Stylistic Analysis of Francis Bacon’s Selected Essays

Khaled Ahmad Sarwary, Zalmai Samsor
{"title":"Stylistic Analysis of Francis Bacon’s Selected Essays","authors":"Khaled Ahmad Sarwary, Zalmai Samsor","doi":"10.36892/ijlls.v6i2.1574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is an attempt to analyze stylistically Bacon’s essays.  The main purpose of this study is to analyze the writing style of Francis Bacon in the following selected essays (Of Studies, Of Revenge, OF Ambition, and Of Marriage and Single Live).  Researchers analyzed the writing style of Bacon in these essays, specifically the aphoristic style. One of the most crucial characteristics of Bacon’s essays style is aphorism. It is a style which specified by the direct, straightforward, pithy and concise language. Apart from this, utilitarianism which is another feature of Bacon’s essay style, has been clarified clearly. Utilitarianism is a philosophy of thought that maintains and supports that the foremost actions are those that create the most happiness for the greatest number of people. In fact, researchers have found some elements regarding the selected essays such as didacticism, mannerism as well as worldly wisdom that introduce Francis Bacon as a utilitarian writer. Moreover, other crucial elements of Bacon’s essays such as quotations, impersonality, as well as paragraphs have been analyzed very briefly in this paper. Actually, this study is based on qualitative research. The research design was the textual analysis in order to analyze the text. The main instrument was the text of Francis Bacon’s selected essays. The data were in the form of lines, sentences, phrases and words. To analyze the text, the researchers have used steps such as paraphrasing, analyzing, identification and classification. Finally, the result of this study shows the writing style of Francis Bacon which is based on aphoristic, utilitarianism and other significant elements, like the usage of impressive quotations, unique paragraphs and Bacon’s objectivity regarding his essays.","PeriodicalId":506434,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies","volume":"111 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i2.1574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to analyze stylistically Bacon’s essays.  The main purpose of this study is to analyze the writing style of Francis Bacon in the following selected essays (Of Studies, Of Revenge, OF Ambition, and Of Marriage and Single Live).  Researchers analyzed the writing style of Bacon in these essays, specifically the aphoristic style. One of the most crucial characteristics of Bacon’s essays style is aphorism. It is a style which specified by the direct, straightforward, pithy and concise language. Apart from this, utilitarianism which is another feature of Bacon’s essay style, has been clarified clearly. Utilitarianism is a philosophy of thought that maintains and supports that the foremost actions are those that create the most happiness for the greatest number of people. In fact, researchers have found some elements regarding the selected essays such as didacticism, mannerism as well as worldly wisdom that introduce Francis Bacon as a utilitarian writer. Moreover, other crucial elements of Bacon’s essays such as quotations, impersonality, as well as paragraphs have been analyzed very briefly in this paper. Actually, this study is based on qualitative research. The research design was the textual analysis in order to analyze the text. The main instrument was the text of Francis Bacon’s selected essays. The data were in the form of lines, sentences, phrases and words. To analyze the text, the researchers have used steps such as paraphrasing, analyzing, identification and classification. Finally, the result of this study shows the writing style of Francis Bacon which is based on aphoristic, utilitarianism and other significant elements, like the usage of impressive quotations, unique paragraphs and Bacon’s objectivity regarding his essays.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弗朗西斯-培根散文选》的文体分析
本文试图对培根的散文进行文体分析。 本研究的主要目的是分析弗朗西斯-培根在以下所选文章(《论研究》、《论复仇》、《论野心》和《论婚姻与单身生活》)中的写作风格。 研究人员分析了培根在这些文章中的写作风格,特别是警句式风格。箴言体是培根文章风格中最重要的特点之一。这种文体的特点是语言直接、直白、精炼、简洁。除此之外,功利主义也是培根散文风格的另一个特点,这一点已被明确阐明。功利主义是一种思想哲学,它主张并支持最重要的行为是那些能为最多人创造最大幸福的行为。事实上,研究人员在所选文章中发现了一些元素,如说教、举止和世俗智慧,这些元素将弗朗西斯-培根介绍为一位功利主义作家。此外,本文还简要分析了培根文章中的其他关键要素,如引文、非个人化以及段落。实际上,本研究基于定性研究。研究设计采用文本分析法来分析文本。主要工具是弗朗西斯-培根的精选文章。数据以行、句、短语和词的形式存在。为了对文本进行分析,研究人员采用了解析、分析、识别和分类等步骤。最后,研究结果显示了弗朗西斯-培根的写作风格,这种风格以警句、功利主义和其他重要元素为基础,如令人印象深刻的引文的使用、独特的段落以及培根对其文章的客观性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining the Quality of Arabic Subtitles: A Multi-dimensional Assessment Approach Benefits, Challenges, and Attitudes Toward ChatGPT in English Writing Courses at Saudi Universities An Action Research on the Impact of Podcasts in Grammar Learning of Elementary Students Learner Autonomy, Language Learning Strategies and English Language Proficiency of Filipino Senior High School Students The Ambiguity Commune of The Novel “The Magic Mountain”: Social Class Tensions and Inquiry of Self
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1