Separablilty of metric measure spaces and choice axioms

IF 0.3 4区 数学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Archive for Mathematical Logic Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1007/s00153-024-00931-8
Paul Howard
{"title":"Separablilty of metric measure spaces and choice axioms","authors":"Paul Howard","doi":"10.1007/s00153-024-00931-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In set theory without the Axiom of Choice we prove that the assertion “For every metric space (<i>X</i>, <i>d</i>) with a Borel measure <span>\\(\\mu \\)</span> such that the measure of every open ball is positive and finite, (<i>X</i>, <i>d</i>) is separable.’ is implied by the axiom of choice for countable collections of sets and implies the axiom of choice for countable collections of finite sets. We also show that neither implication is reversible in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory weakend to permit the existence of atoms and that the second implication is not reversible in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. This gives an answer to a question of Dybowski and Górka (Arch Math Logic 62:735–749, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-023-00868-4).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48853,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-024-00931-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In set theory without the Axiom of Choice we prove that the assertion “For every metric space (Xd) with a Borel measure \(\mu \) such that the measure of every open ball is positive and finite, (Xd) is separable.’ is implied by the axiom of choice for countable collections of sets and implies the axiom of choice for countable collections of finite sets. We also show that neither implication is reversible in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory weakend to permit the existence of atoms and that the second implication is not reversible in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. This gives an answer to a question of Dybowski and Górka (Arch Math Logic 62:735–749, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-023-00868-4).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
度量空间的分离性和选择公理
在没有选择公理的集合论中,我们证明了 "对于每一个具有博勒度量(\mu \)的度量空间(X,d),使得每一个开球的度量都是正的、有限的,(X,d)是可分的 "这一断言是由可数集合的选择公理所隐含的,并且隐含着有限集合的可数集合的选择公理。我们还证明,在弱化了原子存在的泽尔默罗-弗伦克尔集合论中,这两个蕴涵都不是可逆的,而在泽尔默罗-弗伦克尔集合论中,第二个蕴涵也不是可逆的。这就回答了 Dybowski 和 Górka 的一个问题(Arch Math Logic 62:735-749, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-023-00868-4)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archive for Mathematical Logic
Archive for Mathematical Logic MATHEMATICS-LOGIC
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.
期刊最新文献
Punctually presented structures II: comparing presentations The Tarski–Lindenbaum algebra of the class of strongly constructivizable models with $$\omega $$-stable theories Glivenko–Cantelli classes and NIP formulas Separablilty of metric measure spaces and choice axioms Fragments of IOpen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1