Mobile Health Intervention Reduces Sedentary Time and Physical Inactivity in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases after Discharge: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart and Mind Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.4103/hm.hm-d-24-00005
Ryo Yoshihara, M. Kitamura, K. Ishihara, Y. Kanejima, Kazuhiro P Izawa
{"title":"Mobile Health Intervention Reduces Sedentary Time and Physical Inactivity in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases after Discharge: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Ryo Yoshihara, M. Kitamura, K. Ishihara, Y. Kanejima, Kazuhiro P Izawa","doi":"10.4103/hm.hm-d-24-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Long sedentary time and physical inactivity negatively impact patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Although more and more studies are exploring the effects of mobile health (mHealth), whether an intervention using mHealth reduces sedentary time and physical inactivity is controversial.\n \n \n \n This systematic review aimed to investigate whether mHealth can reduce sedentary time and physical inactivity in patients with CVD via a comprehensive search and evaluation of relevant articles and review of the effects of mHealth on sedentary time and physical inactivity.\n \n \n \n We searched articles on three databases PubMed, Web of Science, and CiNii using “mHealth,” “CVD,” and “clinical trials” as keywords. All studies using mHealth to reduce sedentary time and physical inactivity were included. We assessed risk of bias in the included studies and conducted a meta-analysis using a random effects model.\n \n \n \n After screening 502 articles, we included five randomized controlled trials. In one study, sedentary time was shorter in the intervention group than the control group by 61.5 min/day at 24 weeks. Three studies using physical inactivity as outcome measures were included in a meta-analysis, and the pooled odds ratio was 0.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.22–0.65), favoring the intervention group. All studies showed high risk of performance bias and low risk of selection bias and reporting bias.\n \n \n \n The mHealth intervention may remind patients with CVD of exercise training and help them reduce sedentary time and physical inactivity. Future studies need to show for how long mHealth can reduce sedentary time and clarify the cost-effectiveness of the mHealth intervention.\n","PeriodicalId":34653,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Mind","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/hm.hm-d-24-00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long sedentary time and physical inactivity negatively impact patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Although more and more studies are exploring the effects of mobile health (mHealth), whether an intervention using mHealth reduces sedentary time and physical inactivity is controversial. This systematic review aimed to investigate whether mHealth can reduce sedentary time and physical inactivity in patients with CVD via a comprehensive search and evaluation of relevant articles and review of the effects of mHealth on sedentary time and physical inactivity. We searched articles on three databases PubMed, Web of Science, and CiNii using “mHealth,” “CVD,” and “clinical trials” as keywords. All studies using mHealth to reduce sedentary time and physical inactivity were included. We assessed risk of bias in the included studies and conducted a meta-analysis using a random effects model. After screening 502 articles, we included five randomized controlled trials. In one study, sedentary time was shorter in the intervention group than the control group by 61.5 min/day at 24 weeks. Three studies using physical inactivity as outcome measures were included in a meta-analysis, and the pooled odds ratio was 0.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.22–0.65), favoring the intervention group. All studies showed high risk of performance bias and low risk of selection bias and reporting bias. The mHealth intervention may remind patients with CVD of exercise training and help them reduce sedentary time and physical inactivity. Future studies need to show for how long mHealth can reduce sedentary time and clarify the cost-effectiveness of the mHealth intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动健康干预可减少心血管疾病患者出院后的久坐时间和体力活动不足:系统回顾与元分析
久坐不动和缺乏运动对心血管疾病(CVD)患者有负面影响。尽管越来越多的研究正在探索移动医疗(mHealth)的效果,但使用移动医疗进行干预是否能减少久坐时间和缺乏运动仍存在争议。 本系统性综述旨在通过对相关文章的全面检索和评估,以及对移动医疗对久坐时间和缺乏运动的影响的综述,研究移动医疗是否能减少心血管疾病患者的久坐时间和缺乏运动的情况。 我们以 "移动医疗"、"心血管疾病 "和 "临床试验 "为关键词,在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 CiNii 三个数据库中检索了相关文章。所有利用移动医疗减少久坐时间和缺乏运动的研究均被纳入其中。我们评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险,并使用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析。 在筛选了 502 篇文章后,我们纳入了五项随机对照试验。在一项研究中,干预组在 24 周内的久坐时间比对照组每天缩短了 61.5 分钟。一项荟萃分析纳入了三项以身体活动不足为结果测量指标的研究,汇总的几率比为 0.38(95% 置信区间,0.22-0.65),干预组更胜一筹。所有研究均显示出较高的表现偏倚风险,较低的选择偏倚和报告偏倚风险。 移动医疗干预可以提醒心血管疾病患者进行运动训练,帮助他们减少久坐时间和缺乏运动的情况。未来的研究需要说明移动医疗能在多长时间内减少久坐时间,并明确移动医疗干预的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Depression and Adverse Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes: Cause or Consequence? New Insights and Clinical Practice on Heart, Brain, and Mind Enhancing Palliative Care for Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Scoping Review with Clinical Insights on the Integration of Physical Activity Adherent Right Atrial Cardiac Lipoma with Obstructive Symptoms: An Unusual Case Report Is Self-Reported Obstructive Sleep Apnea Associated with Cardiac Distress? A Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1