3D View Factor Power Output Modelling of Bifacial Fixed, Single, and Dual-Axis Agrivoltaic Systems

S. Zainali, Silvia Ma Lu, Eleonora Potenza, B. Stridh, A. Avelin, P. Campana
{"title":"3D View Factor Power Output Modelling of Bifacial Fixed, Single, and Dual-Axis Agrivoltaic Systems","authors":"S. Zainali, Silvia Ma Lu, Eleonora Potenza, B. Stridh, A. Avelin, P. Campana","doi":"10.52825/agripv.v2i.1003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the performance of agrivoltaic systems employing bifacial photovoltaic modules. A comparison between yield in Sweden and Italy was carried out. Three agrivoltaic system designs were evaluated: vertical fixed, single-axis tracker, and dual-axis tracker. The results showed that the specific production varied between 1090 to 1440 kWh/kWp/yr in Sweden and 1584 to 2112 kWh/kWp/yr in Italy, where the lowest production was obtained with the vertical fixed agrivoltaic system while the highest production was obtained with the dual-axis tracking agrivoltaic system. The vertical fixed design had a higher electricity production during low solar elevation angles, while the single-axis and dual-axis tracking designs had significantly higher power production during mid-day. The electricity production gain using a dual-axis tracker design was mostly during mid-day, but the increase compared to the single-axis tracker was only 1-2%. The study concludes that low-height, fixed agrivoltaic systems without tracking are well-suited for high-latitude countries like Sweden, while elevated systems with tracker solutions are more suitable for locations like Italy. The findings suggest that the performance of agrivoltaic systems with bifacial photovoltaic modules is highly dependent on geographical location and the specific characteristics of the crops grown beneath them.","PeriodicalId":517222,"journal":{"name":"AgriVoltaics Conference Proceedings","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriVoltaics Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52825/agripv.v2i.1003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of agrivoltaic systems employing bifacial photovoltaic modules. A comparison between yield in Sweden and Italy was carried out. Three agrivoltaic system designs were evaluated: vertical fixed, single-axis tracker, and dual-axis tracker. The results showed that the specific production varied between 1090 to 1440 kWh/kWp/yr in Sweden and 1584 to 2112 kWh/kWp/yr in Italy, where the lowest production was obtained with the vertical fixed agrivoltaic system while the highest production was obtained with the dual-axis tracking agrivoltaic system. The vertical fixed design had a higher electricity production during low solar elevation angles, while the single-axis and dual-axis tracking designs had significantly higher power production during mid-day. The electricity production gain using a dual-axis tracker design was mostly during mid-day, but the increase compared to the single-axis tracker was only 1-2%. The study concludes that low-height, fixed agrivoltaic systems without tracking are well-suited for high-latitude countries like Sweden, while elevated systems with tracker solutions are more suitable for locations like Italy. The findings suggest that the performance of agrivoltaic systems with bifacial photovoltaic modules is highly dependent on geographical location and the specific characteristics of the crops grown beneath them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双面固定式、单轴和双轴农用光伏系统的 3D 视角系数功率输出建模
本研究调查了采用双面光伏组件的农业光伏系统的性能。对瑞典和意大利的产量进行了比较。对三种农业光伏系统设计进行了评估:垂直固定式、单轴跟踪器和双轴跟踪器。结果表明,瑞典的具体发电量在 1090 至 1440 kWh/kWp/yr 之间变化,意大利的具体发电量在 1584 至 2112 kWh/kWp/yr 之间变化,其中垂直固定式光伏发电系统的发电量最低,而双轴跟踪式光伏发电系统的发电量最高。垂直固定式设计在低太阳仰角时发电量较高,而单轴和双轴跟踪式设计在中午时发电量明显较高。采用双轴跟踪器设计的发电量收益主要集中在中午,但与单轴跟踪器相比,增幅仅为 1-2%。研究得出结论,低高度、无跟踪的固定式农业光伏系统非常适合像瑞典这样的高纬度国家,而采用跟踪器解决方案的高架系统则更适合像意大利这样的地区。研究结果表明,采用双面光伏组件的农用光伏系统的性能在很大程度上取决于地理位置和系统下方种植作物的具体特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measurement of Light Interception by Crops under Solar Panels using PARbars Agrivoltaics in Germany - Status Quo and Future Developments Vertical Agrivoltaics System on Arable Crops in Central France: Feedback of the First Year of Operation New Legal Framework of Agrivoltaics in Germany Modelling Light Interception by Rows of Tall-Growing Crops in an Agri-PV System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1