Evaluation of Tactile and Thermophysiological Comfort in Reusable Surgical Gowns Compared to Disposable Gowns

Textiles Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.3390/textiles4020014
Magdalena Georgievska, A. B. Nigusse, B. Malengier, H. Tahir, Charlotte Harding, Sufiyan Derbew Tiku, L. Van Langenhove
{"title":"Evaluation of Tactile and Thermophysiological Comfort in Reusable Surgical Gowns Compared to Disposable Gowns","authors":"Magdalena Georgievska, A. B. Nigusse, B. Malengier, H. Tahir, Charlotte Harding, Sufiyan Derbew Tiku, L. Van Langenhove","doi":"10.3390/textiles4020014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though the transition from disposable to reusable surgical gowns holds substantial promise, successful implementation faces challenges. This study investigated tactile and thermophysiological comfort in surgical reusable gowns, comparing them with their disposable counterparts. Parameters such as surface roughness, compression, heat flux, and material rigidity were tested using a Fabric Touch Tester. Additionally, the water vapour permeability and static charge of the gowns were assessed. Thermophysiological comfort of the gowns was evaluated by measuring the temperature and relative humidity (RH) on test subjects during wear trials where they were engaged in an activity that mimics a surgeon’s performance. Skin temperature was monitored using iButton sensors and a thermal camera, and the impact on heart rate during the task was analysed. Following each test, participants provided subjective feedback through a questionnaire. The results indicated that reusable gowns boasted a smoother texture, translating to reduced friction on the skin and better heat transfer compared to the disposable fabrics, as indicated using FTT. They also exhibited higher water vapour permeability compared to their disposable counterparts. The wear trials revealed minimal differences in comfort between disposable and reusable gowns. While performing the activity, an increase in body temperature led to decreased RH, yet this rise did not adversely affect subject comfort, as validated using heart rate and questionnaire survey data. From a comfort point of view, switching from disposable to reusable gowns would not have drawbacks, meaning hospitals should be able to switch provided logistics and costs can be managed.","PeriodicalId":508683,"journal":{"name":"Textiles","volume":"115 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Textiles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles4020014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though the transition from disposable to reusable surgical gowns holds substantial promise, successful implementation faces challenges. This study investigated tactile and thermophysiological comfort in surgical reusable gowns, comparing them with their disposable counterparts. Parameters such as surface roughness, compression, heat flux, and material rigidity were tested using a Fabric Touch Tester. Additionally, the water vapour permeability and static charge of the gowns were assessed. Thermophysiological comfort of the gowns was evaluated by measuring the temperature and relative humidity (RH) on test subjects during wear trials where they were engaged in an activity that mimics a surgeon’s performance. Skin temperature was monitored using iButton sensors and a thermal camera, and the impact on heart rate during the task was analysed. Following each test, participants provided subjective feedback through a questionnaire. The results indicated that reusable gowns boasted a smoother texture, translating to reduced friction on the skin and better heat transfer compared to the disposable fabrics, as indicated using FTT. They also exhibited higher water vapour permeability compared to their disposable counterparts. The wear trials revealed minimal differences in comfort between disposable and reusable gowns. While performing the activity, an increase in body temperature led to decreased RH, yet this rise did not adversely affect subject comfort, as validated using heart rate and questionnaire survey data. From a comfort point of view, switching from disposable to reusable gowns would not have drawbacks, meaning hospitals should be able to switch provided logistics and costs can be managed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可重复使用手术衣与一次性手术衣的触觉和热生理学舒适性对比评估
尽管从一次性手术衣过渡到可重复使用手术衣前景广阔,但成功实施仍面临挑战。本研究对可重复使用手术衣的触觉和热生理舒适性进行了调查,并将其与一次性手术衣进行了比较。使用织物触感测试仪对表面粗糙度、压缩、热通量和材料硬度等参数进行了测试。此外,还对手术服的水蒸气渗透性和静电荷进行了评估。通过测量受试者穿戴时的温度和相对湿度(RH),对手术服的热生理舒适性进行了评估。使用 iButton 传感器和热像仪监测皮肤温度,并分析任务期间对心率的影响。每次测试后,参与者都会通过问卷提供主观反馈。结果表明,与一次性织物相比,可重复使用的长袍质地更光滑,减少了对皮肤的摩擦,热传导效果更好。与一次性织物相比,它们还具有更高的水蒸气渗透性。穿戴试验显示,一次性和可重复使用长袍的舒适度差异很小。在进行活动时,体温升高会导致相对湿度下降,但这种上升并不会对受试者的舒适度产生不利影响,这一点已通过心率和问卷调查数据得到验证。从舒适度的角度来看,从一次性手术衣转换到可重复使用手术衣不会有任何弊端,这意味着只要物流和成本能够得到控制,医院就应该能够转换手术衣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Added-Value of Cotton Textile Waste for Nonwoven Applications Towards Single-Polymer-Based Fully Printed Textile-Based Flexible Ag2O-Zn Battery for Wearable Electronics Evaluation of Tactile and Thermophysiological Comfort in Reusable Surgical Gowns Compared to Disposable Gowns Quantification of Fundamental Textile Properties of Electronic Textiles Fabricated Using Different Techniques Artificial-Neural-Network-Based Predicted Model for Seam Strength of Five-Pocket Denim Jeans: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1