Ecological risk evaluation of spent engine oil pollution using earthworm and microbial bioassays

A. J. Nnawuike, A. Udebuani, Nwachukwu Udodi Chibuike, Igwe Charles Ekene, Dike Kelechi Stanley, Nzenwa Peter Odinaka, Igbokwe Moses Chukwuebuka
{"title":"Ecological risk evaluation of spent engine oil pollution using earthworm and microbial bioassays","authors":"A. J. Nnawuike, A. Udebuani, Nwachukwu Udodi Chibuike, Igwe Charles Ekene, Dike Kelechi Stanley, Nzenwa Peter Odinaka, Igbokwe Moses Chukwuebuka","doi":"10.22515/sustinere.jes.v8i1.382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to assess the ecotoxicological risk associated with the indiscriminate disposal of spent engine oil on terrestrial ecosystem using earthworm and microbial assays. Soil samples were collected from a depth of 0-20 cm and subjected to standard analytical protocols for analysis. Earthworms (assessed by mortality rate) and microorganisms (evaluated for inhibitory effects) covered a wide range of short-term lethal and sub-lethal endpoints used for risk characterization, analyzed through Probit analysis. The result of acute toxicity assay revealed that microbial absorbance rated depended on the dose and type of organism, ranking in the order: Acinetobacter > Enterobacter > Bacillus species >Pseudomonas. Aas oil concentratoin increase, mortality among earthworm was observed.  Risk Quotient (RQ) values for Zea mays, Vigna unguiculata, Glycine max and earthworm varied from low to very high risk based on estimated Predicted No Effect Concentration (PNEC) values. Microorganisms exhibited differing level of biotolerance to spent engine oil exposure as indicated by respective risk quotient values. Exposure to spent engine oil posed minimal risk to Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp., and Acinetobacter sp.,  with RQ values below unity (< 1). Conversely, Enterobacter sp. Showed a high risk with values above unity. Earthworms play a pivotal role in agriculture due to their numerous economic benefots. Soil microorganisms are essential for maintening soil quality by performing vital processes. The antimicrobial properties of spent engine oil on soil may distort microbial activities, potentially inhibiting their growth and leading to alterations in ecological functionality of the soil. ","PeriodicalId":22187,"journal":{"name":"Sustinere: Journal of Environment and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustinere: Journal of Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22515/sustinere.jes.v8i1.382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the ecotoxicological risk associated with the indiscriminate disposal of spent engine oil on terrestrial ecosystem using earthworm and microbial assays. Soil samples were collected from a depth of 0-20 cm and subjected to standard analytical protocols for analysis. Earthworms (assessed by mortality rate) and microorganisms (evaluated for inhibitory effects) covered a wide range of short-term lethal and sub-lethal endpoints used for risk characterization, analyzed through Probit analysis. The result of acute toxicity assay revealed that microbial absorbance rated depended on the dose and type of organism, ranking in the order: Acinetobacter > Enterobacter > Bacillus species >Pseudomonas. Aas oil concentratoin increase, mortality among earthworm was observed.  Risk Quotient (RQ) values for Zea mays, Vigna unguiculata, Glycine max and earthworm varied from low to very high risk based on estimated Predicted No Effect Concentration (PNEC) values. Microorganisms exhibited differing level of biotolerance to spent engine oil exposure as indicated by respective risk quotient values. Exposure to spent engine oil posed minimal risk to Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp., and Acinetobacter sp.,  with RQ values below unity (< 1). Conversely, Enterobacter sp. Showed a high risk with values above unity. Earthworms play a pivotal role in agriculture due to their numerous economic benefots. Soil microorganisms are essential for maintening soil quality by performing vital processes. The antimicrobial properties of spent engine oil on soil may distort microbial activities, potentially inhibiting their growth and leading to alterations in ecological functionality of the soil. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用蚯蚓和微生物生物测定法对废机油污染进行生态风险评估
这项研究旨在利用蚯蚓和微生物检测法评估任意弃置废机油对陆地生态系统造成的生态毒理学风险。研究人员从 0-20 厘米深处采集土壤样本,并按照标准分析规程进行分析。蚯蚓(通过死亡率评估)和微生物(通过抑制作用评估)涵盖了用于风险特征描述的各种短期致死和亚致死终点,并通过 Probit 分析进行了分析。急性毒性检测结果表明,微生物吸光度的高低取决于剂量和生物类型,依次为:乙酰胆碱杆菌 > 肠杆菌:不动杆菌 > 肠杆菌 > 芽孢杆菌 > 假单胞菌。随着油浓缩物的增加,蚯蚓的死亡率也有所上升。 根据预测无效应浓度(PNEC)的估计值,玉米、糯稻、大豆和蚯蚓的风险商数(RQ)值从低到高不等。微生物对接触废机油表现出不同程度的生物耐受性,这体现在各自的风险商数值上。接触废机油对假单胞菌属、芽孢杆菌属和醋氨梭菌属造成的风险极小,风险商数值低于统一值(< 1)。相反,肠杆菌的风险很高,其值高于统一值。蚯蚓在农业中发挥着举足轻重的作用,因为它们能带来许多经济效益。土壤微生物执行着重要的过程,对保持土壤质量至关重要。废机油在土壤中的抗微生物特性可能会扭曲微生物的活动,潜在地抑制其生长并导致土壤生态功能的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Distribution, local use, and bio-prospecting opportunity of Ocimum americanum L. in Northwestern part of the Amhara Region, Ethiopia Sustainability consciousness in higher education: Construction of three-dimensional sustainability and role of locus of control Utilization of durian peels (Durio zibethinus) and lubricant treatment sludge as raw materials of Refuse-Derived Fuel Determinants of spatial distribution of trees outside forests along urban-rural gradients: A review Ecological risk evaluation of spent engine oil pollution using earthworm and microbial bioassays
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1