Nikolay Bazhenov, Dariusz Kalociński, Michał Wrocławski
{"title":"Degrees of relations on canonically ordered natural numbers and integers","authors":"Nikolay Bazhenov, Dariusz Kalociński, Michał Wrocławski","doi":"10.1007/s00153-024-00942-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate the degree spectra of computable relations on canonically ordered natural numbers <span>\\((\\omega ,<)\\)</span> and integers <span>\\((\\zeta ,<)\\)</span>. As for <span>\\((\\omega ,<)\\)</span>, we provide several criteria that fix the degree spectrum of a computable relation to all c.e. or to all <span>\\(\\Delta _2\\)</span> degrees; this includes the complete characterization of the degree spectra of so-called computable block functions that have only finitely many types of blocks. Compared to Bazhenov et al. (in: LIPIcs, vol 219, pp 8:1–8:20, 2022), we obtain a more general solution to the problem regarding possible degree spectra on <span>\\((\\omega ,<)\\)</span>, answering the question whether there are infinitely many such spectra. As for <span>\\((\\zeta ,<)\\)</span>, we prove the following dichotomy result: given an arbitrary computable relation <i>R</i> on <span>\\((\\zeta ,<)\\)</span>, its degree spectrum is either trivial or it contains all c.e. degrees. This result, and the proof techniques required to solve it, extend the analogous theorem for <span>\\((\\omega ,<)\\)</span> obtained by Wright (Computability 7:349–365, 2018), and provide initial insight to Wright’s question whether such a dichotomy holds on computable ill-founded linear orders. This article is an extended version of Bazhenov et al. (in: LIPIcs, vol 219, pp 8:1–8:20, 2022).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48853,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":"64 1-2","pages":"299 - 331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00153-024-00942-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-024-00942-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigate the degree spectra of computable relations on canonically ordered natural numbers \((\omega ,<)\) and integers \((\zeta ,<)\). As for \((\omega ,<)\), we provide several criteria that fix the degree spectrum of a computable relation to all c.e. or to all \(\Delta _2\) degrees; this includes the complete characterization of the degree spectra of so-called computable block functions that have only finitely many types of blocks. Compared to Bazhenov et al. (in: LIPIcs, vol 219, pp 8:1–8:20, 2022), we obtain a more general solution to the problem regarding possible degree spectra on \((\omega ,<)\), answering the question whether there are infinitely many such spectra. As for \((\zeta ,<)\), we prove the following dichotomy result: given an arbitrary computable relation R on \((\zeta ,<)\), its degree spectrum is either trivial or it contains all c.e. degrees. This result, and the proof techniques required to solve it, extend the analogous theorem for \((\omega ,<)\) obtained by Wright (Computability 7:349–365, 2018), and provide initial insight to Wright’s question whether such a dichotomy holds on computable ill-founded linear orders. This article is an extended version of Bazhenov et al. (in: LIPIcs, vol 219, pp 8:1–8:20, 2022).
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.