A Comparative Analysis of the Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Diabetes

Mohammad Maydanchi, Mehrbod Ziaei, Mehrdad Mohammadi, Armin Ziaei, Mina Basiry, Fatemeh Haji, Kazhal Gharibi
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Diabetes","authors":"Mohammad Maydanchi, Mehrbod Ziaei, Mehrdad Mohammadi, Armin Ziaei, Mina Basiry, Fatemeh Haji, Kazhal Gharibi","doi":"10.31181/jopi21202421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diabetes can lead to various health problems and complications, such as cardiovascular disease, kidney damage (nephropathy), eye issues, neuropathy, and foot ailments. Therefore, early diagnosis of diabetes can be immensely beneficial in preventing the development of these conditions. Utilizing machine learning is one method to detect diabetes in individuals at an early stage. In this study, we compare the performance of nine machine-learning classification models in predicting diabetes. These models include XGBoost, gradient boosting, AdaBoost, logistic regression, decision tree, KNN, perceptron, random forest, and naïve bayes. We utilize several evaluation metrics, focusing on the f1-score, area under the curve (AUC), and computational runtime. Our comparison reveals that complex tree-based models exhibit the highest f1-score and AUC, albeit with longer execution times.","PeriodicalId":515345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Intelligence","volume":"105 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operations Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31181/jopi21202421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetes can lead to various health problems and complications, such as cardiovascular disease, kidney damage (nephropathy), eye issues, neuropathy, and foot ailments. Therefore, early diagnosis of diabetes can be immensely beneficial in preventing the development of these conditions. Utilizing machine learning is one method to detect diabetes in individuals at an early stage. In this study, we compare the performance of nine machine-learning classification models in predicting diabetes. These models include XGBoost, gradient boosting, AdaBoost, logistic regression, decision tree, KNN, perceptron, random forest, and naïve bayes. We utilize several evaluation metrics, focusing on the f1-score, area under the curve (AUC), and computational runtime. Our comparison reveals that complex tree-based models exhibit the highest f1-score and AUC, albeit with longer execution times.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测糖尿病的机器学习方法比较分析
糖尿病可导致各种健康问题和并发症,如心血管疾病、肾损伤(肾病)、眼部问题、神经病变和足部疾病。因此,早期诊断糖尿病对预防这些病症的发生大有裨益。利用机器学习是早期检测糖尿病的一种方法。在本研究中,我们比较了九种机器学习分类模型在预测糖尿病方面的性能。这些模型包括 XGBoost、梯度提升、AdaBoost、逻辑回归、决策树、KNN、感知器、随机森林和天真贝叶斯。我们采用了多个评估指标,重点关注 f1 分数、曲线下面积(AUC)和计算运行时间。比较结果表明,基于复杂树的模型表现出最高的 f1 分数和 AUC,尽管执行时间较长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Academic Performance of Turkish Universities in 2023: A MEREC-WEDBA Hybrid Methodology Approach A Comparative Analysis of the Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Diabetes A Distance Measure of Fermatean Fuzzy Sets Based on Triangular Divergence and its Application in Medical Diagnosis A Framework for Assessment of Logistics Enterprises’ Safety Standardization Performance Based on Prospect Theory A Framework for Assessment of Logistics Enterprises’ Safety Standardization Performance Based on Prospect Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1