Reconstruction methods for large cranial-nasal communications: surgeons’ concerns about proper anterior skull base reconstruction

Kong Srey Nuch, Jong Won Hong
{"title":"Reconstruction methods for large cranial-nasal communications: surgeons’ concerns about proper anterior skull base reconstruction","authors":"Kong Srey Nuch, Jong Won Hong","doi":"10.12790/ahm.24.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Skull base reconstruction is one of the most difficult reconstructive surgical procedures. Due to its complexity, most surgeons have modified the reconstruction methods to minimize the postoperative complications and mortality rate. In the past, flap surgery was not usually performed, but it has recently become more common due to advances in medicine. In this study, we analyzed successful flap surgery methods in skull base reconstruction for large cranial-nasal communications.Methods: Patients who underwent skull base reconstruction from April 2015 to January 2024 were eligible for this study. Of these patients, we included those who underwent reconstruction using a volumetric flap. Reconstructions that only used the conventional galeal flap, allograft skin, or bone substitute were excluded. The reconstruction methods used local flaps and free flaps.Results: In total, 22 patients underwent skull base reconstruction. The most frequently used local flap was the bilateral reverse temporalis muscle flap (seven of 11 cases), and the most frequent free flap was the anterior lateral thigh flap (10 of 11 cases). Other local flap operations used the modified temporalis muscle flap and scalp flap. A rectus myocutaneous flap was also used. There were no cases of flap necrosis.Conclusion: Flap surgery is needed for skull base reconstruction in patients with large cranial-nasal communications. As long as the flap volume is large enough to block and fill the defect, either a local flap or a free flap can be used for reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":137349,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12790/ahm.24.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Skull base reconstruction is one of the most difficult reconstructive surgical procedures. Due to its complexity, most surgeons have modified the reconstruction methods to minimize the postoperative complications and mortality rate. In the past, flap surgery was not usually performed, but it has recently become more common due to advances in medicine. In this study, we analyzed successful flap surgery methods in skull base reconstruction for large cranial-nasal communications.Methods: Patients who underwent skull base reconstruction from April 2015 to January 2024 were eligible for this study. Of these patients, we included those who underwent reconstruction using a volumetric flap. Reconstructions that only used the conventional galeal flap, allograft skin, or bone substitute were excluded. The reconstruction methods used local flaps and free flaps.Results: In total, 22 patients underwent skull base reconstruction. The most frequently used local flap was the bilateral reverse temporalis muscle flap (seven of 11 cases), and the most frequent free flap was the anterior lateral thigh flap (10 of 11 cases). Other local flap operations used the modified temporalis muscle flap and scalp flap. A rectus myocutaneous flap was also used. There were no cases of flap necrosis.Conclusion: Flap surgery is needed for skull base reconstruction in patients with large cranial-nasal communications. As long as the flap volume is large enough to block and fill the defect, either a local flap or a free flap can be used for reconstruction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大面积颅鼻沟通的重建方法:外科医生对正确重建前颅底的担忧
目的:颅底重建是最困难的重建外科手术之一。由于其复杂性,大多数外科医生都对重建方法进行了修改,以尽量减少术后并发症和死亡率。在过去,皮瓣手术并不常见,但随着医学的进步,皮瓣手术近来变得越来越普遍。在这项研究中,我们分析了成功的皮瓣手术方法在大面积颅鼻沟通的颅底重建中的应用:2015年4月至2024年1月期间接受颅底重建术的患者均符合本研究的条件。在这些患者中,我们纳入了使用体积皮瓣进行重建的患者。仅使用传统颅骨瓣、同种异体皮肤或骨替代物进行重建的患者被排除在外。重建方法包括局部皮瓣和游离皮瓣:结果:共有 22 名患者接受了颅底重建手术。最常用的局部皮瓣是双侧反向颞肌皮瓣(11 例中有 7 例),最常用的游离皮瓣是大腿前外侧皮瓣(11 例中有 10 例)。其他局部皮瓣手术使用的是改良颞肌皮瓣和头皮皮瓣。此外还使用了直肌皮瓣。没有出现皮瓣坏死的病例:结论:大面积颅鼻沟通患者的颅底重建需要皮瓣手术。结论:大面积颅鼻沟通患者的颅底重建需要皮瓣手术,只要皮瓣的体积足以阻挡和填充缺损,就可以使用局部皮瓣或游离皮瓣进行重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improved flap perfusion and hemostasis after postoperative embolization in free flap surgery: a case report Arthrodesis for Eaton-Littler stage III degenerative trapeziometacarpal arthritis: a retrospective comparative study of fixation methods Nail growth disorder in multiple fingers following harvesting of radial forearm free flap for phalloplasty in gender-affirming surgery: a case report Reconstruction methods for large cranial-nasal communications: surgeons’ concerns about proper anterior skull base reconstruction The role of surgical timing in upper extremity free flap reconstruction following trauma: a 10-year single-center, single-surgeon experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1