板,丢弃的原因是由于未使用而过期。血清阳性是红细胞浓度被丢弃的原因,而泄漏是新鲜冰冻血浆被丢弃的最常见原因。通过实施适当的策略,如先进先出政策、避免 Mega 营、适当的员工培训和减少浪费协议,可以减少浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The relationship between Fatty Acids and Type II Diabetes Mellitus Evaluation of osseointegration and functionality in immediate implant-supported prostheses following sinus lift surgeries: A systematic narrative review. The Potential of Crocus sativus in the treatment of Burns—mini Review Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy Combined With Scaling And Root Planning In The Treatment Of Chronic Periodontitis: A Systematic Literature Review. CUES TO ACTION PREDICTORS OF THE COMPLETENESS POLIO VACCINATION IN SUB PIN POLIO IN BIREUEN DISTRICT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1