Methods and theory for analyzing intensive longitudinal data in family research

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Marriage and Family Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1111/jomf.12993
Jennifer S. Barber, Tim Futing Liao
{"title":"Methods and theory for analyzing intensive longitudinal data in family research","authors":"Jennifer S. Barber,&nbsp;Tim Futing Liao","doi":"10.1111/jomf.12993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although family scholars have long relied on longitudinal data, electronic methods of data collection like web- and app-based surveys have greatly increased the amount of data with many repeated measures at short intervals, sometimes called <i>intensive</i> longitudinal data. The authors provide a conceptual overview of this type of data, paying particular attention to the appropriate frequency for the intervals, and discuss some of the unique contributions to Life Course Theory that can be generated with such data. They illustrate two analytic techniques that especially benefit from an intensive longitudinal design—sequence analysis and between-within regression—by applying these methods to intensive longitudinal data from the Relationship Dynamics and Social Life Study that represent a “micro life course” of pregnancy risk (partnering, pregnancy desire, sex, and contraception) during the transition to adulthood. Their sequence analysis shows that singlehood, hormonal contraception, or partnered abstinence dominated most young women's micro-life courses. Black/African-American young women's micro life courses were similarly dominated by singlehood but were even more frequently dominated by partnered abstinence than their non-Black/African-American peers'. However, Black/African-American women's micro life courses were less stable, potentially explaining their higher undesired pregnancy rates. A between-within regression model shows that Black/African-American coital contraceptors were less likely than their non-Black/African-American peers to use withdrawal (rather than condoms). They conclude by suggesting some potential ways that intensive longitudinal data capturing micro-life courses can contribute to important outstanding research questions in family research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"86 5","pages":"1557-1585"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.12993","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although family scholars have long relied on longitudinal data, electronic methods of data collection like web- and app-based surveys have greatly increased the amount of data with many repeated measures at short intervals, sometimes called intensive longitudinal data. The authors provide a conceptual overview of this type of data, paying particular attention to the appropriate frequency for the intervals, and discuss some of the unique contributions to Life Course Theory that can be generated with such data. They illustrate two analytic techniques that especially benefit from an intensive longitudinal design—sequence analysis and between-within regression—by applying these methods to intensive longitudinal data from the Relationship Dynamics and Social Life Study that represent a “micro life course” of pregnancy risk (partnering, pregnancy desire, sex, and contraception) during the transition to adulthood. Their sequence analysis shows that singlehood, hormonal contraception, or partnered abstinence dominated most young women's micro-life courses. Black/African-American young women's micro life courses were similarly dominated by singlehood but were even more frequently dominated by partnered abstinence than their non-Black/African-American peers'. However, Black/African-American women's micro life courses were less stable, potentially explaining their higher undesired pregnancy rates. A between-within regression model shows that Black/African-American coital contraceptors were less likely than their non-Black/African-American peers to use withdrawal (rather than condoms). They conclude by suggesting some potential ways that intensive longitudinal data capturing micro-life courses can contribute to important outstanding research questions in family research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析家庭研究中密集纵向数据的方法和理论
尽管家庭学者长期以来一直依赖纵向数据,但基于网络和应用程序的调查等电子数据收集方法大大增加了在短时间间隔内进行多次重复测量的数据量,这种数据有时被称为密集纵向数据。作者对这类数据进行了概念性概述,特别关注了间隔的适当频率,并讨论了这类数据对生命历程理论的一些独特贡献。他们通过将这两种方法应用于 "关系动态与社会生活研究"(Relationship Dynamics and Social Life Study)中的密集纵向数据,展示了从密集纵向设计中特别受益的两种分析技术--序列分析和区间-内部回归,这些数据代表了向成年过渡期间怀孕风险的 "微观生命历程"(伴侣关系、怀孕意愿、性和避孕)。他们的序列分析表明,单身、激素避孕或伴侣禁欲在大多数年轻女性的微观生命历程中占主导地位。黑人/非裔美国人年轻女性的微观生活历程同样以单身为主,但与非黑人/非裔美国人同龄人相比,以伴侣禁欲为主的频率更高。不过,黑人/非裔美国妇女的微观生活轨迹不太稳定,这可能是她们意外怀孕率较高的原因。一个体内间回归模型显示,黑人/非裔美国人同房避孕者比非黑人/非裔美国人同龄人更不可能使用体外射精(而不是避孕套)。最后,他们提出了捕捉微观生活过程的密集纵向数据有助于解决家庭研究中重要的未决研究问题的一些潜在方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Introduction to mid-decade Special Issue on Theory and Methods The ties that bind: Questions for studying families in neighborhood contexts Issue Information Looking beyond marital status: What we can learn from relationship status measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1