Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery Techniques in The Treatment of Acute Appendicitis: A literature review.

Alexander Gerardo Segovia Tapia, Gabriela Racines Coba, Jean Pierre Villafuerte Demera, L. D. S. Fierro, Doménica Villacís Vásquez, Cinthya Cecilia Ulloa Abad, Román Rolando Lima Cajas
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery Techniques in The Treatment of Acute Appendicitis: A literature review.","authors":"Alexander Gerardo Segovia Tapia, Gabriela Racines Coba, Jean Pierre Villafuerte Demera, L. D. S. Fierro, Doménica Villacís Vásquez, Cinthya Cecilia Ulloa Abad, Román Rolando Lima Cajas","doi":"10.55640/ijmsdh-10-05-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An appendectomy is often used to treat acute appendicitis, which is characterized by inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Techniques in minimally invasive surgery (MIS), such as endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT), single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), and laparoscopic appendectomy, have become popular substitutes for open surgery. The purpose of this review is to assess the safety and effectiveness of MIS methods for treating acute appendicitis. A comprehensive analysis of English-language literature from 2019 to 2024 was carried out to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MIS procedures for acute appendicitis. Research that satisfied the inclusion requirements was examined for pertinent information on SILS, ERAT, and laparoscopic appendectomy. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy showed shorter hospital stays, less pain after surgery, and quicker recovery rates. Comparable to traditional laparoscopic methods in terms of effectiveness, SILS and TULS provide potential advantages in terms of cosmesis and patient satisfaction. With faster recovery durations and fewer complications, ERAT showed encouraging results; nonetheless, questions about long-term effectiveness and recurrence rates were raised. In order to treat acute appendicitis, MIS procedures provide viable options that may shorten hospital stays, ease postoperative pain, and increase patient satisfaction. More investigation is necessary to improve patient selection criteria and operative approaches in order to maximize the efficacy of MIS in the therapy of appendicitis.","PeriodicalId":503011,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health","volume":"41 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmsdh-10-05-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An appendectomy is often used to treat acute appendicitis, which is characterized by inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Techniques in minimally invasive surgery (MIS), such as endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT), single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), and laparoscopic appendectomy, have become popular substitutes for open surgery. The purpose of this review is to assess the safety and effectiveness of MIS methods for treating acute appendicitis. A comprehensive analysis of English-language literature from 2019 to 2024 was carried out to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MIS procedures for acute appendicitis. Research that satisfied the inclusion requirements was examined for pertinent information on SILS, ERAT, and laparoscopic appendectomy. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy showed shorter hospital stays, less pain after surgery, and quicker recovery rates. Comparable to traditional laparoscopic methods in terms of effectiveness, SILS and TULS provide potential advantages in terms of cosmesis and patient satisfaction. With faster recovery durations and fewer complications, ERAT showed encouraging results; nonetheless, questions about long-term effectiveness and recurrence rates were raised. In order to treat acute appendicitis, MIS procedures provide viable options that may shorten hospital stays, ease postoperative pain, and increase patient satisfaction. More investigation is necessary to improve patient selection criteria and operative approaches in order to maximize the efficacy of MIS in the therapy of appendicitis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创手术技术治疗急性阑尾炎的有效性和安全性:文献综述。
阑尾切除术通常用于治疗以蚯蚓状阑尾发炎为特征的急性阑尾炎。微创手术(MIS)技术,如内镜逆行性阑尾炎治疗(ERAT)、单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)和腹腔镜阑尾切除术,已成为开腹手术的流行替代方法。本综述旨在评估 MIS 方法治疗急性阑尾炎的安全性和有效性。我们对2019年至2024年的英文文献进行了全面分析,以评估MIS手术治疗急性阑尾炎的安全性和有效性。对符合纳入要求的研究进行了检查,以了解有关SILS、ERAT和腹腔镜阑尾切除术的相关信息。与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术的住院时间更短、术后疼痛更轻、恢复更快。就效果而言,SILS 和 TULS 与传统腹腔镜方法不相上下,在外观和患者满意度方面具有潜在优势。ERAT 的恢复时间更快,并发症更少,结果令人鼓舞;然而,人们对其长期有效性和复发率提出了质疑。为了治疗急性阑尾炎,MIS 手术提供了可行的选择,可以缩短住院时间、减轻术后疼痛并提高患者满意度。为了最大限度地提高 MIS 在阑尾炎治疗中的疗效,有必要进行更多的研究,以改进患者选择标准和手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The relationship between Fatty Acids and Type II Diabetes Mellitus Evaluation of osseointegration and functionality in immediate implant-supported prostheses following sinus lift surgeries: A systematic narrative review. The Potential of Crocus sativus in the treatment of Burns—mini Review Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy Combined With Scaling And Root Planning In The Treatment Of Chronic Periodontitis: A Systematic Literature Review. CUES TO ACTION PREDICTORS OF THE COMPLETENESS POLIO VACCINATION IN SUB PIN POLIO IN BIREUEN DISTRICT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1