Audit firm tenure and corporate tax avoidance: evidence spanning COVID-19 pandemic

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Financial Crime Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1108/jfc-12-2023-0329
K. A. Kamarudin, Wan Adibah Wan Ismail, I. Harymawan, Akmalia Mohamad Ariff
{"title":"Audit firm tenure and corporate tax avoidance: evidence spanning COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"K. A. Kamarudin, Wan Adibah Wan Ismail, I. Harymawan, Akmalia Mohamad Ariff","doi":"10.1108/jfc-12-2023-0329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study aims to examine the effect of audit firm tenure (AFT) on corporate tax avoidance (CTA) and the moderating effect of the COVID-19 pandemic.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe sample comprises 41,074 firm-year observations from 32 countries from 2015 to 2020, for which data are collected from various sources: financial data from the Refinitiv database, country corporate tax rates from the Tax Foundation, and other country-level data from the World Bank database. The authors use the book tax difference to measure CTA and multiple proxies for AFT.\n\nFindings\nThis study finds that a longer AFT is associated with higher CTA, confirming the notion that long AFT impairs auditor independence. The findings remain robust when considering various AFT proxies, incorporating Hofstede’s cultural factors, using weighted least-squares estimation and addressing endogeneity through propensity score matching. This study also finds a non-linear relationship between extended client and auditor relationships and CTA, supporting the mandatory audit firm rotation regulation and increasing investors’ caution regarding the consequences of extended client–auditor relationships on firm behaviour.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study offers new evidence on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the link between AFT and CTA and documents a non-linear relationship between AFT, which has not been addressed in prior studies.\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings of this study have several significant practical implications. First, governments and policymakers gain insights into the consequences of extended auditor–client relationships, hence calling for a review of auditing and taxation regulations. Second, the findings provide important insights into the issue of auditor independence, especially during long engagements and crises such as COVID-19. Finally, investors and tax authorities should be more cautious about the risks of aggressive tax avoidance during crisis periods.\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to use a global data set to investigate the effect of AFT on CTA during the COVID-19 pandemic.\n","PeriodicalId":38940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Crime","volume":"18 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Crime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-12-2023-0329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the effect of audit firm tenure (AFT) on corporate tax avoidance (CTA) and the moderating effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design/methodology/approach The sample comprises 41,074 firm-year observations from 32 countries from 2015 to 2020, for which data are collected from various sources: financial data from the Refinitiv database, country corporate tax rates from the Tax Foundation, and other country-level data from the World Bank database. The authors use the book tax difference to measure CTA and multiple proxies for AFT. Findings This study finds that a longer AFT is associated with higher CTA, confirming the notion that long AFT impairs auditor independence. The findings remain robust when considering various AFT proxies, incorporating Hofstede’s cultural factors, using weighted least-squares estimation and addressing endogeneity through propensity score matching. This study also finds a non-linear relationship between extended client and auditor relationships and CTA, supporting the mandatory audit firm rotation regulation and increasing investors’ caution regarding the consequences of extended client–auditor relationships on firm behaviour. Research limitations/implications This study offers new evidence on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the link between AFT and CTA and documents a non-linear relationship between AFT, which has not been addressed in prior studies. Practical implications The findings of this study have several significant practical implications. First, governments and policymakers gain insights into the consequences of extended auditor–client relationships, hence calling for a review of auditing and taxation regulations. Second, the findings provide important insights into the issue of auditor independence, especially during long engagements and crises such as COVID-19. Finally, investors and tax authorities should be more cautious about the risks of aggressive tax avoidance during crisis periods. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to use a global data set to investigate the effect of AFT on CTA during the COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计事务所任期与公司避税:跨越 COVID-19 大流行的证据
本研究旨在考察审计事务所任期(AFT)对企业避税(CTA)的影响以及 COVID-19 大流行病的调节作用。样本包括 2015 年至 2020 年期间 32 个国家的 41074 个企业年观测值,数据收集来源多样:Refinitiv 数据库的财务数据、税收基金会的国家企业税率以及世界银行数据库的其他国家级数据。作者使用账面税收差异来衡量 CTA,并使用多种 AFT 代用指标来衡量 CTA。在考虑各种 AFT 代用指标、纳入霍夫斯泰德的文化因素、使用加权最小二乘法估计以及通过倾向得分匹配解决内生性问题时,研究结果依然稳健。本研究还发现,扩展的客户与审计师关系与 CTA 之间存在非线性关系,这支持了强制审计公司轮换规定,并提高了投资者对扩展的客户与审计师关系对公司行为的影响的警惕性。研究局限/意义本研究提供了 COVID-19 大流行对 AFT 与 CTA 之间联系的影响的新证据,并记录了 AFT 之间的非线性关系,而这在之前的研究中尚未涉及。首先,政府和政策制定者可以深入了解审计师与客户关系延伸的后果,从而呼吁对审计和税收法规进行审查。其次,研究结果为审计师的独立性问题提供了重要启示,尤其是在长期业务约定和 COVID-19 等危机期间。最后,投资者和税务机关应更加谨慎地对待危机期间激进避税的风险。 原创性/价值 据作者所知,这是第一项使用全球数据集调查 COVID-19 大流行期间 AFT 对 CTA 影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Crime
Journal of Financial Crime Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Crime, the leading journal in this field, publishes authoritative, practical and detailed insight in the most serious and topical issues relating to the control and prevention of financial crime and related abuse. The journal''s articles are authored by some of the leading international scholars and practitioners in the fields of law, criminology, economics, criminal justice and compliance. Consequently, articles are perceptive, evidence based and have policy impact. The journal covers a wide range of current topics including, but not limited to: • Tracing through the civil law of the proceeds of fraud • Cyber-crime: prevention and detection • Intelligence led investigations • Whistleblowing and the payment of rewards for information • Identity fraud • Insider dealing prosecutions • Specialised anti-corruption investigations • Underground banking systems • Asset tracing and forfeiture • Securities regulation and enforcement • Tax regimes and tax avoidance • Deferred prosecution agreements • Personal liability of compliance managers and professional advisers
期刊最新文献
Corporate criminal liability and the identification principle: a critical and comparative analysis across Mauritius, US, UK and Canada Corporate criminal liability and the identification principle: a critical and comparative analysis across Mauritius, US, UK and Canada Admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in money laundering cases in Pakistan Can supervisor reminders help prevent fraud in the mutual funds sector Analysing the characteristics of post-disaster funding that make it susceptible to the risk of economic crime: a South African frame of reference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1