Optimizing exercise prescription during breast cancer rehabilitation in women: Analysis of the load–velocity relationship in the box squat exercise

David M. Díez-Fernández, Alba Esteban-Simón, Andrés Baena-Raya, David Rodríguez-Rosell, Filipe Conceição, Manuel A. Rodríguez-Pérez, Alberto Soriano-Maldonado
{"title":"Optimizing exercise prescription during breast cancer rehabilitation in women: Analysis of the load–velocity relationship in the box squat exercise","authors":"David M. Díez-Fernández,&nbsp;Alba Esteban-Simón,&nbsp;Andrés Baena-Raya,&nbsp;David Rodríguez-Rosell,&nbsp;Filipe Conceição,&nbsp;Manuel A. Rodríguez-Pérez,&nbsp;Alberto Soriano-Maldonado","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aims of this study were to assess (i) the load–velocity relationship during the box squat exercise in women survivors of breast cancer, (ii) which velocity variable (mean velocity [MV], mean propulsive velocity [MPV], or peak velocity [PV]) shows stronger relationship with the relative load (%1RM), and (iii) which regression model (linear [LA] or polynomic [PA]) provides a greater fit for predicting the velocities associated with each %1RM. Nineteen women survivors of breast cancer (age: 53.2 ± 6.9 years, weight: 70.9 ± 13.1 kg, and height: 163.5 ± 7.4 cm) completed an incremental load test up to one-repetition maximum in the box squat exercise. The MV, MPV, and the PV were measured during the concentric phase of each repetition with a linear velocity transducer. These measurements were analyzed by regression models using LA and PA. Strong correlations of MV with %1RM (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.903/0.904; the standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 0.05 m<sup>.</sup>s<sup>−1</sup> by LA/PA) and MPV (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.900; SEE = 0.06 m<sup>.</sup>s<sup>−1</sup> by LA and PA) were observed. In contrast, PV showed a weaker association with %1RM (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.704; SEE = 0.15 m<sup>.</sup>s<sup>−1</sup> by LA and PA). The MV and MPV of 1RM was 0.22 ± 0.04 m·s<sup>−1</sup>, whereas the PV at 1RM was 0.63 ± 0.18 m<sup>.</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>. These findings suggest that the use of MV to prescribe relative loads during resistance training, as well as LA and PA regression models, accurately predicted velocities for each %1RM. Assessing and prescribing resistance exercises during breast cancer rehabilitation can be facilitated through the monitoring of movement velocity.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"24 7","pages":"1021-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12130","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aims of this study were to assess (i) the load–velocity relationship during the box squat exercise in women survivors of breast cancer, (ii) which velocity variable (mean velocity [MV], mean propulsive velocity [MPV], or peak velocity [PV]) shows stronger relationship with the relative load (%1RM), and (iii) which regression model (linear [LA] or polynomic [PA]) provides a greater fit for predicting the velocities associated with each %1RM. Nineteen women survivors of breast cancer (age: 53.2 ± 6.9 years, weight: 70.9 ± 13.1 kg, and height: 163.5 ± 7.4 cm) completed an incremental load test up to one-repetition maximum in the box squat exercise. The MV, MPV, and the PV were measured during the concentric phase of each repetition with a linear velocity transducer. These measurements were analyzed by regression models using LA and PA. Strong correlations of MV with %1RM (R2 = 0.903/0.904; the standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 0.05 m.s−1 by LA/PA) and MPV (R2 = 0.900; SEE = 0.06 m.s−1 by LA and PA) were observed. In contrast, PV showed a weaker association with %1RM (R2 = 0.704; SEE = 0.15 m.s−1 by LA and PA). The MV and MPV of 1RM was 0.22 ± 0.04 m·s−1, whereas the PV at 1RM was 0.63 ± 0.18 m.s−1. These findings suggest that the use of MV to prescribe relative loads during resistance training, as well as LA and PA regression models, accurately predicted velocities for each %1RM. Assessing and prescribing resistance exercises during breast cancer rehabilitation can be facilitated through the monitoring of movement velocity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化女性乳腺癌康复期间的运动处方:箱式深蹲运动中的负荷-速度关系分析
本研究的目的是评估(i)乳腺癌女性幸存者在箱蹲运动中的负荷-速度关系,(ii)哪个速度变量(平均速度[MV]、平均推进速度[MPV]或峰值速度[PV])与相对负荷(%1RM)的关系更密切,以及(iii)哪个回归模型(线性[LA]或多项式[PA])更适合预测与每个%1RM相关的速度。19 名乳腺癌女性幸存者(年龄:53.2±6.9 岁,体重:70.9±13.1 千克,身高:163.5±7.4 厘米)完成了箱式深蹲运动中的增量负荷测试,直至一次重复最大值。在每次重复的同心阶段,使用线性速度传感器测量 MV、MPV 和 PV。这些测量值通过使用 LA 和 PA 的回归模型进行分析。观察发现,MV 与 1RM 百分比(R2 = 0.903/0.904;LA/PA 的估计标准误差(SEE)= 0.05 m.s-1)和 MPV(R2 = 0.900;LA 和 PA 的估计标准误差(SEE)= 0.06 m.s-1)密切相关。相比之下,PV 与 1%1RM 的关系较弱(R2 = 0.704;LA 和 PA 的 SEE = 0.15 m.s-1)。1RM 的 MV 和 MPV 为 0.22 ± 0.04 m-s-1,而 1RM 时的 PV 为 0.63 ± 0.18 m.s-1。这些研究结果表明,在阻力训练中使用MV来规定相对负荷,以及LA和PA回归模型,可以准确预测每个%1RM的速度。在乳腺癌康复过程中,通过监测运动速度可以帮助评估和制定阻力训练计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Performance Analysis of 200 m Qualifying Time Trial: Gear Ratios, Velocity Patterns, and Acceleration Strategies. The Association Between Early Sport Specialization and Injury and Career Outcomes Among National Football League Athletes Acute Hypoxia Decreases Maximum Fat Oxidation Rate During Step Incremental Exercise Normalized to Respiratory Compensation Point Issue Information Associations of Domain-Specific Physical Activity With Mental Health Symptoms Among Finnish Employed Adults: A Population-Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1