Direct Clinical Applications of Natural Language Processing in Common Neurological Disorders: Scoping Review

JMIR neurotechnology Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.2196/51822
Ilana Lefkovitz, Samantha Walsh, L. J. Blank, Nathalie Jetté, Benjamin R Kummer
{"title":"Direct Clinical Applications of Natural Language Processing in Common Neurological Disorders: Scoping Review","authors":"Ilana Lefkovitz, Samantha Walsh, L. J. Blank, Nathalie Jetté, Benjamin R Kummer","doi":"10.2196/51822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Natural language processing (NLP), a branch of artificial intelligence that analyzes unstructured language, is being increasingly used in health care. However, the extent to which NLP has been formally studied in neurological disorders remains unclear.\n \n \n \n We sought to characterize studies that applied NLP to the diagnosis, prediction, or treatment of common neurological disorders.\n \n \n \n This review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) standards. The search was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase on May 11, 2022. Studies of NLP use in migraine, Parkinson disease, Alzheimer disease, stroke and transient ischemic attack, epilepsy, or multiple sclerosis were included. We excluded conference abstracts, review papers, as well as studies involving heterogeneous clinical populations or indirect clinical uses of NLP. Study characteristics were extracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics. We did not aggregate measurements of performance in our review due to the high variability in study outcomes, which is the main limitation of the study.\n \n \n \n In total, 916 studies were identified, of which 41 (4.5%) met all eligibility criteria and were included in the final review. Of the 41 included studies, the most frequently represented disorders were stroke and transient ischemic attack (n=20, 49%), followed by epilepsy (n=10, 24%), Alzheimer disease (n=6, 15%), and multiple sclerosis (n=5, 12%). We found no studies of NLP use in migraine or Parkinson disease that met our eligibility criteria. The main objective of NLP was diagnosis (n=20, 49%), followed by disease phenotyping (n=17, 41%), prognostication (n=9, 22%), and treatment (n=4, 10%). In total, 18 (44%) studies used only machine learning approaches, 6 (15%) used only rule-based methods, and 17 (41%) used both.\n \n \n \n We found that NLP was most commonly applied for diagnosis, implying a potential role for NLP in augmenting diagnostic accuracy in settings with limited access to neurological expertise. We also found several gaps in neurological NLP research, with few to no studies addressing certain disorders, which may suggest additional areas of inquiry.\n \n \n \n Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42021228703; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=228703\n","PeriodicalId":73555,"journal":{"name":"JMIR neurotechnology","volume":"54 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR neurotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/51822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP), a branch of artificial intelligence that analyzes unstructured language, is being increasingly used in health care. However, the extent to which NLP has been formally studied in neurological disorders remains unclear. We sought to characterize studies that applied NLP to the diagnosis, prediction, or treatment of common neurological disorders. This review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) standards. The search was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase on May 11, 2022. Studies of NLP use in migraine, Parkinson disease, Alzheimer disease, stroke and transient ischemic attack, epilepsy, or multiple sclerosis were included. We excluded conference abstracts, review papers, as well as studies involving heterogeneous clinical populations or indirect clinical uses of NLP. Study characteristics were extracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics. We did not aggregate measurements of performance in our review due to the high variability in study outcomes, which is the main limitation of the study. In total, 916 studies were identified, of which 41 (4.5%) met all eligibility criteria and were included in the final review. Of the 41 included studies, the most frequently represented disorders were stroke and transient ischemic attack (n=20, 49%), followed by epilepsy (n=10, 24%), Alzheimer disease (n=6, 15%), and multiple sclerosis (n=5, 12%). We found no studies of NLP use in migraine or Parkinson disease that met our eligibility criteria. The main objective of NLP was diagnosis (n=20, 49%), followed by disease phenotyping (n=17, 41%), prognostication (n=9, 22%), and treatment (n=4, 10%). In total, 18 (44%) studies used only machine learning approaches, 6 (15%) used only rule-based methods, and 17 (41%) used both. We found that NLP was most commonly applied for diagnosis, implying a potential role for NLP in augmenting diagnostic accuracy in settings with limited access to neurological expertise. We also found several gaps in neurological NLP research, with few to no studies addressing certain disorders, which may suggest additional areas of inquiry. Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42021228703; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=228703
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然语言处理在常见神经系统疾病中的直接临床应用:范围审查
自然语言处理(NLP)是人工智能的一个分支,用于分析非结构化语言,目前正越来越多地应用于医疗保健领域。然而,NLP在神经系统疾病中的正式研究程度仍不明确。 我们试图找出将 NLP 应用于常见神经系统疾病诊断、预测或治疗的研究的特点。 本综述遵循了 PRISMA-ScR(《系统综述和元分析扩展范围综述的首选报告项目》)标准。检索于 2022 年 5 月 11 日通过 MEDLINE 和 Embase 进行。纳入了有关 NLP 用于偏头痛、帕金森病、阿尔茨海默病、中风和短暂性脑缺血发作、癫痫或多发性硬化症的研究。我们排除了会议摘要、综述论文以及涉及异质性临床人群或 NLP 间接临床应用的研究。我们采用描述性统计方法提取并分析了研究特征。由于研究结果的可变性较高,我们没有在综述中对绩效进行汇总测量,这也是本研究的主要局限性。 总共确定了 916 项研究,其中 41 项(4.5%)符合所有资格标准,被纳入最终综述。在纳入的 41 项研究中,最常见的疾病是中风和短暂性脑缺血发作(20 项,占 49%),其次是癫痫(10 项,占 24%)、阿尔茨海默病(6 项,占 15%)和多发性硬化(5 项,占 12%)。我们没有发现任何关于 NLP 用于偏头痛或帕金森病的研究符合我们的资格标准。NLP的主要目的是诊断(20人,占49%),其次是疾病表型(17人,占41%)、预后(9人,占22%)和治疗(4人,占10%)。总共有 18 项研究(44%)只使用了机器学习方法,6 项研究(15%)只使用了基于规则的方法,17 项研究(41%)同时使用了这两种方法。 我们发现,NLP 最常被用于诊断,这意味着在神经学专业知识有限的情况下,NLP 在提高诊断准确性方面具有潜在的作用。我们还发现了神经学NLP研究中的几个空白点,针对某些疾病的研究很少,甚至没有,这可能暗示了更多的研究领域。 系统综述前瞻性注册表 (PROSPERO) CRD42021228703; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=228703
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smartphone Pupillometry and Machine Learning for Detection of Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Cohort Study Direct Clinical Applications of Natural Language Processing in Common Neurological Disorders: Scoping Review Virtual Reality–Based Neurorehabilitation Support Tool for People With Cognitive Impairments Resulting From an Acquired Brain Injury: Usability and Feasibility Study The Easy and Versatile Neural Recording Platform (T-REX): Design and Development Study Connect Brain, a Mobile App for Studying Depth Perception in Angiography Visualization: Gamification Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1