Comparison of Spectral and Temporal Processing Abilities between Adults with Stroke and Healthy Peers

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Auditory and Vestibular Research Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.18502/avr.v33i3.15505
Fateme Molla Ali Akbari, S. Mehrkian, P. Afshari, Enayatollah Bakhshi
{"title":"Comparison of Spectral and Temporal Processing Abilities between Adults with Stroke and Healthy Peers","authors":"Fateme Molla Ali Akbari, S. Mehrkian, P. Afshari, Enayatollah Bakhshi","doi":"10.18502/avr.v33i3.15505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Perception of speech in noise (SIN) is based on the accurate extraction of spectral and temporal cues. Disruption of this process can reduce the productivity of the spectral and temporal features of the target stimulus and speech recognition in noise. Auditory processing disorder is one of the main challenges of people with stroke, which leads to social, mental, and even physical failures. This study aimed to investigate the spectral and temporal processing abilities of people with stroke compared to healthy peers. \nMethods: In this study, participants were 15 patients with stroke referred to the neurology clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital and 30 healthy people aged 20–60 years. Spectral Modulation Detection Test (SMDT), Pitch Pattern Sequencing Test (PPST), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) and QuickSIN tests were performed for all participants. The mean scores of the two groups were compared. \nResults: Patients with stroke had poorer performance in SMDT, PPST, RGDT and QuickSIN tests (p<0.001) compared to healthy subjects. The results showed that there was a significant correlation between SIN test with temporal and spectral processing in the normal group, but the correlation pattern was different in people with stroke. The scores of all the tests were not significantly different between the right and left ears. \nConclusion: The results showed that people with stroke have poorer performance in all tests compared to normal people and have more problems in speech perception in challenging areas. \nKeywords: Auditory processing disorder; speech perception in noise; spectral modulation; temporal processing; stroke","PeriodicalId":34089,"journal":{"name":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v33i3.15505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Perception of speech in noise (SIN) is based on the accurate extraction of spectral and temporal cues. Disruption of this process can reduce the productivity of the spectral and temporal features of the target stimulus and speech recognition in noise. Auditory processing disorder is one of the main challenges of people with stroke, which leads to social, mental, and even physical failures. This study aimed to investigate the spectral and temporal processing abilities of people with stroke compared to healthy peers. Methods: In this study, participants were 15 patients with stroke referred to the neurology clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital and 30 healthy people aged 20–60 years. Spectral Modulation Detection Test (SMDT), Pitch Pattern Sequencing Test (PPST), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) and QuickSIN tests were performed for all participants. The mean scores of the two groups were compared. Results: Patients with stroke had poorer performance in SMDT, PPST, RGDT and QuickSIN tests (p<0.001) compared to healthy subjects. The results showed that there was a significant correlation between SIN test with temporal and spectral processing in the normal group, but the correlation pattern was different in people with stroke. The scores of all the tests were not significantly different between the right and left ears. Conclusion: The results showed that people with stroke have poorer performance in all tests compared to normal people and have more problems in speech perception in challenging areas. Keywords: Auditory processing disorder; speech perception in noise; spectral modulation; temporal processing; stroke
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风成人与健康同龄人的频谱和时间处理能力比较
背景和目的:噪声中语音(SIN)的感知基于对频谱和时间线索的准确提取。这一过程的中断会降低目标刺激的频谱和时间特征以及噪声中语音识别的效率。听觉处理障碍是脑卒中患者面临的主要挑战之一,它会导致社交、精神甚至身体上的失败。本研究旨在调查脑卒中患者与健康人相比的频谱和时间处理能力。研究方法本研究的参与者包括 15 名转诊至伊玛目霍梅尼医院神经科诊所的中风患者和 30 名 20-60 岁的健康人。对所有参与者进行了频谱调制检测测试(SMDT)、音调模式排序测试(PPST)、随机间隙检测测试(RGDT)和 QuickSIN 测试。比较了两组人的平均得分。结果与健康人相比,脑卒中患者在 SMDT、PPST、RGDT 和 QuickSIN 测试中的表现较差(P<0.001)。结果显示,在正常组中,SIN 测试与时间和频谱处理有明显的相关性,但在脑卒中患者中,相关性模式不同。左右耳的所有测试得分均无明显差异。结论结果表明,与正常人相比,脑卒中患者在所有测试中的表现都较差,并且在具有挑战性的区域存在更多的言语感知问题。关键词听觉处理障碍;噪声中的语音感知;频谱调制;时间处理;中风
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Auditory and Vestibular Research
Auditory and Vestibular Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Spectral and Temporal Processing Abilities between Adults with Stroke and Healthy Peers Early Communication Skills Training for Infants and Toddlers with Cochlear ImplantEarly Communication Skills Training for Infants and Toddlers with Cochlear Implant Frequency of Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 and 2 and Cytomegalovirus in Perilymph and Peripheral Blood Samples of Cochlear-Implanted Children Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction Method Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Spatial Learning and Memory of Rats Acoustic Analysis of Fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ and Affricate /ʧ/ in Persian-Speaking Cochlear-Implanted Children and Normal-Hearing Peers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1