Two Racial Capitalisms: Marxism, Domination, and Resistance in Cedric Robinson and Stuart Hall

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Antipode Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1111/anti.13054
Marcel Paret, Zachary Levenson
{"title":"Two Racial Capitalisms: Marxism, Domination, and Resistance in Cedric Robinson and Stuart Hall","authors":"Marcel Paret,&nbsp;Zachary Levenson","doi":"10.1111/anti.13054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The popularity of the concept of “racial capitalism” has exploded over the past decade, penetrating both academic and activist circles. Two thinkers have been foundational to this revival: Cedric Robinson and Stuart Hall. Whereas previous scholarship has tended to merge these two thinkers into a single framework, we argue that they develop divergent, and potentially irreconcilable, theories of racial capitalism. Robinson and Hall both challenge an orthodox Marxism that crudely reads politics from class position, and both point to the constitutive roles of culture and racism in mass mobilisation. Yet they diverge in two key ways. First, they root their theories in incongruous systemic logics: Robinson emphasises racial differentiation and domination, whereas Hall emphasises the maintenance of capitalist hegemony. And second, Robinson's theories of domination and resistance are rooted in spatial connections, most importantly via Western racialism and what he calls the Black radical tradition, both of which envelop the globe. By contrast, Hall insists on the spatial fragmentation of domination and resistance, which emerge as conjunctural articulations in specific contexts. Challenging the idea that there is a singular racial capitalism lens or frame, we urge scholars and activists alike to rigorously interrogate the specific mechanisms linking racism and capitalism.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"56 5","pages":"1802-1829"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anti.13054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.13054","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The popularity of the concept of “racial capitalism” has exploded over the past decade, penetrating both academic and activist circles. Two thinkers have been foundational to this revival: Cedric Robinson and Stuart Hall. Whereas previous scholarship has tended to merge these two thinkers into a single framework, we argue that they develop divergent, and potentially irreconcilable, theories of racial capitalism. Robinson and Hall both challenge an orthodox Marxism that crudely reads politics from class position, and both point to the constitutive roles of culture and racism in mass mobilisation. Yet they diverge in two key ways. First, they root their theories in incongruous systemic logics: Robinson emphasises racial differentiation and domination, whereas Hall emphasises the maintenance of capitalist hegemony. And second, Robinson's theories of domination and resistance are rooted in spatial connections, most importantly via Western racialism and what he calls the Black radical tradition, both of which envelop the globe. By contrast, Hall insists on the spatial fragmentation of domination and resistance, which emerge as conjunctural articulations in specific contexts. Challenging the idea that there is a singular racial capitalism lens or frame, we urge scholars and activists alike to rigorously interrogate the specific mechanisms linking racism and capitalism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种种族资本主义:塞德里克-罗宾逊和斯图亚特-霍尔的马克思主义、统治与反抗
在过去十年中,"种族资本主义 "这一概念的受欢迎程度呈爆炸式增长,已经渗透到学术界和活动家的圈子里。有两位思想家对这一复兴起到了奠基作用:塞德里克-罗宾逊(Cedric Robinson)和斯图尔特-霍尔(Stuart Hall)。以往的学术研究倾向于将这两位思想家并入一个单一的框架,而我们则认为,他们提出了不同的种族资本主义理论,而且可能是不可调和的。罗宾逊和霍尔都对粗暴地从阶级立场解读政治的正统马克思主义提出了挑战,并都指出了文化和种族主义在群众动员中的构成性作用。但他们在两个关键方面存在分歧。首先,他们的理论根植于不协调的系统逻辑:罗宾逊强调种族分化和统治,而霍尔则强调资本主义霸权的维护。其次,罗宾逊的统治和反抗理论植根于空间联系,最重要的是通过西方种族主义和他所谓的黑人激进传统,两者都覆盖全球。与此相反,霍尔坚持认为统治与反抗在空间上是割裂的,它们是在特定环境下的结合体。我们对存在一个单一的种族资本主义视角或框架的观点提出质疑,并敦促学者和活动家们严格审视种族主义与资本主义之间的具体联系机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Referees, July 2023–June 2024 Offshore Citizenship: “Diversified Citizenship Portfolios” and the Regulatory Arbitrage of Global Wealth Elites Resisting Post-Political Adaptation to Climate Change: How a Small Community Stood Up to Big Development Sports Cages as Social Infrastructure: Sociality, Context, and Contest in Hackney's Cages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1